Skip to content
Michael and Ashley Mosley Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Michael and Ashley Mosley Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$35k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$123kRecreation & Sports$86kHealth$68kHuman Services$45kHousing & Shelter$14kFood & Nutrition$10kCrime & Legal$9kCommunity Improvement$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $27k
$500
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RAZORBACK FOUNDATION$17,160
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$10,000
FIRST LANDMARK BAPTIST CHURCH$5,000
Individual grant recipient$600
GRANT COUNTY MUSEUM$500
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$500
SHERIDAN HIGH SCHOOL$500
YELLOW JACKET TOUCHDOWN CLUB$250
GRANT COUNTY 4H$250
NATIONAL FIRE SAFETY COUNCIL$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%THE GAINES HOUSE: $3k → 17%THE GAINES HOUSE: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MI
NY
SD
KS
AR
TN
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$324k · 23 repeat orgs$51k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
28

Total granted

$324k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+63%

Still filing today

57%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $250 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationReligionFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RF
    RAZORBACK FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $78k · revenue +67%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $36k · revenue +33%
  • FC
    FINAL COMMAND MINISTRIES
    2× · 2017–2019 · $17k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • ES
    EASTER SEALS OF AR
    one grant, 2023 · $8k
  • CT
    CHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +20%
  • W
    WAL-MART
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arkansas Children's Inc

We champion children by making them better today and healthier tomorrow.arkansas children's will fundamentally transform healthcare delivery for the children of arkansas and beyond. arkansas children's core values are the organizational…

Health
2
Foundation for Sarcoidosis Research

The foundation for sarcoidosis research (fsr) is the leading international organization dedicated to finding a cure for sarcoidosis and improving care for sarcoidosis patients through research, education, and support. since its…

Philanthropy
3
Arkansas Children's Northwest Inc

We champion children by making them better today and healthier tomorrow.continued on schedule o.arkansas children's will fundamentally transform healthcare delivery for the children of arkansas and beyond. arkansas children's core values…

Health
4
Conquering Congenital Heart Disease

At conquering chd we exist to conquerin the most common birth defect. we engage, listen, learn, and act. we create visibility and empower all impacted by chd. we accomplish this through awareness, knowledge, community and research.

Health
5
Arkansas Children's Foundation

We champion children by making them better today and healthier tomorrow.continued on schedule o.arkansas children's will fundamentally transform healthcare delivery for the children of arkansas and beyond. arkansas children's core values…

Health
6
Arkansas Hospice Inc

To enhance the quality of life for those facing serious illness and loss by surrounding them with love and embracing them with the best in physical, emotional and spiritual care programs and services, and to help donors meet their…

Human Services
7
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
8
Arkansas Foundation for Medical Care Inc

To promote excellence in health care through evaluation and education

Health
9
Christian Healthcare Ministries Inc

To glorify god, show christian love, and experience god's presence as christians share each other's medical bills.

Religion
10
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
11
Arkansas Children's Medical Group Pllc

We champion children by making them better today and healthier tomorrow.continued on schedule oarkansas children's will fundamentally transform healthcare delivery for the children of arkansas and beyond. arkansas children's core values…

Health
12
American Cancer Society Inc

Improve the lives of people with cancer and their families through advocacy, research, and patient support, to ensure everyone has an opportunity to prevent, detect, treat, and survive cancer.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sheridan Golf Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
14/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST LANDMARK BAPTIST CHURCH: $85,000 · OtherFIRST LANDMARK BAPTIST CHURCHSECOND CHANCE YOUTH RANCH: $14,000 · OtherSECOND CHANCE YOUTH RANCHOUR HOUSE INC: $10,000 · OtherOUR HOUSE INCGRACE FELLOWSHIP BIBLE CHURCH: $8,500 · OtherEASTER SEALS OF AR: $7,500 · OtherPROCLAIM JUSTICE INC: $7,500 · Other+31 more: $49,521 · Other+31 moreRAZORBACK FOUNDATION INC: $77,750 · EducationRAZORBACK FOUNDATION IN…+1 more: $500 · EducationAmerican Heart Association Inc: $36,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Assoc…RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF ARKANSAS & NORTH LOUISIANA INC: $13,000 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUS…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $7,070 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED …ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $5,460 · HealthARKANSAS CHILDREN'S …CHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S TUMOR FOU…+1 more: $1,000 · HealthFINAL COMMAND MINISTRIES: $16,800 · ReligionWORKMATTERS: $10,000 · ReligionARKANSAS FOODBANK: $10,000 · Food & NutritionGAINES HOUSE INC: $3,500 · Human ServicesPULASKI COUNTY ADOPTION COALITION INC DBA PROJECT ZERO: $2,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesKICK START SHERIDAN INC: $3,275 · Community Improvement
Other$182,021Education$78,250Health$67,530Religion$26,800Food & Nutrition$10,000Human Services$6,500Community Improvement$3,275

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRAZORBACK FOUNDATION INC: $77,750 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $36,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF ARKANSAS & NORTH LOUISIANA INC: $13,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWORKMATTERS: $10,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetARKANSAS FOODBANK: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOUR HOUSE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPROCLAIM JUSTICE INC: $7,500 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $7,070 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $5,460 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGAINES HOUSE INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetKICK START SHERIDAN INC: $3,275 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetPULASKI COUNTY ADOPTION COALITION INC DBA PROJECT ZERO: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetEASTERSEALS ARKANSAS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP OZARK FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHERIDAN GOLF CLUB INC: $500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SIOUX FALLS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL FIRE SAFETY COUNCIL INC: $500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWreaths Across America: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RAZORBACK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds FINAL COMMAND MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF ARKANSAS & NORTH LOUISIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds WORKMATTERS ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS FOODBANK ↗
  • Who funds OUR HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds PROCLAIM JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GAINES HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds KICK START SHERIDAN INC ↗
  • Who funds Christian Health Service Corps Inc ↗
  • Who funds PULASKI COUNTY ADOPTION COALITION INC DBA PROJECT ZERO ↗
  • Who funds EASTERSEALS ARKANSAS ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP OZARK FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arkansas Community Fo…Frank D Hickingbotham…C Louis and Mary C Ca…Nabholz Charitable Fo…Roy and Christine Stu…Raymond James Charita…Shell USA Company Fou…Natl Christian Charit…The Pfizer Foundation…American Endowment Fo…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…
Arkansas Community Foundation IncAR20.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Frank D Hickingbotham Foundation Trust · C Louis and Mary C Cabe Foundation · Nabholz Charitable Foundation · Roy and Christine Sturgis Charitable And · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Shell USA Company Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Michael and Ashley Mosley Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Michael and Ashley Mosley Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Michael and Ashley Mosley Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home