Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Misco Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$27k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$64kReligion$23kArts & Culture$8kHuman Services$7kEducation$5kInternational$3kRecreation & Sports$2kHealth$250Other$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $24k
$500
Median grant
4
States reached
$236k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY$12,000
CONGREGATION BETH SHALOM$11,615
KANSAS CITY AUTOMOTIVE MUSEUM INC$1,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$500
CAMPERSHIPS FOR NEBAGAMON$500
JOHN AUSTIN CHELEY FOUNDATION$500
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KCUR$250
WICHITA FAMILY CRISIS CENTER$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 20% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WICHITA FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $250 → 16%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$44k · 10 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
6

Total granted

$44k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+105%

Still filing today

50%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyEducationRecreation & SportsArts & CultureHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CB
    CONGREGATION BETH SHALOM
    4× · 2019–2025 · $22k
  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER KANSAS CITY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +11%
  • DA
    DREAM A WORLD EDUCATION INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $3k · revenue -76%

Funded once

  • KM
    KEMPER MUSEUM
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICESgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +105%
  • VL
    VICTORY LIFE CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mid-Kansas Jewish Federation Inc

Build, strengthen, and preserve jewish identity within the local community, in israel, and around the world through tzedakah, education, and cultural events.

Religion
2
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

3
Jewish Federation of Nashville and Middle Tennessee

The jewish federation of nashville is the central voluntary communal organization of the jewish community. through its fund-raising, planning and community relations efforts, either independently or in partnership with other jewish…

Philanthropy
4
Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Kansas City

The mission of the jewish community foundation of greater kansas city is to promote the practice of tzedakah (righteousness, charity) and the pursuit of tikkun olam (repairing the world) by serving as the central resource and advocate for…

Philanthropy
5
Kaiserman Jewish Community Center

The kaiserman jewish community center aspires to be the premier multi-generational hub of non-denominational jewish activity. we strive to positively impact the wellness of the mind, body and spirit in an inclusive environment for this and…

Recreation & Sports
6
Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life

KU Hillel's mission is to connect Jewish students to each other and to their Judaism, to inspire and equip the next generation of Jewish leaders, and to build a thriving Jewish community on campus.

7
Jewish Family Service of Greater New Hav

Jewish family service of greater new haven (jfsgnh) supports and strengthens individual, family, and community life by providing a wide range of social services. we welcome people of all ages, races, ethnicities, sexual orientations,…

Human Services
8
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
9
Jewish Community Centers Association of North America

Jcc association strengthens jewish life in north america through direct service to affiliate jccs, ym-ywha's and camps and by providing leadership and guidance to the jcc movement. in addition, we serve jewish personnel in the armed forces…

Human Services
10
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis

Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.

Human Services
11
The Jewish Community Center in Manhattan Inc

Together with our community, jcc manhattan creates opportunities for people to connect, grow, and learn within an ever-changing jewish landscape.

Human Services
12
Jewish Communal Fund

To facilitate and promote philanthropy through donor advised funds.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Greater Kansas City and the most unlike its peers is Camp Nebagamon Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY — $63,750 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITYJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER KANSAS CITY — $5,800 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER KANSAS CITYCONGREGATION BETH SHALOM — $22,140 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH SHALOMDREAM A WORLD EDUCATION INC — $2,500 · OtherDREAM A WORLD EDUCATION INCIndividual grant recipient — $2,060 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKCUR-FM co University of Missouri-Kansas City — $2,000 · OtherKCUR-FM co University of Missouri-…KCUR — $2,000 · OtherKCURKEMPER MUSEUM — $1,440 · Other+5 more — $2,500 · Other+5 moreJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $2,500 · InternationalCAMP NEBAGAMON FOUNDATION — $2,500 · EducationKANSAS CITY AUTOMOTIVE MUSEUM INC — $2,200 · Arts & CultureJOHN AUSTIN CHELEY FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 · Recreation & SportsJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES — $1,000 · Human ServicesWICHITA FAMILY CRISIS CENTER — $250 · Human ServicesAUTISM SPEAKS INC — $250 · Health
Philanthropy$69,550Other$34,640International$2,500Education$2,500Arts & Culture$2,200Recreation & Sports$2,000Human Services$1,250Health$250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY — $63,750 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER KANSAS CITY — $5,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDREAM A WORLD EDUCATION INC — $2,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCAMP NEBAGAMON FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetKANSAS CITY AUTOMOTIVE MUSEUM INC — $2,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJOHN AUSTIN CHELEY FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWICHITA FAMILY CRISIS CENTER — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER KANSAS CITY
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC
  • Who funds DREAM A WORLD EDUCATION INC
  • Who funds CAMP NEBAGAMON FOUNDATION
  • Who funds KANSAS CITY AUTOMOTIVE MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds JOHN AUSTIN CHELEY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES
  • Who funds WICHITA FAMILY CRISIS CENTER
  • Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Misco Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph