Skip to content

· Private foundation

Milford & Lee Bohm Charitable Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6.5M
Granted FY2022
17
Grants FY2022
5
States reached
$2.1M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Philanthropy$2.6MReligion$1.7MHuman Services$1.4MArts & Culture$1.0MHealth$665kCivil Rights$648kScience & Tech$177kEnvironment$92kOther$0
02FY2022 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k3 grants · $500
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $42k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $554k
  • $250k+7 grants · $5.9M
$102,492
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION OF ST LOUIS$2,084,651
CONGREGATION SHAARE EMETH$1,402,740
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF ST LOUIS$852,539
BARNES JEWISH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$498,285
UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM$498,080
JEWISH COUNCIL FOR PUBLIC AFFAIRS$300,000
AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE$257,125
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$151,515
AMERICAN TECHNION SOCIETY$102,492
REPERTORY THEATRE OF ST LOUIS$100,122
UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS$100,000
COVENANT PLACE FOUNDATION$100,000
GREAT RIVERS ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER$22,133
CENTER OF CREATIVE ARTS$20,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $1k → 21%AGING AHEAD FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $1k → 21%AGING AHEAD FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%AGING AHEAD FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF ST LOUIS: $853k → 11%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $152k → 11%COVENANT PLACE FOUNDATION: $100k → 11%COVENANT PLACE FOUNDATION: $56k → 11%COVENANT PLACE FOUNDATION: $53k → 11%COVENANT PLACE FOUNDATION: $51k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN SERVICES: $20k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $20k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $15k → 11%COVENANT PLACE FOUNDATION: $8k → 11%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $3k → 11%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $2k → 11%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $2k → 11%COVENANT PLACE FOUNDATION: $52k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
IA
CA
MO
VA
AR
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 25% of Milford & Lee Bohm Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 87% of the giving stays in MO; by stated purpose, 83%.

Milford & Lee Bohm Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.7% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.9M · 80 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

80 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2022, 65 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

80
10

Total granted

$5.9M
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+26%

Still filing today

66%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Arts & CultureEnvironmentHealthHuman ServicesInternationalCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF ST LOUIS
    4× · 2017–2022 · $908k · revenue +31%
  • TU
    The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
    3× · 2017–2022 · $507k · revenue +25%
  • JC
    JEWISH COUNCIL FOR PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $357k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • JF
    JEWISH FOOD PANTRY
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • AM
    A MILLION STARS INC DBA COLLEGE BOUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +26%
  • HI
    HEIFER INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
2
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
3
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
4
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
5
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
6
National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated

The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.

Community Improvement
7
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
8
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
9
Jewelers of America Inc

Jewelers of america, the most trusted and influential voice of the jewelry industry, empowers and unites its members through expert guidance and advocacy, driving excellence, integrity, and success in an ever-changing marketplace.

—
10
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
11
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
12
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of St Louis; the most unlike its peers is Shaving Israel. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

64 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 64 of the 95 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
62/64
Grantees still filing
48/64
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Jewish Federation of St Louis: $2,409,651 · PhilanthropyJewish Federation of St LouisUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $167,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC+2 more: $9,000 · PhilanthropyCONGREGATION SHAARE EMETH: $1,716,740 · OtherCONGREGATION SHAARE EMETHJEWISH COUNCIL FOR PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC: $356,500 · OtherJEWISH COUNCIL FOR PUBLIC AFFAIRS …HOLOCAUST MUSEUM OF ST LOUIS: $147,500 · OtherHOLOCAUST MUSEUM OF ST LOUIS+59 more: $383,233 · Other+59 moreJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF ST LOUIS: $907,539 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERV…COVENANT PLACE FOUNDATION: $320,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT PLACE FOU…JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $154,015 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY C…+3 more: $15,500 · Human ServicesThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $506,880 · Arts & CultureThe United…THE REPERTORY THEATRE OF ST LOUIS: $130,122 · Arts & CultureTHE REPERT…CENTER OF CREATIVE ARTS: $130,000 · Arts & CultureCENTER OF …+5 more: $43,750 · Arts & Culture+5 moreTHE FOUNDATION FOR BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL: $573,285 · HealthST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $30,000 · HealthGATEWAY TO HOPE: $25,000 · Health+4 more: $5,350 · HealthAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $282,125 · Civil Rights+1 more: $2,500 · Civil RightsAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $127,492 · InternationalAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · International+4 more: $13,000 · International
Philanthropy$2,585,651Other$2,603,973Human Services$1,397,054Arts & Culture$810,752Health$633,635Civil Rights$284,625International$165,492

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJewish Federation of St Louis: $2,409,651 over 6y, 13% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF ST LOUIS: $907,539 over 4y, 13% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL: $573,285 over 6y, 8.5% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $506,880 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH COUNCIL FOR PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC: $356,500 over 6y, 10% of budgetCOVENANT PLACE FOUNDATION: $320,000 over 6y, 21% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $282,125 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $167,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $154,015 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE REPERTORY THEATRE OF ST LOUIS: $130,122 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetCENTER OF CREATIVE ARTS: $130,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $127,492 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGreat Rivers Environmental Law Center: $28,133 over 6y, 4.4% of budgetGATEWAY TO HOPE: $25,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetOpera Theatre of Saint Louis: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL: $19,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetSAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMIRIAM FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $8,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF ST LOUIS: $7,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN ST LOUIS SECTION: $6,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetPEDAL THE CAUSE: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWHATCOM COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICA-ISRAEL CULTURAL FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetST LOUIS EFFORT FOR AIDS INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOURI GIRLS TOWN FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFeeding America: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHadassah The Women's Zionist Org of America Inc: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI St Louis: $2,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetA MILLION STARS INC DBA COLLEGE BOUND: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Whatcom County: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL AT WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS: $2,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSTAND: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAGING AHEAD FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetINTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION: $1,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNION AVENUE OPERA THEATRE: $1,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetST LOUIS JEWISH LIGHT: $1,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Jewish Federation of St Louis ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COUNCIL FOR PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT PLACE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE REPERTORY THEATRE OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds CENTER OF CREATIVE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Great Rivers Environmental Law Center ↗
  • Who funds GATEWAY TO HOPE ↗
  • Who funds Opera Theatre of Saint Louis ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY RELATIONS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds SAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
  • Who funds MIRIAM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds THE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN ST LOUIS SECTION ↗
  • Who funds PEDAL THE CAUSE ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO31.7× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Moneta Group Charitable Foundation · Sam and Marilyn Fox Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation · Jewish Federation of St Louis · Trio Foundation of St Louis · Edward Jones Foundation · Stanley & Lucy Lopata Foundation · Centene Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Milford & Lee Bohm Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Milford & Lee Bohm Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Milford & Lee Bohm Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Milford & Lee Bohm Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 95 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Milford & Lee Bohm’s filings →

More from the funding graph