· Private foundation
Miranifoundationorg Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k16 grants · $35k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KIVA | $15,000 |
| LUV & KUSH INC | $10,000 |
| VARIOUS DONATIONS LESS THAN 500 EACH | $7,030 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HELP AGE INDIA | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,680 |
| LOTUS OF LIGHT CENTRE | $2,200 |
| OASIS INSTITUTE | $2,000 |
| SUBWAY HOMELESS LUNCH | $2,000 |
| N HER FOOTSTEPS | $2,000 |
| DONORS CHOOSE ORG | $2,000 |
| CATTYWAMPUS PUPPET COUNCIL | $2,000 |
| EAST SIDE SUNDAY MARKET | $1,500 |
| KNOXVILLE JAZZ ORCHESTRA | $1,500 |
| SEEDS & BRIDGES INC | $1,200 |
| FRIENDS TOGO INC | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SISEEED INC3× · 2017–2023 · $4k · revenue +207%
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC3× · 2021–2025 · $4k · revenue +20%- SFSHORA FOUNDATION2× · 2018–2019 · $3k · revenue +87%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $5k
- APAKSHYA PATRA FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $5k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2024 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the foundation is to simultaneously address childhood hunger and malnutrition and to promote education for children throughout india.
Keralink international works to end avoidable blindness by developing, delivering, and scaling affordable solutions for all, powered by innovative technology and partnerships.
The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…
Glean kentucky nourishes kentucky's hungry by rescuing and redistributing surplus fresh foods.
Rise against hunger, inc. is an international hunger relief non-profit organization that is driven by a vision of a world without hunger and a mission to end hunger in our lifetime. rise against hunger distributes food and other…
Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.
Accelerate the transformation to a healthy, sustainable and equitable food system.
World hunger relief institute equips people to alleviate hunger through education, research, and sustainable agriculture.
The greater chicago food depository is the nonprofit food bank serving cook county. our mission - is to end hunger. we believe food is a basic human right. to achieve our mission, we work in partnership with a network of community-based…
On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…
To lead a network of partners and unite the community to eliminate hunger by feeding, nourishing, and empowering those we serve.
Food for the hungry is a christian humanitarian aid and global development organization that has designed, developed and delivered solutions for more than 50 years so that children, families and communities can flourish. (continued on…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlanta Community Food Bank Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cattywampus Puppet Council. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 105 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds KIVA MICROFUNDS ↗
- Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HELPAGE INDIA INC ↗
- Who funds EAST TENNESSEE TECHNOLOGY ACCESS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
- Who funds SEEED INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds MEANINGFUL LIFE CENTER ↗
- Who funds SHORA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds CATTYWAMPUS PUPPET COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds The Life You Can Save ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: East Tennessee Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Boyd Foundation · Perceptics Foundation · Trinity Health Foundation of East Tennessee · United Way of Greater Knoxvilleinc · Thompson Charitable Foundation · The Clayton Homes Foundation · Truist Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Miranifoundationorg Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.