Skip to content
Mission 117 at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Mission 117

We offer positive opportunities and relationships for foster youth and at- risk families that will support them into becoming healthy and responsible contributors to society.

$8k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2022.

Human Services$113kHousing & Shelter$40kHealth$20kReligion$20k
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$7,719
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FEDERATION OF YOUTH SERVICES$7,719
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $115k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COMPREHENSIVE YOUTH: $20k → 10%RIVER JORDAN: $20k → 14%ENNIS CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $20k → 16%STARFISH FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 21%JUDSON CENTER: $20k → 8%CHILDREN'S CENTER: $20k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Concern - Professional Services for Children Youth and Families

Concern's mission: concern brings hope, offers opportunity, and inspires change. concern's vision: to encourage growth and promote positive healthy lives.

Human Services
2
Youth Crisis Center Inc

The mission of YCC is to build a healthier community by empowering young people and families to rise above adversity.

Human Services
3
Nexus-Path Family Healing

Strengthening lives, families, and communities through our cornerstone values.

Human Services
4
Citrus Health Network Inc

To provide primary care and behavioral health services to children, adults, and families in south florida across a broad range of health services and community-based programs; and to oversee the coordinated child welfare system of care…

—
5
Northeast Center for Youth and Families Inc

Provide a range of high-quality, community-based, behavioral health services to empower individuals and families to live healthy and successful lives.

Human Services
6
Community Care

To provide quality community-based services that are timely and effective in promoting the health and well being of individuals and their families.

Human Services
7
Family and Children's Services of Centra

To transform the lives of children and adults by providing opportunities to build self-confidence, resilience and hope.

Human Services
8
Central Care Management Organization
—
9
Children's Bureau Inc

Empowering individuals to build stronger families and communities.

Human Services
10
Tabor Children's Services Inc

Through a wide range of child welfare services, our mission is to keep children & youth safe, strengthen families & promote the independence of youth & families.

Human Services
11
Cedars Youth Services Inc

To help children and youth achieve safety, stability, and enduring family relationships. cedars founding and enduring priority is safety for children and youth who have experienced, or are vulnerable to, abuse, neglect and/or homelessness.

Arts & Culture
12
Juneau Youth Services Inc

Responding to the behavioral health needs of alaska's children.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ennis Center for Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is River Jordan Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMPREHENSIVE YOUTH SERVICES INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesCOMPREHENSIVE YOUTH SERVICES INCJUDSON CENTER INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesJUDSON CENTER INCCHILDRENS CENTER OF WAYNE COUNTY INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesCHILDRENS CENTER OF WAYNE COUNTY INCENNIS CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesENNIS CENTER FOR CHILDREN INCRIVER JORDAN INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesRIVER JORDAN INCSTARFISH FAMILY SERVICES INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesSTARFISH FAMILY SERVICES INCBRUGMANSIA COUNSELING GROUP PLLC: $20,000 · OtherBRUGMANSIA COUNSELING …4KIDS OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $10,000 · Other4KIDS OF SOUTH FLORIDA…FEDERATION OF YOUTH SERVICES: $7,719 · OtherFEDERATION OF YOUTH SE…BRIGHTMOOR CHRISTIAN CHURCH ENDOWMENT FUND: $20,000 · ReligionBRIGHTMOOR …SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterSLEEP IN HE…
Human Services$115,000Other$37,719Religion$20,000Housing & Shelter$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMPREHENSIVE YOUTH SERVICES INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBRIGHTMOOR CHRISTIAN CHURCH ENDOWMENT FUND: $20,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetJUDSON CENTER INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDRENS CENTER OF WAYNE COUNTY INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetENNIS CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRIVER JORDAN INC: $20,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetSTARFISH FAMILY SERVICES INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEDERATION OF YOUTH SERVICES: $7,719 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Canton Community Foun…United Way for Southe…Charities Aid Foundat…The Blackbaud Giving …Network for GoodAmazonsmile Foundation
Canton Community Foundation IncMI13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Canton Community Foundation Inc · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Network for Good · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mission 117 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mission 117. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mission 117’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home