Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Public charity

Millennium Evergreen Charitable Fund

To educate the public on the importance of education, health, and welfare of the current and upcoming generations.

$121k
Granted FY2023
7
Grants FY2023
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2023.

Philanthropy$3.2MEducation$1.8MHealth$592kCommunity Improvement$384kArts & Culture$320kReligion$268kInternational$250kPublic Benefit$233kOther$0
02FY2023 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 7 grants below total $110,600 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $120,600 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $10,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $103k
$12,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LITERACY COUNCIL OF CARROLL COUNTY$25,000
CARROLL CHILD CARE AND LEARNING CENTER$25,000
KEHILLAT MAARAV$20,000
FRIENDS OF FACES$12,500
MANHATTAN HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION$10,300
SCHOOLING FOR LIFE$10,300
MERCATUS CENTER INC$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $145k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 3% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CARROLL CHILD CARE AND LEARNING CENTER: $25k → 6%CARROLL CHILD CARE AND LEARNING CENTER: $25k → 6%CARROLL CHILD CARE AND LEARNING CENTER: $20k → 6%CARROLL CHILD CARE AND LEARNING CENTER: $20k → 6%CARROLL CHILD CARE AND LEARNING CENTER: $10k → 6%ASIAN AMERICAN LEAD: $5k → 14%YMCA FAIRFAX COUNTY: $20k → 6%YMCA FAIRFAX COUNTY: $20k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
CA
VA
MD
KS
DC
HI
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.1M · 25 repeat orgs$433k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2023, 21 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
13

Total granted

$3.1M
$401k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+50%

Still filing today

76%
77%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
HealthEducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureHuman ServicesInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SCHOOLING FOR LIFE
    4× · 2020–2023 · $728k · revenue +938% · 100% of their budget
  • TC
    THE CHEHALIS FOUNDATION
    4× · 2019–2022 · $384k · revenue +49%
  • AC
    AMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES
    2× · 2020–2021 · $300k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • JS
    JEFFERSON SCHOLARS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +94%
  • KC
    KIDS CONNECT CHARITABLE FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $73k · revenue -36%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +72%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
4
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
5
Society for Neuroscience

Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…

Health
6
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
7
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
8
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
9
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
10
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
11
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
12
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Abramson Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsElementary Literacy TutoringSchool District FoundationsPolicy Research and AdvocacyYmca Youth DevelopmentYouth Sports ProgramsHealth Access Advocacy and …Cancer Support ServicesCommunity College Foundatio…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%0%<5yr14%5%5–10yr18%15%10–20yr14%23%20–35yr15%26%35–55yr15%31%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr18%60%10–20yr14%17%20–35yr15%8%35–55yr15%13%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/44
the rest of the field
13%
6,446/50,424

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/36
Grantees still filing
31/36
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE STERLING DONOR ADVISED FUND — $3,180,300 · PhilanthropyTHE STERLING DONOR ADVISED FUND+4 more — $228,350 · Philanthropy+4 moreSCHOOLING FOR LIFE — $728,350 · EducationSCHOOLING FOR LIFETHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $400,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES O…AMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES — $300,000 · EducationAMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEE…+4 more — $72,500 · EducationJUNIOR STATE OF AMERICA — $225,000 · OtherJUNIOR STATE O…KEHILLAT MA ARAV-THE WESTSIDE CONGREGATION — $137,500 · OtherKEHILLAT MA AR…CHEHALIS SCHOOL DISTRICT — $135,325 · OtherCHEHALIS SCHOO…TEMPLE KNESSET ISRAEL — $60,000 · OtherTEMPLE KNESSET…WING LUKE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $50,000 · OtherWING LUKE MEMO…REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN — $50,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE…CARROLL CHILD CARE CENTERS INC — $100,000 · OtherCARROLL CHILD …YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON — $40,000 · Other+8 more — $127,500 · Other+8 moreFRIENDS OF FACES — $75,000 · HealthFOUNDATION TO ERADICATE DUCHENNE INC — $75,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S NATIONAL — $75,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $50,000 · HealthBRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION — $50,000 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $39,150 · HealthPROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES FOUNDATION SAN FERNANDO & SANTA CLARITA VALLEYS SA — $30,000 · HealthEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $30,000 · HealthNYU LANGONE HOSPITALS — $25,000 · Health+2 more — $20,000 · HealthTHE CHEHALIS FOUNDATION — $383,925 · Community ImprovementSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $200,000 · Arts & CultureCHINESE AMERICAN MUSEUM FOUNDATION — $50,000 · Arts & CultureBISHOP MUSEUM — $20,000 · Arts & CultureBest Buddies International Inc — $250,000 · International
Philanthropy$3,408,650Education$1,500,850Other$925,325Health$469,150Community Improvement$383,925Arts & Culture$270,000International$250,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE STERLING DONOR ADVISED FUND — $3,180,300 over 3y, 26% of budgetSCHOOLING FOR LIFE — $728,350 over 4y, 100% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $400,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHEHALIS FOUNDATION — $383,925 over 4y, 13% of budgetAMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES — $300,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBest Buddies International Inc — $250,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetJUNIOR STATE OF AMERICA — $225,000 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $200,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCARROLL CHILD CARE CENTERS INC — $100,000 over 5y, 5.8% of budgetJEFFERSON SCHOLARS FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF FACES — $75,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetFOUNDATION TO ERADICATE DUCHENNE INC — $75,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S NATIONAL — $75,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS CONNECT CHARITABLE FUND — $73,050 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetCHINESE AMERICAN MUSEUM FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWING LUKE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetBRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER MANHATTAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $40,300 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON — $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $39,150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES FOUNDATION SAN FERNANDO & SANTA CLARITA VALLEYS SA — $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLITERACY COUNCIL OF CARROLL COUNTY INC — $25,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetNYU LANGONE HOSPITALS — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN NUTRITION ASSOCIATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetBISHOP MUSEUM — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWHEATON COLLEGE — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MARYLAND INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBOSTON VA RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEPILEPSY STUDY CONSORTIUM INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMercatus Center Inc — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE REASON FOUNDATION — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAsian American LEAD — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Youth Initiative FundThe Sterling Donor Ad…Kids Connect Charitab…Century Vision Benefi…May Liang and James L…American Gift FundGs Donor Advised Phil…Renaissance Charitabl…Morgan Stanley Global…The Blackbaud Giving …The Bank of America C…National Philanthropi…
Youth Initiative FundMD37× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Youth Initiative Fund · The Sterling Donor Advised Fund · Kids Connect Charitable Fund · Century Vision Benefit Fund · May Liang and James Lintott Foundation · American Gift Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Millennium Evergreen Charitable Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Boston Va Research Institute Inc — 64% of income from government
  • Epilepsy Foundation of America — 22% of income from government
  • Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Amherst College Trustees — 0% of income from government
  • Wheaton College — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Millennium Evergreen Charitable Fund?

Find your warmest path to Millennium Evergreen Charitable Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $13k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines