Skip to content

Minnesota · Public charity

Minnesota Zoo Foundation

The MINNESOTA ZOO FOUNDATION raises contributed income and supports conservation and animal care programs on behalf of the minnesota zoo. The mission of the minnesota zoo is to connect people, animals, and the natural world to save wildlife.

$6.4M
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
4
Itemized grants FY2025
5
Organizations funded FY2024
0%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$6.1M
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$219,594
Largest grant, FY2025
$5,883,089
Organizations funded a year
3 to 7
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
4
Total assets, FY2025
$19M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 0% of the organizations Minnesota Zoo Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving4$6.1M0%
FY20245$5.5M0%
FY20235$6.2M0%
FY20223$8.3M0%
FY20213$3.4M0%
FY20207$4.2M57%
FY20194$1.4M50%
FY20184$2.2M50%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$39MEnvironment$12k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
NY
OH
MD
NC
SC
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Minnesota Zoo$37,507,0559n/a
Wildlife Conservation Society$1,621,37790%
Woodland Park Zoological Society$53,43350%
Global Conservation Network$45,00042%
Zoo Conservation Outreach Group Inc$35,00044%
World Parrot Trust USA Inc$17,00022%
Advanced Telemetry Systems Inc$6,9301n/a
Dallas Zoological Society$6,50010%
Rewild$5,00010%
Secore International Inc$5,00011%
Show all 11 grantees
All grantees of Minnesota Zoo Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Minnesota Zoo$37,507,0559n/a
Wildlife Conservation Society$1,621,37790%
Woodland Park Zoological Society$53,43350%
Global Conservation Network$45,00042%
Zoo Conservation Outreach Group Inc$35,00044%
World Parrot Trust USA Inc$17,00022%
Advanced Telemetry Systems Inc$6,9301n/a
Dallas Zoological Society$6,50010%
Rewild$5,00010%
Secore International Inc$5,00011%
The North Carolina Aquarium Society$5,00010%

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Minnesota Zoo Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWildlife Conservation Society: $1,621,377 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetWoodland Park Zoological Society: $53,433 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGlobal Conservation Network: $45,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetZoo Conservation Outreach Group Inc: $35,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetWorld Parrot Trust USA Inc: $17,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetDallas Zoological Society: $6,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRewild: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSecore International Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetThe North Carolina Aquarium Society: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 9.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Association of Zoological Parks and Aquariums IncMD13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Association of Zoological Parks and Aquariums Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Minnesota Zoo Foundation with peer funders

About Minnesota Zoo Foundation

How much does Minnesota Zoo Foundation give?
Minnesota Zoo Foundation reported 4 itemized grants totaling $6,136,183, out of $6,417,847 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 3 and 7 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Minnesota Zoo Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Animals (100%), Environment (0%).
Who are Minnesota Zoo Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Minnesota Zoo ($38M), Wildlife Conservation Society ($1.6M), Woodland Park Zoological Society ($53k).
Does Minnesota Zoo Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Minnesota Zoo Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include American Association of Zoological Parks and Aquariums Inc, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Minnesota Zoo Foundation based?
Minnesota Zoo Foundation is based in MN.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Minnesota Zoo’s filings →

More from the funding graph