Skip to content

· Public charity

Minnesota Chamber Foundation

The organization's mission is to bring stakeholders together to promote prosperity and long-term growth of minnesota's economy.

$266k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$52k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Environment$1.0MCommunity Improvement$63kEducation$24kPublic Safety & Disaster$19kFood & Nutrition$17kHealth$14kReligion$13kYouth Development$12kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $151,921, the rows itemized in this filing. The $266,156 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $114,235 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $68k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $32k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $52k
$8,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$880k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HIGHLAND COLLISION CENTER$51,913
HD COIN LAUNDRY$11,025
GASSEN COMPANY$10,927
BECKER CO FOOD PANTRY$10,000
FANETA DEVELOPMENT LLC$9,384
UNI-SYSTEMS LLC$8,003
MILLERBERND MANUFACTURING$8,000
EDGE ASSOCIATES$8,000
SAGAL MANAGEMENT$8,000
SPRINGFIELD AREA FOOD SHELF$7,093
HMONG VILLAGE INC$7,000
ARTISTIC FINISHES$6,759
SOURCE MN$5,817
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%YMCA OF THE NORTH: $10k → 11%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES: $9k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $19k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

18%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$213k · 8 repeat orgs$973k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
61

Total granted

$213k
$828k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+24%

Still filing today

13%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 5% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $145k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationFood & NutritionArts & CultureHealthReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PL
    PREMIER LIGHTING
    2× · 2021–2022 · $60k
  • LU
    LIGHTEN UP LLC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $44k
  • AI
    ARIEL INC
    2× · 2019–2021 · $32k

Funded once

  • OA
    O'LEARY AUTO BODY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • EC
    ELITE CLEANERS
    one grant, 2023 · $43k
  • MP
    MINNEAPOLIS PROPCO LLC
    one grant, 2023 · $34k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

—
2
Lake Street Council

Lake Street Council engages, serves, and advocates for the Lake Street business community in Minneapolis to ensure the vitality and prosperity of the commercial corridor. The Lake Street Council fosters economic vitality and amplifies Lake…

Community Improvement
3
Minneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce

Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.

—
4
Greater North Dakota Chamber of Commerce

The greater north dakota chamber of commerce works on behalf of our members to advocate for a positive business climate.

—
5
Lewiston Auburn Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce

The chamber is an independent, member-supported organization, which exists to promote a positive business environment that contributes to the community amd economic vitality of the androscoggin county region.through networking events,…

—
6
Williston Area Chamber of Commerce

The williston area of commerce is dedicated to advancing the exceptional economic growth of the greater williston area, fostering a community where people want to live and thrive, not just work.our vision is to advance the economic,…

—
7
Watertown Development Company

Economic development in the watertown, south dakota area.

—
8
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
9
Mill City Farmers Market Inc

Mission: to inspire and nurture a healthy community by building a local, sustainable, and organic food economy in a vibrant experiential marketplace.vision: to be a nationally recognized marketplace model that connects, educates, and…

—
10
Minnesota Chamber Foundation

The organization's mission is to bring stakeholders together to promote prosperity and long-term growth of minnesota's economy.

Public Benefit
11
Park Rapids Lakes Area Chamber

The mission of the chamber is to serve, connect and promote our members.

—
12
Alex Lakes Area Chamber of Commerce

Promote commerce & industry in alexandria, mn.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lutheran Social Service of Minnesota; the most unlike its peers is Abu-Hurira Islamic Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PREMIER LIGHTING: $60,264 · OtherPREMIER LIGHTINGHIGHLAND COLLISION CENTER: $51,913 · OtherO'LEARY AUTO BODY INC: $50,000 · OtherLIGHTEN UP LLC: $44,117 · OtherELITE CLEANERS: $43,000 · Other+66 more: $779,045 · Other+66 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $19,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTH: $10,000 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA: $9,410 · Human ServicesCITY OF LAKES WALDORF SCHOOL: $24,285 · EducationLITTLE EARTH NEIGHBORHOOD EARLY LEARNING CENTER CORPORATION: $11,613 · EducationFOCI MN CENTER FOR GLASS ARTS: $28,215 · Arts & CultureRS EDEN: $24,521 · Crime & LegalBECKER COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionSPRINGFIELD AREA FOOD SHELF: $7,093 · Food & NutritionALLINA HEALTH SYSTEM: $13,540 · Health
Other$1,028,339Human Services$38,410Education$35,898Arts & Culture$28,215Crime & Legal$24,521Food & Nutrition$17,093Health$13,540

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOCI MN CENTER FOR GLASS ARTS: $28,215 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetRS EDEN: $24,521 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCITY OF LAKES WALDORF SCHOOL: $24,285 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $19,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTWINWEST CHAMBER FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetALLINA HEALTH SYSTEM: $13,540 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE EARTH NEIGHBORHOOD EARLY LEARNING CENTER CORPORATION: $11,613 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetWHITE BEAR AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $11,070 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetWinona Area Chamber of Commerce: $10,901 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetBECKER COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTH: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA: $9,410 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRAINERD LAKES AREA CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE: $7,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGREATER MANKATO GROWTH INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSPRINGFIELD AREA FOOD SHELF: $7,093 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetPILLSBURY UNITED COMMUNITIES: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TWIN CITIES: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOURCE MN INC: $5,817 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW ULM CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $5,750 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOCI MN CENTER FOR GLASS ARTS ↗
  • Who funds RS EDEN ↗
  • Who funds CITY OF LAKES WALDORF SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds TWINWEST CHAMBER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALLINA HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds Abu-Hurira Islamic Center ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE EARTH NEIGHBORHOOD EARLY LEARNING CENTER CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds WHITE BEAR AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds Winona Area Chamber of Commerce ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Saint Paul & Minnesota FoundationMN9.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Minnesota Chamber Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Minnesota Chamber Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 81 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Minnesota Chamber’s filings →

    More from the funding graph