Skip to content
Minnreg Veterans Association Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Minnreg Veterans Association Inc

Local association of employees with social, education and recreational activities.

$38k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Human Services$82kEducation$63kHealth$20kFood & Nutrition$7k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $36,618, the rows itemized in this filing. The $38,322 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,704 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$6,109
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PINELLAS EDUCATION FOUNDATION$10,000
MORGAN FITZGERALD MIDDLE SCHOOL$8,509
FAMILY ENRICHMENT SERVICES$6,109
STOP THE MOVEMENT$6,000
READY FOR LIFE$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $39k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%STOP THE MOVEMENT: $6k → 12%READY FOR LIFE: $8k → 12%READY FOR LIFE: $7k → 12%READY FOR LIFE: $6k → 12%FAMILY ENRICHMENT SERVICES: $6k → 12%FAMILY ENRICHMENT SERVICES: $6k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$141k · 6 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
3

Total granted

$141k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+60%

Still filing today

83%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PINELLAS COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $40k · revenue +15%
  • AA
    ANGELS AGAINST ABUSE INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $33k · revenue +8%
  • RF
    READY FOR LIFE INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $21k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • LO
    LOTZ OF BLESSINGS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +59%
  • JH
    JOHNS HOPKINS ALL CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue +60%
  • IF
    INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Children's Home Inc

To unlock the potential of at-risk children and families by providing compassionate and effective services that create opportunities for success.

Health
2
Children's Advocacy Center of Southwest Florida Inc

Since 1981, children's advocacy center of southwest florida, inc. (cac) has advocated for a healthy, safe community for children through a multidisciplinary team approach to child abuse and neglect. our mission is to create a safe and…

Human Services
3
Family Resources Inc

We inspire well-being & success in the lives of vulnerable children, youth & families through responsive quality programs and safe places. part iii - additional information family counseling parents and youth ages 6-17 can receive…

Human Services
4
Suncoast Center Inc

For 80 years, suncoast center, inc. has held true to its mission of "strengthening, protecting, and restoring lives for a healthy community" by providing a comprehensive range of evidence-based services that address emotional wellness,…

Health
5
Child Protection Center Inc

The mission of the child protection center, inc. is the prevention, intervention and treatment of child abuse. we envision a community where children are safe from abuse and free to thrive. to successfully address the issue of child abuse,…

Crime & Legal
6
The Florida Center for Early Childhood Inc

The florida center supports the healthy development of young children, specializing in those with delays, disabilities or mental health challenges. our mission- "to help build and foster strong families and expand the potential of young…

Human Services
7
Pinebrook Family Answers

The agency's mission states "pinebrook family answers nurtures and empowers children, adults and families by providing mental health services and community-based programs throughout the greater lehigh valley. we do this through initiatives…

Human Services
8
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
9
The Parent Child Ctr of Tulsa Inc

To prevent child abuse and neglect through education, treatment, and advocacy. the parent child center of tulsa (pcct) has been serving the tulsa community and surrounding areas since 1990. in 2024, pcct served more than 96,000 infants,…

—
10
East Tennessee Children's Hospital Association Inc

East tennessee children's hospital is a free-standing, independent, not-for-profit pediatric health care system which serves the east tennessee region. children's hospital is certified by the state of tennessee as a comprehensive regional…

Health
11
Safe Children Coalition Inc

The safe children coalition's mission is to protect children and youth, strengthen families, and build community.

Human Services
12
Childrens Advocacy Center of Collin County Inc

The mission of children's advocacy center of collin county is to provide safety, healing, and justice to children victimized by abuse and neglect.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ready for Life Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lotz of Blessings Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

READY FOR LIFE INC: $20,721 · Human ServicesREADY FOR LIFE INCADOPTION RELATED SERVICES OF PINELLAS INC: $12,109 · Human ServicesADOPTION RELATED SERVICES OF PIN…LOTZ OF BLESSINGS INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesLOTZ OF BLESSINGS INCStop the Movement Inc: $6,000 · Human ServicesStop the Movement IncPINELLAS COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 · EducationPINELLAS COUNTY EDUCATION …ANGELS AGAINST ABUSE INC: $33,100 · Crime & LegalANGELS AGAINST ABUSE …PTA FLORIDA CONGRESS: $22,858 · OtherPTA FLORIDA CONGRES…INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY INC: $7,000 · OtherINTERFAITH FOOD PAN…CHILDREN'S CANCER CENTER INC: $12,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S CA…JOHNS HOPKINS ALL CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL INC: $8,000 · HealthJOHNS HOPKINS…
Human Services$48,830Education$40,000Crime & Legal$33,100Other$29,858Health$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPINELLAS COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetANGELS AGAINST ABUSE INC: $33,100 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetREADY FOR LIFE INC: $20,721 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetADOPTION RELATED SERVICES OF PINELLAS INC: $12,109 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER CENTER INC: $12,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS ALL CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetStop the Movement Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 12% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vinik Family Foundati…Duke Energy FoundationLightning FoundationThe Richard M Schulze…Raymond James Charita…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Vinik Family FoundationFL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vinik Family Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Lightning Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Minnreg Veterans Association Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Minnreg Veterans Association Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Minnreg Veterans Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home