· Public charity
Missionary Supply Lines Inc
The purpose of Missionary Supply Lines, Inc is to advance the work of the Lord Jesus Christ on Earth.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k13 grants · $39k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $139k
- $250k+2 grants · $1.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Planted Ministries | $580,000 |
| Immanuel Schools | $515,000 |
| Students International | $37,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $23,700 |
| Individual grant recipient | $14,295 |
| Kingsburg First Baptist Church | $12,000 |
| Community Missionary Outreach | $12,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| Kingsburg Community Assistance | $10,000 |
| The Mentoring Project | $10,000 |
| First Love International Ministries | $10,000 |
| Show Hope Orphan Adoption | $7,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| Dosa Church San Diego | $5,000 |
| Helps Ministries | $4,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $108k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against -11% for the ones you funded once.
19 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $73k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PMPLANTED MINISTRIES4× · 2021–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +109% · 99% of their budget
- SISTUDENTS INTERNATIONAL5× · 2020–2024 · $206k · revenue +48%
- KCKingsburg Community Assistance Program Kingsburg Community Assistance Program6× · 2017–2024 · $108k · revenue +59%
Funded once
- HKHerb Knight Community Center2× · 2023–2024 · $33k
- YLYoung Life Internationalone grant, 2020 · $24k
- SLStorehouse LLCone grant, 2023 · $14k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Helping others live in freedom of Christ by knowing and living by the truths set for in God's word, the Holy Bible.
Transforming lives in the Ville through access to supportive services and efficacy.
To spread the Gospel of Jesus the Christ
City Changers strives to reach the impoverished community with the love of Jesus Christ by offering community and religious services.
Christ-based ministry with the mission of bringing hope and encouragement with christ-like love to emotionally hurting people through mental health counseling and transitonal housing for homeless women with mental illness.
We are a Christian organization. The mission of this ministry is to preach the Gospel to all nations through the guidance of the Holy Spirit, declare God's glory among the nations and His marvelous deeds.
Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ
Mobilization of churches in America by taking pastors and laymen on vision and service trips overseas in fulfillment of Jesus command to go ye into all the world, making disciples...
Missions Ministries provide physical and spiritual assistance to poverty level families through existing churches in Juarez Mexico.
A Christian ministry dedicated to reaching out and serving the needs of the poor and homeless of our community.
Supporing missionaries worldwide
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kingsburg Community Assistance Program Kingsburg Community Assistance Program and the most unlike its peers is House of Hope. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PLANTED MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds Community Missionary Outreach ↗
- Who funds STUDENTS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds Kingsburg Community Assistance Program Kingsburg Community Assistance Program ↗
- Who funds FIRST LOVE INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds CAPITOL COMMISSION INC ↗
- Who funds OPEN GATE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF HOPE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Missionary Supply Lines Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.