How much did MIDWEST HOUSING EQUITY GROUP INC grant in FY2024?

MIDWEST HOUSING EQUITY GROUP INC reported 10 grants totaling $235,059 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is MIDWEST HOUSING EQUITY GROUP INC based?

MIDWEST HOUSING EQUITY GROUP INC is based in NE.

MIDWEST HOUSING EQUITY GROUP INC

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

MIDWEST HOUSING EQUITY GROUP INC

Midwest housing equity group, inc's mission is to change lives for a better tomorrow by promoting the development and sustainability of quality affordable housing.

$235k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$30k

Largest

01What you fund

0168% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Arts & Culture$211kPhilanthropy$184kFood & Nutrition$100kCrime & Legal$45kHuman Services$43kEducation$35kHousing & Shelter$29kPublic Benefit$16kOther$312k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

directors appreciationappreciation further

2019

estesneighborhoodshealthhealthcareheart ministryministry center'sfresh start

2020

esteslearningpresentationartsitems foodeducation

2021

healthcareheart ministryministry center'sfresh startartspresentationitems food

2022

healthcarewillingheart ministryministry center'sfresh startmedicalfood distribution

2023

boy scoutsgodcharteritems foodstudentsartspresentation

2024

personnelboy scoutschartergodartsstudentseducation

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k1 grant · $6k
$10k–50k9 grants · $155k

$20,000

Median grant

States reached

$77M

Total assets

Largest grants

OMAHA PERFORMING ARTS$29,600
OKLAHOMA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INCORPORATED$20,000
HAYES CARES$20,000
SHADY SIDE ACADEMY$20,000
OMAHA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$20,000
EDUCATION FOUNDATION FOR CLINTON STUDENTS INC$15,000
MID-AMERICA COUNCIL BOY SCOUT TRUST INC$10,000
SEAL FAMILY FOUNDATION$10,000
UNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS$10,000
OFFUTT ADVISORY COUNCIL$6,224

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 92% of MIDWEST HOUSING EQUITY GROUP INC’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 73% of the giving stays in NE; read by stated purpose it is 8% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

MIDWEST HOUSING EQUITY GROUP INClessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$814k · 20 repeat orgs$160k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$814k

$124k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%

+82%

Still filing today

80%

91%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

PhilanthropyHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

OP
OMAHA PERFORMING ARTS
5× · 2020–2024 · $174k · revenue +13%
REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC
6× · 2018–2023 · $74k · revenue +23%
UW
UNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS
6× · 2019–2024 · $56k · revenue +62%

Funded once

EO
EQUALITY OF OPPORTUNITY IMPACT FOUNDATION
one grant, 2021 · $50k
UO
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +35%
Y
YOUTURNgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +112%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Mutual of Omaha Foundation

Philanthropy

One Omaha

One omaha empowers people where they live with education, training, and engagement to develop thriving neighborhoods.

Community Improvement

Omaha Conservatory of Music

The omaha conservatory of music is a non-profit school that builds a diverse musical community to enrich lives through education and performance.

Arts & Culture

Omaha Theater Company

To inspire young people and their families to discover the magic of theater.

Arts & Culture

Omaha Children's Museum

The underlying mission of the organization is to engage children's imaginations and create excitement about learning.

Arts & Culture

Jewish Federation of Omaha Foundation

To conduct and support activities for the benefit of the jewish federation of omaha.

Philanthropy

Omaha Zoo Foundation

Support the mission, research and programs benefitting omaha's henry doorly zoo and aquarium.

Animals

Nebraska Community Foundation

The nebraska community foundation unleashes abundant local assets, inspires charitable giving, and connects ambitious people to build stronger communities and a greater nebraska.

Philanthropy

Share Omaha

Our mission is to help nonprofits fulfill theirs.

Philanthropy

Omaha 100

To provide home ownership opportunities through public and private partnerships, financing, and technical assistance enabling low and moderate income borrowers to own their own home.

Housing & Shelter

Opas Foundation

The mission of OPAS Foundation is to further the objectives and purpose of Omaha Performing Arts Society.

Arts & Culture

Nebraska Methodist Hospital

Improving the quality of life through excellence in healthcare.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Midwest Housing Development Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is Joslyn Art Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 25. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 15% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 7% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/34

the rest of the field

925/14,078

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

06the grantee network

29 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

29/29

Grantees still filing

25/29

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$356,974Arts & Culture$211,060Philanthropy$183,500Food & Nutrition$99,750Crime & Legal$45,000Human Services$42,500Education$35,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Sherwood FoundationNE28.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Sherwood Foundation · The Lozier Foundation · Nebraska Community Foundation · Suzanne & Walter Scott Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · Peter Kiewit Foundation · Union Pacific Foundation · Dixon Family Foundation · Mutual of Omaha Foundation · United Way of the Midlands · Lincoln Community Foundation Inc · The Owen Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation MIDWEST HOUSING EQUITY GROUP INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: EDUCATION FOUNDATION FOR CLINTON STUDENTS INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~2 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 2 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

2 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 6.2× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 431777218 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on EDUCATION FOUNDATION FOR CLINTON STUDENTS INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 2 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 9% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Midwest Housing Equity Group Inc?

Find your warmest path to Midwest Housing Equity Group Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

MIDWEST HOUSING EQUITY GROUP INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

29 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Midwest Housing Equity Group Inc?

More from the funding graph

MIDWEST HOUSING EQUITY GROUP INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

29 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Midwest Housing Equity Group Inc?

More from the funding graph