Skip to content

· Private foundation

Millwood Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$236k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$221kHealth$183kReligion$141kHousing & Shelter$140kEducation$99kPhilanthropy$86kFood & Nutrition$77kCommunity Improvement$75kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$683k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TOGETHER MINISTRY CENTER$36,000
PORTERLEATH$35,000
COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF S AZ$25,000
NEW AVENUES YOUTH$25,000
ROSE HAVEN$25,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF TN & NORTH MS$25,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
SMART - START MAKING A READER TODAY$10,000
CHRISTMAS FAMILY ADOPTION FOUNDATION$10,000
SWEET CHEEKS DIAPER MINSTRY$10,000
GIRLS ON THE RUN$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 14%CHRISTMAS FAMILY ADOPTION FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%CHRISTMAS FAMILY ADOPTION FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%LATINO MEMPHIS: $10k → 17%HOSPITALITY HUB: $15k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$716k · 10 repeat orgs$436k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
13

Total granted

$716k
$346k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+13%

Still filing today

50%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $90k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterEducationInternationalCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    TOGETHER MINISTRY CENTER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $141k
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF TN & NORTH MS
    5× · 2021–2025 · $125k
  • JF
    JEWISH FEDERATION OF S AZ
    4× · 2021–2024 · $86k

Funded once

  • DD
    DOROTHY DAY HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +2%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $46k
  • MA
    MEMPHIS ACADEMY OF SCIENCE AND ENGINEERIgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $40k · revenue +70%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mississippi Food Network Inc

To relieve poverty-related hunger by distributing donated and purchased food and grocery products through a network of member churches and nonprofit organizations; to provide nutrition education to the needy; and to emphasize advocacy and…

Food & Nutrition
2
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
3
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
4
One Family Memphis
Human Services
5
Memphis Tomorrow

Memphis tomorrow is an association of ceos of memphis' largest businesses working to promote opportunity and quality of life for all memphians through collective action and public-private partnerships.

Community Improvement
6
Community Alliance for the Homeless

Community alliance for the homeless unites partners and coordinates a comprehensive response system to end homelessness in memphis and shelby county.

Human Services
7
Heart of Alabama Food Bank Inc

The food bank operates as a clearing house for the collecting, sorting, storing and distribution of edible food to qualified agencies; who in turn pass the food along to alabama's "food insecure" citizens.

Food & Nutrition
8
Montgomery County Food Bank Inc

The mission of montogomery county food bank is "uniting the community" to fight hunger. the food bank is a nonprofit hunger relief organization that receives nutritious food and distributes to hungry children, seniors, veterans and…

—
9
Children's Foundation of Memphis
Health
10
Montana Food Bank Network Inc

Our mission: to end hunger in montana through food acquisition and distribution, education, and advocacy. we are the only statewide hunger organization, providing emergency food and increasing food access among needy children, seniors and…

Food & Nutrition
11
Memphis Union Misson

Memphis union mission exists to glorify god and make disciples of jesus christ by ministering to the physical, spiritual, and emotional needs of men and women who are homeless or destitute.

Housing & Shelter
12
Harvesters - the Community Food Network

Harvesters mobilizes the power of our community to create equitable access to nutritious food and address the root causes and impact of hunger.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mid-South Food Bank; the most unlike its peers is Collage Dance Collective. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
7/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TOGETHER MINISTRY CENTER: $141,000 · OtherTOGETHER MINISTRY CENTERPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF TN & NORTH MS: $125,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF TN & NORTH MSJEWISH FEDERATION OF S AZ: $86,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF S AZPORTER-LEATH: $80,000 · OtherPORTER-LEATHNEW AVENUES YOUTH: $50,000 · OtherNEW AVENUES YOUTHIndividual grant recipient: $46,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $38,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF S AZ: $30,000 · OtherINTERFAITH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF TUCSON: $25,000 · Other+6 more: $65,000 · Other+6 moreADVANCE MEMPHIS: $49,000 · EducationMEMPHIS ACADEMY OF SCIENCE AND ENGINEERI: $40,000 · EducationMID-SOUTH FOOD BANK: $52,000 · Food & NutritionCommunity Food Bank Inc: $25,000 · Food & NutritionMIFA CORPORATION: $75,000 · Community ImprovementDOROTHY DAY HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterROSE HAVEN CIC: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $25,000 · Human ServicesCHRISTMAS FAMILY ADOPTION FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE HOSPITALITY HUB OF MEMPHIS: $15,000 · Human ServicesLATINO MEMPHIS INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $25,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $25,000 · InternationalCOLLAGE DANCE COLLECTIVE: $30,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$686,000Education$89,000Food & Nutrition$77,000Community Improvement$75,000Housing & Shelter$75,000Human Services$70,000International$50,000Arts & Culture$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPORTER-LEATH: $80,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMID-SOUTH FOOD BANK: $52,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDOROTHY DAY HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY: $50,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetADVANCE MEMPHIS: $49,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetMEMPHIS ACADEMY OF SCIENCE AND ENGINEERI: $40,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCOLLAGE DANCE COLLECTIVE: $30,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTMAS FAMILY ADOPTION FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 59% of budgetTHE HOSPITALITY HUB OF MEMPHIS: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLATINO MEMPHIS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PORTER-LEATH ↗
  • Who funds MIFA CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MID-SOUTH FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds DOROTHY DAY HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY ↗
  • Who funds ADVANCE MEMPHIS ↗
  • Who funds MEMPHIS ACADEMY OF SCIENCE AND ENGINEERI ↗
  • Who funds COLLAGE DANCE COLLECTIVE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds Community Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds ROSE HAVEN CIC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTMAS FAMILY ADOPTION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE HOSPITALITY HUB OF MEMPHIS ↗
  • Who funds LATINO MEMPHIS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Thomas W Briggs Foundation IncTN17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Thomas W Briggs Foundation Inc · The Kemmons Wilson Family Foundation · Community Foundation of Greater Memphis Inc · Jr Hyde III Family Foundation · The Kresge Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Millwood Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Millwood Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Millwood Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Millwood Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Millwood’s filings →

    More from the funding graph