Skip to content
Mildred Yount Manion Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Mildred Yount Manion Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$605k
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$1.2MHealth$1.1MAnimals$917kYouth Development$253kArts & Culture$189kHousing & Shelter$153kRecreation & Sports$57kFood & Nutrition$56kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $325k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $250k
$15,155
Median grant
3
States reached
$6.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEFFERSON COUNTY REVISION$100,000
BAPTISTS HOSPITALS OF SETX$100,000
FAMILY SERVICES OF SE TEXAS$50,000
FAMILY SERVICES OF SE TEXAS$30,000
CHRISTUS HEALTH FOUNDATION SETX$25,000
CLIFFORD ANTONE FOUNDATION$20,000
FAMILY SERVICE CENTER OF GALVESTON$20,000
SOUTHEAST TEXAS FOOD BANK$20,000
SPAY NEUTER INJECT PROTECT$20,000
STAFFORD ANIMAL SHELTER$20,000
SOME OTHER PLACE$20,000
BEAUMONT PETS ALIVE$20,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SE TX$20,000
JULIE ROGERS GIFT OF LIFE PROGRAM$18,735
TEXAS ENERGY MUSEUM INC$15,155
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $771k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PETALUMA PEOPLE SERVICES CENTER: $5k → 9%SOUTHEAST TEXAS FOOD BANK: $20k → 19%PETALUMA PEOPLE SERVICES CENTER: $2k → 9%PETALUMA PEOPLE SERVICES CENTER: $2k → 9%NUTRITION & SERVICES FOR SENIORS: $10k → 19%NUTRITION & SERVICES FOR SENIORS: $10k → 19%NUTRITUON AND SERVICES FOR SENIORS: $10k → 19%FAMILY SERVICES OF SE TEXAS: $180k → 19%FAMILY SERVICES OF SE TEXAS: $70k → 19%FAMILY SERVICES OF SE TEXAS: $51k → 19%FAMILY SERVICES OF SE TEXAS: $50k → 19%FAMILY SERVICES OF SE TEXAS: $45k → 19%FAMILY SERVICES OF SE TEXAS: $33k → 19%FAMILY SERVICES OF SE TEXAS: $30k → 19%FAMILY SERVICES OF SE TEXAS: $30k → 19%FAMILY SERVICES OF SE TEXAS: $25k → 19%FAMILY SERVICES OF SE TEXAS: $25k → 19%FAMILY SERVICES OF SE TEXAS: $20k → 19%GIRLS' HAVEN INC: $20k → 19%FAMILY SERVICES OF SE TEXAS: $15k → 19%FAMILY SERVICES OF SE TEXAS: $15k → 19%GIRLS' HAVEN INC: $15k → 19%SOME OTHER PLACE: $15k → 19%SOME OTHER PLACE: $15k → 19%SOME OTHER PLACE: $15k → 19%GIRLS' HAVEN INC: $15k → 19%SOME OTHER PLACE: $10k → 19%GIRLS' HAVEN INC: $10k → 19%GIRLS' HAVEN INC: $8k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.7M · 30 repeat orgs$381k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
13

Total granted

$3.7M
$205k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+39%

Still filing today

57%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $176k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesHealthEducationArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FS
    FAMILY SERVICES OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $589k · revenue +202%
  • GALVESTON ISLAND HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $313k · revenue +23%
  • SA
    STAFFORD ANIMAL SHELTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $275k · revenue +106%

Funded once

  • LC
    LEGACY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +207%
  • G4
    GO 4 THE BELL CHARITY
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • MH
    MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF SETX
    one grant, 2023 · $23k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Friends of Port Aransas Inc

Provide veterinary and shelter services for displaced and wayward animals in the township and outlying area of port aransas, texas.

Animals
2
Allies Haven Animal Rescue

Saving unwanted, abandoned, abused and neglected dogs in Texas. Also to promote proper pet ownership, community educational programs and to support spaying/neutering as a means to control unwanted pets. We provide complete vetting prior to…

Animals
3
South Texas Animal Rescue Group

We own and operate a spay/neuter and wellness clinic. Our purpose is to end animal cruelty in Texas, spay/neuter, vaccinate, and end the dumping and abandonment of cats and dogs. We also have an education program to teach Texas residents…

Animals
4
Aggieland Humane Society

To provide humane shelter, care and placement for stray and unwanted animals, and to promote the human-animal bond and responsible pet ownership to enhance the quality of life for the people and animals in our community.

Animals
5
Angies Dog House

We are dedicated to rescuig animals left homeless for whatever reason, animals in public shelters where they are at high risk of euthanasia, animals given up by their owners because of difficult circumstances, and those in danger of abuse…

Animals
6
Cupids Animal Haven

Cupids Animal Haven offers a permanent home for less adoptable cats. We also strive to educate Texans about options for spay and neuter to prevent overpopulation and suffering of animals.

Animals
7
Pippys Pals Rescue

Pippys Pals Rescue is dedicated to saving the lives of dogs facing euthanasia in Houston. Our mission is to provide a second chance to these beloved companions by rescuing them from shelters, providing them with necessary medical care, and…

Animals
8
Sunnyside Street Dogs I

Community dog rescue focused on saving and rehoming street dogs in Houston.

Animals
9
Saving South Texas

To save the lives of at-risk animals in South Texas through fundraising and forming out of state transport partners.

Animals
10
The Humane Society of East Texas

Our mission is to provide a temporary haven for the animals in our care, until they find their forever families. we are committed to reduce and ultimately eliminate euthanasia as an acceptable method of population control for unwanted dogs…

Animals
11
Annas Angels Dog Rescue

Our animal adoption organization is dedicated to improving the lives of southeast texas animals, primarily dogs.

