Skip to content
Mj Insurance Charitable Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Mj Insurance Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$304k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Education$355kHuman Services$97kEmployment$88kHealth$77kFood & Nutrition$31kHousing & Shelter$30kReligion$25kArts & Culture$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $180k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$434k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BUTLER FOUNDATION$75,000
HOPE WOMEN'S CENTER INC$25,000
DRESS FOR SUCCESS DENVER$25,000
INDY HYGIENE HUB$25,000
TEAM CHAD$25,000
DAYSPRING CENTER$20,000
WE DON'T WASTE$15,000
ARMADA HOPE RAINBOW ANGELS$15,000
INDY READS$15,000
UPRISE$15,000
THE CENTERS FOR HABILITATION$5,000
PATHWAYS KITCHEN CORPORATION$5,000
THE JOY BUS$5,000
WOMEN'S BEAN PROJECT$5,000
GLOBALMINDED$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $89k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SAVING AMY INC: $25k → 11%DAMAR FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 16%ACTIVATE WORK INC: $25k → 12%HOPE WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $25k → 11%ARIZONA'S CHILDREN ASSOCIATION: $5k → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $4k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$415k · 6 repeat orgs$304k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
11

Total granted

$415k
$113k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+23%

Still filing today

100%
91%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $191k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationFood & NutritionEmploymentReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BF
    Butler Foundation
    4× · 2022–2025 · $300k · revenue -86% · 74% of their budget
  • DC
    Dayspring Center Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $62k · revenue +19%
  • WB
    WOMEN'S BEAN PROJECT
    3× · 2023–2025 · $23k · revenue -57%

Funded once

  • AW
    ACTIVATE WORK INC
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%
  • SA
    SAVING AMY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +208%
  • AD
    ARIZONA DIAMONDBACKS FOUNDATIONINCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +48%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arizona Wins

Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…

Civil Rights
2
Dress for Success Phoenix

To empower women to achieve economic independence by providing a network of support, professional attire and the development tools to help them thrive in work and in life.

Human Services
3
Nourishphx

Nourishphx (fka icm food & clothing bank) is the trusted community hub serving vulnerable individuals and families by offering resources to satisfy immediate needs and to provide pathways to self-sufficiency.

Human Services
4
Foster 360

Foster360 equips former clients of the foster care system to break the cycle of homelessness and abuse.

Human Services
5
New Hope Services Inc

Provide services in response to individual need

Human Services
6
Women Doing Well Inc

Women doing well exists to activate women towards greater purposeful generosity. this is accomplished by taking women through the women doing well pathway where they will learn their purpose, identify their passions, and create a plan to…

Education
7
Statewide Independent Living Council

Arizona Statewide Independent Living Council, AZSILC is one of 56 Statewide Independent Living Councils, SILCs which are federally mandated under the Rehabilitation Act. There is one SILC in each state and US territory. AZSILC members are…

Human Services
8
Arizona Cancer Foundation for Children Inc

Arizona Cancer Foundation for Children provides social, emotional, and financial support to families managing the health and well-being of a loved one with pediatric cancer.

Public Benefit
9
Arc of Arizona Inc

Advocates for the rights and participation of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. together with our network of members and affiliated chapters, we improve systems of support, connect families, inspire communication,…

—
10
Pro-Choice Arizona

Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…

Health
11
Lifeworks Services Inc

Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.

Human Services
12
Colorado Springs Independence Center

We work with people with disabilities, their families and the community to create independence so that all may thrive.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope Women's Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dress for Success Denver. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
13/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Butler Foundation: $300,000 · EducationButler Foundation+3 more: $25,000 · Education+3 moreACTIVATE WORK INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesACTIVATE WORK…HOPE WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesHOPE WOMEN'S …SAVING AMY INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesSAVING AMY IN…Damar Foundation Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesDamar Foundat…ARIZONA'S CHILDREN ASSOCIATION: $5,000 · Human ServicesARIZONA'S CHI…Hospice of the Valley: $3,500 · Human ServicesDayspring Center Inc: $61,533 · Housing & ShelterDayspring…TEAM CHAD: $25,000 · HealthTEAM CHADAMANDA HOPE RAINBOW ANGELS: $15,000 · HealthAMANDA HO…SOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH AND RESOURCE CENTER: $10,000 · HealthSOUTHWEST…NEW SHOE DAY FOUNDATION INC: $4,633 · HealthNEW SHOE …+2 more: $3,000 · HealthUPRISE: $15,000 · OtherUPRISEGREATER INDIANAPOLIS LITERACY LEAGUE INC: $15,000 · OtherGREATER INDIANAPO…THE CENTER FOR HABILITATION: $6,980 · OtherTHE CENTER FOR HA…Indy Hygiene Hub Inc: $25,000 · OtherIndy Hygiene Hub …STUDENT IMPACT OF WESTFIELD INC: $5,000 · OtherDress for Success Denver: $25,000 · OtherDress for Success…ARIZONA DIAMONDBACKS FOUNDATIONINC: $10,000 · OtherARIZONA DIAMONDBA…PATHWAYS KITCHEN: $5,000 · Other+3 more: $5,917 · OtherWOMEN'S BEAN PROJECT: $22,625 · EmploymentTHE CENTERS FOR HABILITATIONTCH: $16,045 · EmploymentWEDONTWASTE INC: $15,000 · Food & NutritionKITCHEN ON THE STREET INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionTHE JOY BUS: $5,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD 4 SOULS INC: $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
Education$325,000Human Services$88,500Housing & Shelter$61,533Health$57,633Other$112,897Employment$38,670Food & Nutrition$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetButler Foundation: $300,000 over 4y, 74% of budgetDayspring Center Inc: $61,533 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetACTIVATE WORK INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTEAM CHAD: $25,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetDress for Success Denver: $25,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetIndy Hygiene Hub Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetSAVING AMY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetWOMEN'S BEAN PROJECT: $22,625 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CENTERS FOR HABILITATIONTCH: $16,045 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMANDA HOPE RAINBOW ANGELS: $15,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetGREATER INDIANAPOLIS LITERACY LEAGUE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetARIZONA DIAMONDBACKS FOUNDATIONINC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKITCHEN ON THE STREET INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetTACT KIDS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH AND RESOURCE CENTER: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINDY BOOK PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetDamar Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTUDENT IMPACT OF WESTFIELD INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFOOD 4 SOULS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetARIZONA'S CHILDREN ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW SHOE DAY FOUNDATION INC: $4,633 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetHospice of the Valley: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMPTOWN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community Fou…Virginia G Piper Char…Thunderbirds CharitiesNina Mason Pulliam Ch…American Express Foun…John F Long Foundatio…The Foundation for Co…The Indianapolis Foun…Central Indiana Commu…The Albertsons Compan…Lilly Endowment IncSundt Foundation
Arizona Community FoundationAZ21× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Thunderbirds Charities · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · American Express Foundation · John F Long Foundation Inc · The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Lilly Endowment Inc · Sundt Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mj Insurance Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mj Insurance Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mj Insurance Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Mj Insurance Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mj Insurance’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home