Skip to content

· Private foundation

Miriam H Merin Charitable Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$335k
Granted FY2021
6
Grants FY2021
3
States reached
$100k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

72% of Miriam H Merin Charitable Foundation’s FY2022 grant dollars went to National Philanthropic Trust, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 6 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Miriam H Merin Charitable Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $335k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
’18
6
’19
9
’20
5
’21
6
’22

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2022.

Philanthropy$705kCivil Rights$275kHousing & Shelter$250kHealth$214kInternational$210kHuman Services$180kFood & Nutrition$85kCrime & Legal$65kOther$0
02FY2021 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $280k
$50,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WHERE DO WE GO BERKELEY$100,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$80,000
JCC EAST BAY$50,000
CONSIDER THE HOMELESS$50,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NORTHERN CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY$30,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $330k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WHERE DO WE GO BERKELEY: $100k → 10%WHERE DO WE GO BERKELEY: $50k → 10%JCC EAST BAY: $120k → 10%JCC EAST BAY: $50k → 10%JCC EAST BAY: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
OR
SD
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MD
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$990k · 9 repeat orgs$399k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +66% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2021, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
9

Total granted

$990k
$324k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
+13%

Still filing today

89%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22
HealthCrime & LegalHuman ServicesCivil RightsFood & NutritionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    4× · 2018–2022 · $210k · revenue +89%
  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF THE EAST BAY
    3× · 2019–2021 · $180k · revenue +584%
  • WD
    Where Do We Go Berkeley
    2× · 2021–2022 · $150k · revenue +56% · 94% of their budget

Funded once

  • LA
    LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2020 · $75k · revenue -1%
  • BL
    BLACK LIVES MATTER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue 0%
  • RI
    RESIST INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +242%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
2
The Public Interest Law Center

The Public Interest Law Center uses high-impact legal strategies to advance the civil, social, and economic rights of communities in the Philadelphia region facing discrimination, inequality, and poverty. We use litigation, community…

Crime & Legal
3
Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area

As one of the most enduring civil rights institutions on the West Coast, we work to dismantle systems of oppression and racism, and build an equitable and just society.

—
4
Inner City Law Center

In 2024, Inner City Law Center, ICLC, served over 3,400 people, helping vulnerable Angelenos to remain in their homes and recover nearly $20.5 million in financial benefits.

Crime & Legal
5
American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California

The american civil liberties union of northern california (aclu nc union) defends and advances the principles of freedom, equality and justice contained in the united states constitution. aclu nc union, a california mutual benefit…

—
6
Nijc Nfp

The National Immigrant Justice Center (NIJC) is a leader in advancing immigrant rights through its unique strategy drawing on its legal services to promote legal reform through litigation, advocacy and strategic communications.

Crime & Legal
7
Equal Justice Society

The Equal Justice Society (EJS) is transforming the nations consciousness on racethrough law, social science, and the arts. EJS works to dismantle structural andinstitutional racism to advance robust equal protection under the Fourteenth…

Civil Rights
8
Forward Together

Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…

Health
9
National Veterans Legal Services Program Inc

To provide at no cost legal assistance to veterans of the u.s. armed forces and current service members.

—
10
Liberty Justice Center

To advance economic and social liberties and a free enterprise society through strategic litigation, training, communication, activism and research. in addition, the center will train law students, lawyers and policy activists in the…

Crime & Legal
11
Transgender Law Center

Transgender Law Center TLC changes law, policy and attitudes so that all people can live safely, authentically, and free from discrimination regardless of their gender identity or expression.

Civil Rights
12
New Civil Liberties Alliance

Public interest legal activities

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Philanthropic Trust; the most unlike its peers is Where Do We Go Berkeley. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $705,342 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUSTJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF THE EAST BAY: $180,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY …Where Do We Go Berkeley: $150,000 · Human ServicesWhere Do We Go Be…LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $75,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES REGIO…ARTS COUNCIL GTR NEW HAVEN: $60,000 · OtherARTS COUNCIL GTR …Individual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant …BLACK LIVES MATTER FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherBLACK LIVES MATTE…RESIST INC: $50,000 · OtherRESIST INCNAACP: $25,000 · OtherNAACP+1 more: $4,200 · OtherMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $210,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SA…PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NORTHERN CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY INC: $140,000 · HealthPLANNED PAR…PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $60,000 · HealthPLANNED PAR…Translifeline DBA Trans Lifeline: $10,000 · HealthSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $50,000 · Crime & LegalNative American Heritage Association: $50,000 · Crime & LegalNATIONAL CRIME VICTIM LAW INSTITUTE: $15,000 · Crime & LegalConsider The Homeless: $100,000 · Food & NutritionCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc: $10,000 · Food & NutritionNATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC: $50,000 · Civil RightsREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $50,000 · Civil Rights
Philanthropy$705,342Human Services$330,000Other$314,200International$210,000Health$210,000Crime & Legal$115,000Food & Nutrition$110,000Civil Rights$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $705,342 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $210,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF THE EAST BAY: $180,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetWhere Do We Go Berkeley: $150,000 over 2y, 94% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NORTHERN CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY INC: $140,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetConsider The Homeless: $100,000 over 2y, 67% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLACK LIVES MATTER FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetRESIST INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNative American Heritage Association: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL CRIME VICTIM LAW INSTITUTE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTranslifeline DBA Trans Lifeline: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA10.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Miriam H Merin Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Miriam H Merin Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • National Crime Victim Law Institute: 5% of income from government
  • Resist Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Miriam H Merin Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Miriam H Merin Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Miriam H Merin’s filings →

More from the funding graph