Skip to content
Millennium Housing Corporation at a glance

· Public charity

Millennium Housing Corporation

The organization provides affordable housing to the low and moderate income individuals, reducing the burdens of local government, combating community blight and promoting social welfare.

$414k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$296k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$1.3MHealth$180kYouth Development$70kEducation$62kHuman Services$17kArts & Culture$8kRecreation & Sports$8k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $382,696, the rows itemized in this filing. The $413,946 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $31,250 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $87k
  • $250k+1 grant · $296k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$194M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPARC INC$296,196
PEDIATRIC CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION$25,000
CITY OF HOPE$25,000
CATHOLIC BIG BROTHERS$20,000
MISSION VIEJO CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$16,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 51% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%COASTSIDE HOPE: $8k → 7%SHOES THAT FIT: $9k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 6 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
9

Total granted

$1.5M
$77k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+4%

Still filing today

83%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SI
    SPARC INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +56% · 64% of their budget
  • PC
    PEDIATRIC CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $80k · revenue +36%
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $65k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • MV
    MISSION VIEJO CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -33%
  • MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +4%
  • ST
    SHOES THAT FIT
    one grant, 2024 · $9k · revenue -30%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
City of Hope National Medical Center

City of Hope National Medical Center's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
2
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
3
California Childrens Hospital Association

Our mission is to advance the well-being of children, promote access to high quality pediatric health care, and ensure the long-term viability of childrens hospitals.

—
4
Cancer Research and Biostatistics

To help conquer cancer and other diseases through the application of biostatistical principles and innovative data management methods.

Health
5
The Children's Cancer Cause Inc

The mission of children's cancer cause is to champion policies and programs that improve the lives of children with cancer and survivors.

Health
6
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
7
Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.

Health
8
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
9
Cog Research Foundation Llc

Cog research foundation, llc is a california 501(c)(3) entity founded in 2024 and designed to become the federal grantee organization for the children's oncology group (cog). the cog, a member of the national cancer institute (nci)…

Health
10
Children's Miracle Network

Children's miracle network (dba "children's miracle network hospitals") works to save kids' lives by bringing people together to raise money for children's healthcare in local communities.

Unclassified
11
Beat Childhood Cancer Foundation Inc

Beat childhood cancer drives childhood cancer research and raises awareness, making a difference in kids' survival today. our vision is to change the story for the next family by finding viable treatments and ultimately, cures for…

Health
12
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SPARC INC: $1,201,398 · Housing & ShelterSPARC INCPEDIATRIC CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $80,000 · OtherPEDIATRIC CANCE…CATHOLIC BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC: $70,000 · OtherCATHOLIC BIG BR…MISSION VIEJO CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $36,500 · OtherMISSION VIEJO C…MISSION VIEJO CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $10,000 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $10,000 · OtherEMBRACE FOUNDATION: $8,250 · OtherDiabetes Camping & Education Services: $8,250 · OtherKURE IT INC: $40,000 · HealthCITY OF HOPE: $25,000 · HealthAmerican Diabetes Association: $8,250 · HealthSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $65,000 · EducationSHOES THAT FIT: $8,500 · Human ServicesCOASTSIDE HOPE: $8,250 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF SONOMA COUNTY: $8,250 · Arts & CultureSLAMMERS FUTBOL CLUB: $7,500 · Recreation & Sports
Housing & Shelter$1,201,398Other$223,000Health$73,250Education$65,000Human Services$16,750Arts & Culture$8,250Recreation & Sports$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSPARC INC: $1,201,398 over 6y, 64% of budgetPEDIATRIC CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetCATHOLIC BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC: $70,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $65,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKURE IT INC: $40,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetCITY OF HOPE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION VIEJO CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHOES THAT FIT: $8,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $8,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDiabetes Camping & Education Services: $8,250 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF SONOMA COUNTY: $8,250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOASTSIDE HOPE: $8,250 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSLAMMERS FUTBOL CLUB: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA7.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Millennium Housing Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Millennium Housing Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Millennium Housing Corporation?

    Find your warmest path to Millennium Housing Corporation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Millennium Housing’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home