Skip to content
Mex-Am Cultural Foundation Inc % Grant Herrmann Schwartz & Klinger at a glance

· Private foundation

Mex-Am Cultural Foundation Inc % Grant Herrmann Schwartz & Klinger

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$33k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$33k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$282kHealth$45kHuman Services$39kInternational$36kHousing & Shelter$10k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$33,264
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART$33,264
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COVENANT HOUSE INTERNATIONAL: $20k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $10k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE INTERNATIONAL: $8k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$365k · 10 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
4

Total granted

$365k
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+43%

Still filing today

90%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureInternationalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART
    3× · 2023–2025 · $103k · revenue +19%
  • JL
    JOSE LIMON DANCE FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $45k · revenue +49%
  • TI
    THE ICLA DA SILVA FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $45k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • AD
    AMIGOS DEL MUSEO DEL BARRIO INC EL MUSEO DEL BARRIOgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $28k · revenue +43%
  • CQ
    CINE QUA NON LAB
    one grant, 2023 · $8k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
2
Institute of Contemporary Art Miami Inc

The institute of contemporary art, miami (ica miami), is dedicated to promoting the work of contemporary artists, and to the exchange of art and ideas throughout the miami region and internationally. through an energetic calendar of…

Arts & Culture
3
Solomon R Guggenheim Foundation

Committed to innovation, the solomon r. guggenheim foundation (the "foundation") collects, (continued on schedule o)

Arts & Culture
4
San Diego Museum of Art

To inspire, educate and cultivate curiosity through great works of art.

Arts & Culture
5
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
6
Minnesota Museum of American Art

The m inspires understandings of identities, experiences, and complex truths through american art.

Arts & Culture
7
The Neue Galerie New York
Arts & Culture
8
San Jose Museum of Art Association

Nurture empathy and connection by engaging communities with socially relevant contemporary art

Arts & Culture
9
Figge Art Museum

The figge art museum actively serves the public by promoting appreciation and creation of visual art through education and by collecting, conserving, and exhibiting art. as a vital, responsive institution, the museum brings art and people…

Arts & Culture
10
Philadelphia Museum of Art

The philadelphia museum of art - in partnership with the city, the region, and art museums around the globe - seeks to preserve, enhance, interpret, and extend the reach of its great collection in particular, and the visual arts in…

Arts & Culture
11
The National Museum of Women in the Arts

The mission of the national museum of women in the arts is to collect, conserve and elevate the achievements of women artists from all nationalities and to educate the public on their outstanding accomplishments. we strive to accomplish…

—
12
Kadist Collection Manager Inc
Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Amigos Del Museo Del Barrio Inc El Museo Del Barrio; the most unlike its peers is Global Goods Partners Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $103,264 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ARTJOSE LIMON DANCE FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 · Arts & CultureJOSE LIMON DANCE FOUNDATION INCNATIONAL MUSEUM OF MEXICAN ART FKA MEXICAN FINE ARTS CENTER MUSEUM: $30,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL MUSEUM OF MEXICAN ART FKA MEXICAN FINE ARTS CENTER MUSEUMAMIGOS DEL MUSEO DEL BARRIO INC EL MUSEO DEL BARRIO: $27,500 · Arts & CultureAMIGOS DEL MUSEO DEL BARRIO INC EL MUSEO DEL BARRIOTHE PARRISH ART MUSEUM INC: $22,500 · Arts & CultureTHE PARRISH ART MUSEUM INCNATIONAL DANCE INSTITUTE: $17,500 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL DANCE INSTITUTEQUEENS MUSEUM OF ART: $16,000 · Arts & CultureQUEENS MUSEUM OF ARTTHE ICLA DA SILVA FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 · OtherTHE ICLA DA SILVA F…MANO A MANO: $12,500 · OtherMANO A MANOCINE QUA NON LAB: $7,500 · OtherCINE QUA NON LABIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant re…COVENANT HOUSE: $42,500 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HO…AMERICAS SOCIETY INC: $31,000 · InternationalAMERICAS …GLOBAL GOODS PARTNERS INC: $5,000 · InternationalGLOBAL GO…
Arts & Culture$261,764Other$71,000Human Services$42,500International$36,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $103,264 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJOSE LIMON DANCE FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetTHE ICLA DA SILVA FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $42,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAS SOCIETY INC: $31,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL MUSEUM OF MEXICAN ART FKA MEXICAN FINE ARTS CENTER MUSEUM: $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAMIGOS DEL MUSEO DEL BARRIO INC EL MUSEO DEL BARRIO: $27,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE PARRISH ART MUSEUM INC: $22,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL DANCE INSTITUTE: $17,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetQUEENS MUSEUM OF ART: $16,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL GOODS PARTNERS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ford FoundationTerra Foundation for …The Bank of America C…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Ford FoundationNY15.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ford Foundation · Terra Foundation for American Art · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mex-Am Cultural Foundation Inc % Grant Herrmann Schwartz & Klinger funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mex-Am Cultural Foundation Inc % Grant Herrmann Schwartz & Klinger. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mex-Am Cultural Foundation Inc % Grant Herrmann Schwartz & Klinger?

    Find your warmest path to Mex-Am Cultural Foundation Inc % Grant Herrmann Schwartz & Klinger through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mex-Am Cultural Foundation Inc % Grant Herrmann Schwartz & Klinger’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home