Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mike and Michelle Berlin Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$205k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$456kPhilanthropy$259kFood & Nutrition$221kHuman Services$153kEducation$68kHealth$46kReligion$36kYouth Development$21kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $147k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$782k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOOD BANK OF THE HEARTLAND$50,000
OPEN DOOR MISSION$30,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$25,000
SIENA FRANCIS HOUSE$25,000
JESUIT ACADEMY$15,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL CHURCH$12,000
THE TREVOR PROJECT$10,000
CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE$10,000
PROJECT HARMONY$10,000
HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE$10,000
OMAHA COMMUNITY PLAYHOUSE$2,564
PGA REACH NEBRASKA$1,995
OMAHA PUBLIC LIBRARIES FOUNDATION$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $370k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $50k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $45k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $30k → 12%PGA REACH NEBRASKA: $2k → 13%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $30k → 12%PGA REACH NEBRASKA: $2k → 13%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $30k → 12%PGA REACH NEBRASKA: $875 → 13%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $30k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $10k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE: $10k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE: $5k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE: $5k → 12%CHILD SAVINGS INSTITUTE: $5k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE: $5k → 12%NEW CASSEL RETIREMENT CENTER: $100 → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $30k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $30k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $20k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $10k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $10k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $5k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
OR
IA
CA
NE
VA
TN
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 21 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
19

Total granted

$1.0M
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+14%

Still filing today

67%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionHealthCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $110k · revenue +53%
  • TREVOR PROJECT INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $45k · revenue +189%
  • CS
    CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC
    5× · 2019–2025 · $30k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • HM
    HEART MINISTRY CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -17%
  • FT
    Feed The Massgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +860%
  • CK
    COMPLETELY KIDSgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +183%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
2
Nebraska Community Foundation

The nebraska community foundation unleashes abundant local assets, inspires charitable giving, and connects ambitious people to build stronger communities and a greater nebraska.

Philanthropy
3
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
4
Share Omaha

Our mission is to help nonprofits fulfill theirs.

Philanthropy
5
Catholic Charities Foundation

Support the mission and social services programs of catholic charities of the archdiocese of omaha, inc.

Religion
6
One Omaha

One omaha empowers people where they live with education, training, and engagement to develop thriving neighborhoods.

Community Improvement
7
Feeding South Dakota

To eliminate hunger in south dakota.

Food & Nutrition
8
Nebraska Children & Families Foundation

Nebraska children's mission is to create positive change for children through community engagement. our vision is a nebraska where all children will have the resources and support to reach their full potential. our values are (1)…

Philanthropy
9
Eastern Nebraska Community Action Partnership

Encap provides high-impact programs to help people get ahead.

—
10
The Foundation of Firsthealth Inc

Provide philanthropic support to firsthealth of the carolinas, inc., a healthcare system exempt from income tax under irs section 501c(3) and 170(b)(1)(a)(iii).

—
11
Second Harvest North Central Food Bank

Engaging the community to end hunger

—
12
Heartland Community Health Network Inc

Heartland community health network exists to support and strengthen its federally qualified health center members through collaboration, information-sharing and integration of administrative, fiscal and clinical operations.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heartland Family Service; the most unlike its peers is The Benjamin H Ryan Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
15/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND: $205,000 · OtherFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLANDJESUIT ACADEMY: $60,000 · OtherJESUIT ACADEMYHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $50,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYST VINCENT DE PAUL CHURCH: $36,000 · OtherST VINCENT DE PAUL CHURCHTHE BENJAMIN H RYAN FOUNDATION: $16,000 · Other+27 more: $54,878 · Other+27 moreOPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE: $225,000 · Human ServicesOPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOO…HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $110,000 · Human ServicesHEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICECHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesCHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC+3 more: $5,860 · Human ServicesOmaha Community Foundation: $242,000 · PhilanthropyOmaha Community Found…+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropySIENA FRANCIS HOUSE: $155,000 · Housing & ShelterSIENA FRANCIS H…GESU HOUSING INC: $23,500 · Housing & ShelterGESU HOUSING IN…TREVOR PROJECT INC: $45,070 · Civil RightsFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $17,500 · Youth DevelopmentCOMPLETELY KIDS: $3,090 · Youth DevelopmentPROJECT HARMONY: $20,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$421,878Human Services$370,860Philanthropy$243,000Housing & Shelter$178,500Civil Rights$45,070Youth Development$20,590Crime & Legal$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOmaha Community Foundation: $242,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE: $225,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND: $205,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE: $155,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetHEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $110,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $45,070 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC: $30,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGESU HOUSING INC: $23,500 over 4y, 6.5% of budgetPROJECT HARMONY: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $17,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BENJAMIN H RYAN FOUNDATION: $16,000 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetOMAHA COMMUNITY PLAYHOUSE: $11,205 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHEART MINISTRY CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFeed The Mass: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetNEBRASKA PGA FOUNDATION: $4,760 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCOMPLETELY KIDS: $3,090 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOMAHA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $2,100 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFREMONT AREA UNITED WAY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEBRASKA PUBLIC MEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA'S CHARITIES: $260 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $236 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ALLIANCE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW CASSEL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Omaha Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds OPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds SIENA FRANCIS HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds GESU HOUSING INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HARMONY ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds THE BENJAMIN H RYAN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA COMMUNITY PLAYHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds HEART MINISTRY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Feed The Mass ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA PGA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMPLETELY KIDS ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FREMONT AREA UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA PUBLIC MEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA'S CHARITIES ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW CASSEL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Charles and Mary Heider Family FoundationNE26.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · The Lozier Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · Weitz Family Foundation · Clifton B & Anne S Batchelder Foundation · Mutual of Omaha Foundation · Immanuel Community Vision Foundation · The Gfh & Sah Foundation · Harley and Beth Schrager Foundation · Kenneth (Kim) & Karen Hawkins Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mike and Michelle Berlin Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mike and Michelle Berlin Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mike and Michelle Berlin Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Mike and Michelle Berlin Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mike and Michelle Berlin Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph