Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Mission 117

We offer positive opportunities and relationships for foster youth and at- risk families that will support them into becoming healthy and responsible contributors to society.

$8k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212022.

Human Services$113kHousing & Shelter$40kHealth$20kReligion$20k
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$7,719
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FEDERATION OF YOUTH SERVICES$7,719
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $115k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COMPREHENSIVE YOUTH: $20k → 10%RIVER JORDAN: $20k → 14%ENNIS CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $20k → 16%STARFISH FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 21%JUDSON CENTER: $20k → 8%CHILDREN'S CENTER: $20k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Concern - Professional Services for Children Youth and Families

Concern's mission: concern brings hope, offers opportunity, and inspires change. concern's vision: to encourage growth and promote positive healthy lives.

Human Services
2
Youth Crisis Center Inc

The mission of YCC is to build a healthier community by empowering young people and families to rise above adversity.

Human Services
3
Nexus-Path Family Healing

Strengthening lives, families, and communities through our cornerstone values.

Human Services
4
Citrus Health Network Inc

To provide primary care and behavioral health services to children, adults, and families in south florida across a broad range of health services and community-based programs; and to oversee the coordinated child welfare system of care…

5
Northeast Center for Youth and Families Inc

Provide a range of high-quality, community-based, behavioral health services to empower individuals and families to live healthy and successful lives.

Human Services
6
Community Care

To provide quality community-based services that are timely and effective in promoting the health and well being of individuals and their families.

Human Services
7
Family and Children's Services of Centra

To transform the lives of children and adults by providing opportunities to build self-confidence, resilience and hope.

Human Services
8
Central Care Management Organization
9
Children's Bureau Inc

Empowering individuals to build stronger families and communities.

Human Services
10
Tabor Children's Services Inc

Through a wide range of child welfare services, our mission is to keep children & youth safe, strengthen families & promote the independence of youth & families.

Human Services
11
Cedars Youth Services Inc

To help children and youth achieve safety, stability, and enduring family relationships. cedars founding and enduring priority is safety for children and youth who have experienced, or are vulnerable to, abuse, neglect and/or homelessness.

Arts & Culture
12
Juneau Youth Services Inc

Responding to the behavioral health needs of alaska's children.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ennis Center for Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is River Jordan Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COMPREHENSIVE YOUTH SERVICES INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesCOMPREHENSIVE YOUTH SERVICES INCCHILDRENS CENTER OF WAYNE COUNTY INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesCHILDRENS CENTER OF WAYNE COUNTY INCJUDSON CENTER INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesJUDSON CENTER INCENNIS CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesENNIS CENTER FOR CHILDREN INCRIVER JORDAN INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesRIVER JORDAN INCSTARFISH FAMILY SERVICES INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesSTARFISH FAMILY SERVICES INCBRUGMANSIA COUNSELING GROUP PLLC — $20,000 · OtherBRUGMANSIA COUNSELING …4KIDS OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $10,000 · Other4KIDS OF SOUTH FLORIDA…FEDERATION OF YOUTH SERVICES — $7,719 · OtherFEDERATION OF YOUTH SE…BRIGHTMOOR CHRISTIAN CHURCH ENDOWMENT FUND — $20,000 · ReligionBRIGHTMOOR …SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC — $20,000 · Housing & ShelterSLEEP IN HE…
Human Services$115,000Other$37,719Religion$20,000Housing & Shelter$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMPREHENSIVE YOUTH SERVICES INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBRIGHTMOOR CHRISTIAN CHURCH ENDOWMENT FUND — $20,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCHILDRENS CENTER OF WAYNE COUNTY INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJUDSON CENTER INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetENNIS CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRIVER JORDAN INC — $20,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetSTARFISH FAMILY SERVICES INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEDERATION OF YOUTH SERVICES — $7,719 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Canton Community Foundation IncMI13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Canton Community Foundation Inc · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Network for Good · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Mission 117 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph