How much did MID WILLAMETTE VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION grant in FY2023?

MID WILLAMETTE VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION reported 13 grants totaling $21,796,784 in its FY2023 IRS filing.

Where is MID WILLAMETTE VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION based?

MID WILLAMETTE VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION is based in OR.

MID WILLAMETTE VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

MID WILLAMETTE VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION

Providing vital services and resources; meeting the needs of our community

$22M

Granted FY2023

Grants

Communities

$827k

Largest

01What you fund

0163% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2023.

Housing & Shelter$1.9MReligion$1.8MHuman Services$838kCommunity Improvement$462kHealth$69kArts & Culture$61kOther$3.0M

02FY2023 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

$10k–50k3 grants · $90k
$50k–250k9 grants · $1.1M
$250k+1 grant · $827k

$60,510

Median grant

States reached

$40M

Total assets

Largest grants

POLK COUNTY FAMILY & COMMUNITY OUTREACH DEPARTMENT$826,919
SALEM INTERFAITH HOSPITALITY NETWORK (FAMILY PROMISE)$216,037
SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITY$206,571
ST FRANCIS SHELTER$176,574
SILVERTON SHELTERING SERVICES$135,822
A RAY OF HOPE TODAY$127,433
UNITED WAY OF THE MID-WILLAMETTE VALLEY$60,510
CENTER FOR HOPE AND SAFETY$60,250
SABLE HOUSE$58,175
NORTHWEST HUMAN SERVICES$55,000
SAFETY COMPASS$37,324
RECOVERY OUTREACH COMMUNITY CENTER$32,047
MICRONESIAN ISLANDER COMMUNITY$20,496

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $838k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$7.9M · 15 repeat orgs$243k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$7.9M

$206k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+98%

+540%

Still filing today

80%

40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Housing & ShelterReligionHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementHealthArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SI
SALEM INTERFAITH HOSPITALITY NETWORK (FAMILY PROMISE)
6× · 2018–2023 · $1.1M · revenue +20% · 53% of their budget
AR
A RAY OF HOPE TODAY
2× · 2022–2023 · $462k · revenue +144% · 56% of their budget
SS
SILVERTON SHELTERING SERVICES
5× · 2019–2023 · $461k · revenue +642% · 71% of their budget

Funded once

SO
SEED OF FAITH MINISTRIES
one grant, 2022 · $105k
MV
MID-WILLAMETTE VALLEY HOMELESS ALLIANCE
one grant, 2022 · $55k
SJ
ST JOSEPH'S SHELTER
one grant, 2018 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

S a F E Shelter

Provides Crisis intervention and advocacy for Victims of Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault. Provides Emergency confidential Shelter to victims of Domestic Violence.

—

Samaritan House Inc

Provide shelter and basic needs for homeless people. while fostering self-respect and human dignity, samaritan house will encourage the residents' efforts to find employment and housing.

Housing & Shelter

Samaritan House Inc

Samaritan house assists victims of violence and homeless families with community resources and emergency and permanent housing.

Housing & Shelter

Raphael House of Portland

To engage our community in non-violent living & providing a safe haven from domestic violence.

Human Services

Magnificat Houses Inc

Magnificat Houses, Inc. offers a welcoming community where those needing housing, food and mental health programs can grow in stability, productivity and independence.

Health

Welcome Home Housing Inc

Welcome Home Housing is a non-profit organization in Sacramento California that provides affordable housing and services to individuals with mental illness.

Human Services

Bethany House Abuse Shelter Inc

Bethany house abuse shelter provides a safe haven and comprehensive services for victims of domestic violence and their children.

Human Services

Family Crisis Shelter Inc

Emergency shelter for victims of domestic abuse and supportive services to all victims of abuse

Human Services

Northwest Arkansas Women's Shelter

The northwest arkansas women's shelter is committed to servicing victims of domestic violence.

Human Services

His Helping Hands Ministries

Provide safe housing and training to women who were victims of addiction,sex trafficking, abuse, homelesness or previously incarcerated.

Religion

Sitka Homeless Coalition

The sitka homeless coalition strives to provide warm, safe shelter to those in need.

Housing & Shelter

New Hope of Mcdowell

Shelter

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Hope and Safety and the most unlike its peers is Silverton Sheltering Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

15/15

Grantees still filing

13/15

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$3,035,506Housing & Shelter$1,896,480Religion$1,755,911Human Services$837,692Community Improvement$461,940Health$69,280Arts & Culture$61,486

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Maps Community FoundationOR26.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Maps Community Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · Marion-Polk Food Share Inc · The Salem Foundation · Evergreen Charitable Trust · Willamette Health Council · Salem Health · United Way of the Mid-Willamette Valley · Women's Foundation of Oregon · Meyer Memorial Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation MID WILLAMETTE VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

6get no government money at all

1rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: SILVERTON SHELTERING SERVICES.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~3 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 5 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 7.4× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 825182958 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on SILVERTON SHELTERING SERVICES, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 3 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 71% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Mid Willamette Valley Community Action?

Find your warmest path to Mid Willamette Valley Community Action through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

MID WILLAMETTE VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Mid Willamette Valley Community Action?

More from the funding graph

MID WILLAMETTE VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Mid Willamette Valley Community Action?

More from the funding graph