Skip to content

· Public charity

Mission Free School of St Louis Dba St Louis Unitarian Fdn for Children

The school's primary purpose is to assist programs that benefit underprivileged children.

$291k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
—
States reached
$46k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$614kEducation$368kHealth$298kYouth Development$142kCrime & Legal$126kCivil Rights$40kCommunity Improvement$16k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$22,500
Median grant
—
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER$46,200
NURSES FOR NEWBORNS$24,100
ST LOUIS CRISIS NURSERY$23,600
KIDS IN THE MIDDLE$23,300
GIRLS INC$23,300
FAMILY FORWARD$23,100
ST LOUIS ARC$22,500
SPRINGBOARD TO LEARNING$20,900
EPWORTH CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES$20,300
CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER$19,300
ASHREI FOUNDATION$16,200
THE WOMEN'S SAFE HOUSE$14,000
CHADS COALITION FOR MENTAL HEALTH$14,000
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 15 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
1

Total granted

$1.6M
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+139%

Still filing today

73%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SE
    SOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $264k · revenue +62%
  • NF
    NURSES FOR NEWBORNS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $137k · revenue +16%
  • SL
    ST LOUIS CRISIS NURSERY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $134k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • II
    INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUISgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +139%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Louis Survivors' Legal Support Inc

SLSLS provides victims of domestic violence the assistance they need in filing petitions for orders of protection and obtaining full orders of protection in court.

Crime & Legal
2
Casa of St Louis

Casa of st. louis advocates for abused and neglected children and youth in st. louis by representing their best interests in court and in the community. our vision is that every child lives in a safe permanent home and has the opportunity…

Civil Rights
3
St Louis Community Foundation

To promote the possibilities of charitable giving, helping charitable citizens understand how they can effectively provide for the community they love and the causes they care deeply about.

Philanthropy
4
St Martin's Child Center

Providing day care services to infants and children of low income families in northern st. louis county, missouri

—
5
Mission St Louis

Mission: st. louis empowers individuals for social and economic growth through relationships and opportunity.

Community Improvement
6
St Louis Economic Development Partnership

Economic development.

—
7
St Louis Association of Community Organizations

Community Development and Community Center and social services

—
8
Special Olympics Missouri Inc

Through year-round sports and training, individuals with intellectual disabilities are given the chance to gain confidence, seek opportunities to improve their physical fitness, demonstrate pride, and participate in their communities.

—
9
Child Safe of Central Missouri Inc

Child safe of central missouri's mission is to respond to and prevent child abuse by providing advocacy, support, and resources to children who are alleged victims of abuse and other traumatic crimes, and to their non-offending family…

Crime & Legal
10
Greater St Louis Inc

Greater st. louis, inc. brings together business and civic leaders to create jobs, drive inclusive economic growth, and increase the st. louis metro area's global competitiveness. we speak with a unified voice, lead with a bold agenda, and…

Community Improvement
11
Behavioral Health Network of Greater St

Behavioral Health Network is a collaborative effort of providers working together to improve our community by leading behavioral health planning and coordination.

Health
12
St Louis Sports Commission Inc

Foster economic growth and improved quality of life in the st. louis area by producing events, enhancing its national and international image as a premier sports region, and increasing community awareness of the value of sports.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Louis Crisis Nursery; the most unlike its peers is Chads Coalition for Mental Health. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $263,800 · Human ServicesSOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTERNURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $136,600 · Human ServicesNURSES FOR NEWBORNSST LOUIS ARC INC: $127,400 · Human ServicesST LOUIS ARC INCST MARTHA'S HALL: $72,400 · Human ServicesST MARTHA'S HALLPROMO FUND: $40,200 · Human ServicesPROMO FUNDTHE WOMEN'S SAFE HOUSE: $34,400 · Human Services+2 more: $26,200 · Human ServicesST LOUIS CRISIS NURSERY: $133,600 · OtherST LOUIS CRISIS NURSERYKIDS IN THE MIDDLE INC: $131,750 · OtherKIDS IN THE MIDDLE INCFAMILY FORWARD: $130,600 · OtherFAMILY FORWARDEPWORTH CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES: $101,100 · OtherEPWORTH CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICESCURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI: $92,500 · OtherCURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURIPAYBACK INC: $43,500 · OtherPAYBACK INCGIRLS INCORPORATED OF ST LOUIS: $131,750 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS INC…SPRINGBOARD TO LEARNING INC: $104,200 · Civil RightsCHADS COALITION FOR MENTAL HEALTH: $34,400 · Health
Human Services$701,000Other$633,050Youth Development$131,750Civil Rights$104,200Health$34,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $263,800 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetNURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $136,600 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetST LOUIS CRISIS NURSERY: $133,600 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF ST LOUIS: $131,750 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetKIDS IN THE MIDDLE INC: $131,750 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetST LOUIS ARC INC: $127,400 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSPRINGBOARD TO LEARNING INC: $104,200 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetST MARTHA'S HALL: $72,400 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetPROMO FUND: $40,200 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetCHADS COALITION FOR MENTAL HEALTH: $34,400 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S SAFE HOUSE: $34,400 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetINTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NURSES FOR NEWBORNS ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS CRISIS NURSERY ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds KIDS IN THE MIDDLE INC ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS ARC INC ↗
  • Who funds SPRINGBOARD TO LEARNING INC ↗
  • Who funds ST MARTHA'S HALL ↗
  • Who funds PROMO FUND ↗
  • Who funds CHADS COALITION FOR MENTAL HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds THE WOMEN'S SAFE HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Ashrei Foundation ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO25.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Jordan Mary R & Ettie a Charitable · Norman J Stupp Foundation · Pott Foundation · Trio Foundation of St Louis · Edward Jones Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mission Free School of St Louis Dba St Louis Unitarian Fdn for Children funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mission Free School of St Louis Dba St Louis Unitarian Fdn for Children. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mission Free School of St Louis Dba St Louis Unitarian Fdn for Children?

    Find your warmest path to Mission Free School of St Louis Dba St Louis Unitarian Fdn for Children through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mission Free School of St Louis Dba St Louis Unitarian Fdn for Children’s filings →

    More from the funding graph