· Public charity
Mmap Inc
To educate, counsel, and empower michigan's older adults and individuals with disabilities, and those who serve them, so that they can make informed health benefit decisions.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 16 grants below total $630,407 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,199,816 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $569,409 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $10k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $329k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $291k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AREA AGENCY ON AGING 1-B | $129,381 |
| AREA AGENCY ON AGING | $87,163 |
| THE SENIOR ALLIANCE | $74,837 |
| AREA AGENCY ON AGING OF WESTERN MI | $48,930 |
| REGION VII AREA AGENCY ON AGING | $39,884 |
| UP AREA AGENCY ON AGING UPCAP SER | $37,570 |
| REGION IV AREA AGENCY ON AGING | $35,388 |
| REGION 2 AREA AGENCY ON AGING | $27,967 |
| TRI-COUNTY OFFICE ON AGING | $26,358 |
| VALLEY AREA AGENCY ON AGING | $25,616 |
| REGION 3B AREA AGENCY ON AGING | $23,549 |
| REGION 9 AREA AGENCY ON AGING NORTH | $18,589 |
| AREA AGENCY ON AGING OF NORTHWEST | $18,162 |
| SENIOR RESOURCES | $14,533 |
| REGION 3-A AREA AGENCY ON AGING | $12,790 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $8.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 61% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
16 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ANAgeWays Nonprofit Senior Services8× · 2017–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +59%
- DADETROIT AREA AGENCY ON AGING8× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +51%
- TSTHE SENIOR ALLIANCE INC8× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +28%
Funded once
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Area 1 agency on aging provides leadership and services that support and promote healthy aging.
A federally designated Area Agency on Aging whose mission is to bring independence enhancing supportive services to the 60+ population and their caregivers in our 17 county-wide service area.
Assisting individuals to maintain independence and personal choice by providing resource options and services
The organization's mission is to work with people, communities, and organizations to educate, prepare, and assist them in meeting the needs of the aging.the organization's vision is to be the recognized community leader in providing…
The area agencies on aging association of michigan (4ami)'s mission is to provide a collective voice and take action to promote healthy aging, dignity, and independence for older adults, persons with disabilities, and caregivers. they…
To promote the highest quality of life, area agency on aging 3 will provide access to a network of services, education, and advocacy as the region's aging and disability resource expert.
The mission of midland area agency on aging is to provide caring and quality services to older adults and their families that enable independent living with dignity in their homes and communities.
The older American act intends that the area agency on aging shall be the leader relative to all aging issuers on behalf of all older persons in the planning and service area. This means that the area agency shall proactively carry out,…
We strive to make aging easier through the development of a network of services for older persons designed to optimize the quality of their lives.
Our mission at Marinette County Elderly Services is to assist older persons in maintaining a longer, healthier, and more fulfilled life.
It is the mission of Eastern Area Agency on Aging to be the best source of information, options, and services for seniors, adults with disabilities, and caregivers.
The area agency on aging, planning and service area 2 improves the quality of life for the older adults in its nine-county community by advocating for individuals, developing and supporting a strong network of services, and providing…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Region Vii Area Agency On Aging and the most unlike its peers is Valley Area Agency on Aging. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AgeWays Nonprofit Senior Services ↗
- Who funds DETROIT AREA AGENCY ON AGING ↗
- Who funds THE SENIOR ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds AREA AGENCY ON AGING OF WESTERN MICHIGAN INC ↗
- Who funds REGION VII AREA AGENCY ON AGING ↗
- Who funds UPCAP SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Valley Area Agency on Aging ↗
- Who funds REGION IV AREA AGENCY ON AGING INC (WITH FOSTER GRANDPARENTS PROGRAM) ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST MICHIGAN COMMUNITY SERVICE AGENCY INC ↗
- Who funds Senior Resources of West Michigan ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST SENIOR RESOURCES INC ↗
- Who funds REGION 3B AREA AGENCY ON AGING ↗
- Who funds REGION II COMMISSION ON SERVICES TO THE AGING ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Michigan Health Endowment Fund · Dte Energy Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Mmap Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Mmap Inc?
Find your warmest path to Mmap Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.