· Private foundation
Mj Insurance Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k13 grants · $49k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $180k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BUTLER FOUNDATION | $75,000 |
| HOPE WOMEN'S CENTER INC | $25,000 |
| DRESS FOR SUCCESS DENVER | $25,000 |
| INDY HYGIENE HUB | $25,000 |
| TEAM CHAD | $25,000 |
| DAYSPRING CENTER | $20,000 |
| WE DON'T WASTE | $15,000 |
| ARMADA HOPE RAINBOW ANGELS | $15,000 |
| INDY READS | $15,000 |
| UPRISE | $15,000 |
| GLOBALMINDED | $5,000 |
| THE CENTERS FOR HABILITATION | $5,000 |
| PATHWAYS KITCHEN CORPORATION | $5,000 |
| SOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH & RESOURCE CTR | $5,000 |
| THE JOY BUS | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $89k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $191k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BFButler Foundation4× · 2022–2025 · $300k · revenue -86% · 74% of their budget
- DCDayspring Center Inc3× · 2023–2025 · $62k · revenue +19%
- WBWOMEN'S BEAN PROJECT3× · 2023–2025 · $23k · revenue -57%
Funded once
- AWACTIVATE WORK INCone grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%
- SASAVING AMY INCgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +208%
- ADARIZONA DIAMONDBACKS FOUNDATIONINCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +48%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…
To empower women to achieve economic independence by providing a network of support, professional attire and the development tools to help them thrive in work and in life.
People inc. provides health and human services that enrich lives and communities through innovation and supportive services. with a goal to help people achieve greater independence and quality of life, people inc. provides day,…
Nourishphx (fka icm food & clothing bank) is the trusted community hub serving vulnerable individuals and families by offering resources to satisfy immediate needs and to provide pathways to self-sufficiency.
Women doing well exists to activate women towards greater purposeful generosity. this is accomplished by taking women through the women doing well pathway where they will learn their purpose, identify their passions, and create a plan to…
Foster360 equips former clients of the foster care system to break the cycle of homelessness and abuse.
Arizona Cancer Foundation for Children provides social, emotional, and financial support to families managing the health and well-being of a loved one with pediatric cancer.
The mission of indiana wish is to grant wishes to indiana children ages 3 -18 diagnosed with a life-threatening illness.
Advocates for the rights and participation of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. together with our network of members and affiliated chapters, we improve systems of support, connect families, inspire communication,…
Our mission is to break the cycle of addiction and trauma for women, children, and families.
Goodwill's mission is to empower individuals, strengthen families, and inspire communities through job skills training and work placement opportunities with a multi-generational approach focused on removing barriers.
Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope Women's Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dress for Success Denver. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 15 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Butler Foundation ↗
- Who funds Dayspring Center Inc ↗
- Who funds ACTIVATE WORK INC ↗
- Who funds TEAM CHAD ↗
- Who funds Dress for Success Denver ↗
- Who funds Indy Hygiene Hub Inc ↗
- Who funds HOPE WOMEN'S CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SAVING AMY INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S BEAN PROJECT ↗
- Who funds THE CENTERS FOR HABILITATIONTCH ↗
- Who funds WEDONTWASTE INC ↗
- Who funds AMANDA HOPE RAINBOW ANGELS ↗
- Who funds GREATER INDIANAPOLIS LITERACY LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA DIAMONDBACKS FOUNDATIONINC ↗
- Who funds KITCHEN ON THE STREET INC ↗
- Who funds INDY BOOK PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH AND RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds TACT KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBALMINDED ↗
- Who funds PATHWAYS KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds Damar Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds STUDENT IMPACT OF WESTFIELD INC ↗
- Who funds THE JOY BUS ↗
- Who funds FOOD 4 SOULS INC ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA'S CHILDREN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds NEW SHOE DAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Hospice of the Valley ↗
- Who funds Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds BARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CAMPTOWN INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Thunderbirds Charities · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · American Express Foundation · John F Long Foundation Inc · The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Lilly Endowment Inc · Sundt Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Mj Insurance Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Mj Insurance Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Mj Insurance Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.