Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mira W Miskin Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$77k
Granted FY2020
25
Grants FY2020
6
States reached
$66k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

99% of Mira W Miskin Foundation’s FY2021 grant dollars went to National Philanthropic Trust, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2021 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Mira W Miskin Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 13 organizations, $77k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

15
’17
17
’18
14
’19
13
’20
1
’21

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Philanthropy$739kReligion$28kArts & Culture$24kHealth$18kEducation$10kCivil Rights$1kFood & Nutrition$950Human Services$938Other$0
02FY2020 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k24 grants · $11k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $66k
$200
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE JEWISH FEDERATION$66,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL MUSEUM$5,000
SINAI TEMPLE$1,800
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING$500
LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC$500
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF YAD VASHEM$250
AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION$250
MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$250
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$250
BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL$250
HILLEL INTERNATIONAL CHAI SOCIETY$200
THE JEWISH ACADEMY$200
JEWISH HEALING CENTER$200
FRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC$200
MAZON$150
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $300) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE BLUE CARD INC: $200 → 17%MEALS ON WHEELS WEST: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
PA
CA
VA
MD
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of Mira W Miskin Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 23% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 0%.

Mira W Miskin Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$185k · 36 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

36 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2020, 14 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
23

Total granted

$185k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
-1%

Still filing today

42%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
HealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER
    3× · 2017–2021 · $6k · revenue +63%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $900 · revenue +213%
  • AM
    AMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING
    3× · 2017–2019 · $800 · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • AJ
    AMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -20%
  • IM
    INTERNATIONAL MARCH OF THE LIVING I
    one grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue -62%
  • TR
    THE RETINA VITREOUS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue -77%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Doheny Eye Institute

To further the conservation, improvement and restoration of human eyesight" (mrs. doheny - 1947).

—
2
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
3
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
4
Brightfocus Foundation

Brightfocus foundation funds exceptional research worldwide to defeat alzheimer's disease, macular degeneration, and glaucoma and provides expert information on these heartbreaking diseases. please refer to schedule o for a complete…

Health
5
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
6
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
7
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
8
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
9
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
10
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
11
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
12
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed Israel Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Retina Vitreous Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
17/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $617,012 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST+3 more: $1,150 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FEDERATION: $122,000 · OtherTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONSINAI TEMPLE: $26,350 · OtherSINAI TEMPLEAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL MUSEUM: $15,100 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRA…+37 more: $12,845 · Other+37 moreAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationINTERNATIONAL MARCH OF THE LIVING I: $6,450 · Education+1 more: $150 · EducationCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $6,000 · HealthTHE RETINA VITREOUS FOUNDATION: $1,000 · HealthFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC: $900 · HealthAmerican Diabetes Association: $850 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $500 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $500 · HealthTHE GLAUCOMA FOUNDATION INC: $400 · Health+3 more: $600 · HealthThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $750 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $500 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $500 · Arts & CultureTHE BLUE CARD INC: $200 · Human ServicesAARP FOUNDATION: $130 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WHEELS WEST: $100 · Human ServicesLOS ANGELES MISSION INC: $200 · Housing & Shelter
Philanthropy$618,162Other$176,295Education$16,600Health$10,750Arts & Culture$1,750Human Services$430Housing & Shelter$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $617,012 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RETINA VITREOUS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC: $900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $850 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING: $800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger: $650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GLAUCOMA FOUNDATION INC: $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetParkinson Research Foundation Inc: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BLUE CARD INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCONCERN FOUNDATION: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAARP FOUNDATION: $130 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS WEST: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL CHILDRENS CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVENTURE FOR AMERICA INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MARCH OF THE LIVING I ↗
  • Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE RETINA VITREOUS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GLAUCOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES MISSION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Chesed Ahavah FoundationNY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Chesed Ahavah Foundation · Melvyn & Irene Greenstein Family Foundation · Joseph H Feldman Family Foundation Inc · F G Foundation · The Rav-Noy Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mira W Miskin Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mira W Miskin Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mira W Miskin’s filings →

    More from the funding graph