· Private foundation
Michele & Brad Moore Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k32 grants · $41k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $54k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE | $22,500 |
| TEXAS BOOK FESTIVAL | $21,000 |
| MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION | $10,500 |
| NORTHERN NEVADA CHILDRENS CANCER FDN | $3,500 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER AUSTIN | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| GEN AUSTIN | $2,500 |
| FEATHER RIVER LAND TRUST | $2,000 |
| VETERENS GUEST HOUSE | $1,500 |
| UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS PRESS | $1,500 |
| COMMUNITY CHEST | $1,500 |
| THE EDDY HOUSE | $1,500 |
| FOOD BANK OF NORTHERN NEVADA | $1,500 |
| THE GIVE HOPE FOUNDATION | $1,500 |
| BOULDER PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 56% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
46 repeat relationships — 32 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TBTexas Book Festival9× · 2017–2025 · $136k · revenue +90%
- ATAUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE9× · 2017–2025 · $103k · revenue +307%
- PCPEOPLE'S COMMUNITY CLINIC INC3× · 2018–2025 · $22k · revenue +41%
Funded once
- MAMAKE A WISH OF NE CALIFORNIAone grant, 2018 · $30k
- SOSISTER OF OUR LADY OF MT CARMELone grant, 2018 · $5k
- GHGIVE HOPE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue -38%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.
The mission of denver botanic gardens is to connect people with plants, especially plants from the rocky mountain region and similar regions around the world, providing delight and enlightenment to everyone.
The mission of the colorado coalition for the homeless is to work collaboratively toward the prevention of homelessness and the creation of lasting solutions for families, children, and individuals who are experiencing or at-risk of…
We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.
Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…
The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…
United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.
Food bank of the rockies ignites the power of community to nourish people facing food insecurity.
End hunger together.
The vision of the csfc is to partner with the fire service and supplier partners across the state of colorado in their efforts to protect all of colorado's life and property from fire and other disasters. it is a dynamic organization,…
Heal utah's mission is to protect utah's environment and its people by promoting clean air, clean energy, and comprehensive solutions to radioactive and toxic waste.
Our mission is to provide high quality and equitable reproductive and sexual health services, abortion, and education to all people, regardless of any barriers to healthcare that they may face.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Children's Cabinet Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wake Forest University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Texas Book Festival ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE'S COMMUNITY CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds NEVADA LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds EDDY HOUSE ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds THERE WITH CARE ↗
- Who funds TRUCKEE DONNER LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds COLORADO CHAUTAUQUA ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Veterans Guest House Inc ↗
- Who funds WASHOE CASA FOUNDATION FKA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES ↗
- Who funds GENAUSTIN ↗
- Who funds Give Hope Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN NEVADA CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SPREAD THE WORD NEVADA ↗
- Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC ↗
- Who funds BOULDER PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HEALING WATERS FLY FISHING INC ↗
- Who funds ASHEVILLE WATCHDOG ↗
- Who funds Food Bank of Northern Nevada Inc ↗
- Who funds FEATHER RIVER LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds GIVE HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: NV Energy Charitable Foundation · Community Foundation of Northern Nevada · Austin Community Foundation Inc · Community Foundation Boulder County · The Nell J Redfield Foundation · The E L Cord Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Moody Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Earl and Elizabeth Ash Foundation of Nevada · Harry E and Eda L Montandon Charitable Tr · Renown Health
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Michele & Brad Moore Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Project Healing Waters Fly Fishing Inc — 46% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.