Animals
12
Helotes Humane Society

Rescue and place abandoned and unwanted pets. Provide low cost spay / neuter. Provide low-cost microchips. Provide community education.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Services of Southeast Texas Inc; the most unlike its peers is Legacy Community Health Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
16/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHRISTUS HEALTH FOUNDATION SETX: $407,277 · OtherCHRISTUS HEALTH FOUNDATION SETXBAPTISTS HOSPITALS OF SETX: $342,000 · OtherBAPTISTS HOSPITALS OF SETXFAMILY SERVICE CENTER OF GALVESTON: $195,000 · OtherFAMILY SERVICE CENTER OF GALVESTONCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SE TX: $154,856 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SE TXSAMARITAN COUNSEL CTR OF SETX: $66,792 · OtherUNIV OF KENTUCKY RESEARCH FD: $66,300 · OtherIEA - INSPIRE ENCOURAGE ACHIEVE: $89,500 · Other+20 more: $359,164 · Other+20 moreFAMILY SERVICES OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INC: $589,105 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICES OF SOUTH…Some Other Place: $162,500 · Human ServicesSome Other PlaceGIRLS' HAVEN INC: $67,500 · Human ServicesGIRLS' HAVEN INCNUTRITION AND SERVICES FOR SENIORS: $30,000 · Human Services+2 more: $29,000 · Human ServicesGALVESTON ISLAND HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $313,263 · AnimalsGALVESTON ISLAND HUMANE …STAFFORD ANIMAL SHELTER: $275,448 · AnimalsSTAFFORD ANIMAL SHELTERHumane Society Of Southeast Texas: $166,194 · AnimalsHumane Society Of Southe…PROJECT ANIMALAID: $72,500 · AnimalsPROJECT ANIMALAID+3 more: $49,400 · Animals+3 moreJulie Rogers Gift of Life Program: $241,435 · HealthLEGACY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $25,000 · HealthTEXAS MISSIONS OF MERCY: $13,656 · Health+2 more: $20,000 · HealthAnayat House Inc: $137,955 · Housing & ShelterJefferson County reVision dba reVision SETX: $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentMsgr Kelly Catholic High School Foundation Inc: $55,000 · EducationCLIFFORD ANTONE FOUNDATION: $45,000 · Education
Other$1,680,889Human Services$878,105Animals$876,805Health$300,091Housing & Shelter$137,955Youth Development$100,000Education$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAMILY SERVICES OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INC: $589,105 over 9y, 7.7% of budgetGALVESTON ISLAND HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $313,263 over 7y, 6.1% of budgetSTAFFORD ANIMAL SHELTER: $275,448 over 9y, 4.1% of budgetJulie Rogers Gift of Life Program: $241,435 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetSome Other Place: $162,500 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetAnayat House Inc: $137,955 over 9y, 20% of budgetJefferson County reVision dba reVision SETX: $100,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetIEA - INSPIRE ENCOURAGE ACHIEVE: $89,500 over 8y, 5.4% of budgetPROJECT ANIMALAID: $72,500 over 9y, 3.3% of budgetGIRLS' HAVEN INC: $67,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetMsgr Kelly Catholic High School Foundation Inc: $55,000 over 5y, 5.9% of budgetCLIFFORD ANTONE FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetTEXAS ENERGY MUSEUM INC: $32,655 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetNUTRITION AND SERVICES FOR SENIORS: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLEGACY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJens Neonatal Nursery: $20,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetBEAUMONT PETS ALIVE: $20,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetTEXAS MISSIONS OF MERCY: $13,656 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetPORT ARTHUR HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $10,100 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetPAWS FOR PATRICK: $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetETOSHA RESCUE & ADOPTION CENTER: $9,400 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetPETALUMA PEOPLE SERVICES CENTER: $9,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBEAUMONT FARMERS MARKET: $5,000 over 1y, 10% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICES OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds GALVESTON ISLAND HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds STAFFORD ANIMAL SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds Julie Rogers Gift of Life Program ↗
  • Who funds Humane Society Of Southeast Texas ↗
  • Who funds Some Other Place ↗
  • Who funds Anayat House Inc ↗
  • Who funds Jefferson County reVision dba reVision SETX ↗
  • Who funds IEA - INSPIRE ENCOURAGE ACHIEVE ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT ANIMALAID ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS' HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Msgr Kelly Catholic High School Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CLIFFORD ANTONE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS ENERGY MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds NUTRITION AND SERVICES FOR SENIORS ↗
  • Who funds LEGACY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Jens Neonatal Nursery ↗
  • Who funds Southeast Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds BEAUMONT PETS ALIVE ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS MISSIONS OF MERCY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mechia FoundationHe and Kate Dishman C…Mamie McFaddin Ward H…Wilton and Effie Hebe…Foundation for Southe…Greater Houston Commu…Gladys Bevil Charitab…Sabine Oaks HomeHelen Bell Charitable…Young Mens Business L…B a and E W Steinhage…The Moody Foundation
Mechia FoundationTX30.3× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mechia Foundation · He and Kate Dishman Charitable Trust · Mamie McFaddin Ward Heritage Foundation · Wilton and Effie Hebert Foundation · Foundation for Southeast Texas Inc · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Gladys Bevil Charitable Trust · Sabine Oaks Home · Helen Bell Charitable Trust 1115004314 · Young Mens Business League of Beaumont · B a and E W Steinhagen Benevolent Trust · The Moody Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mildred Yount Manion Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mildred Yount Manion Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mildred Yount Manion’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home