Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Metta Tree Foundation 43-59869

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222025.

Food & Nutrition$1.3MHealth$965kHuman Services$500kEducation$150kRecreation & Sports$100kPhilanthropy$100k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $1.1M
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$175,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GIVE DIRECTLY$250,000
THE INSTITUTE FOR ETHNOMEDICINE$200,000
CHATTANOOGA AREA FOOD BANK$175,000
ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$175,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$175,000
YMCA ROME AND FLOYD COUNTY$150,000
FOUNDERS PLEDGE INC$100,000
DUKE UNIVERSITY$75,000
ROME FLOYD COMMUNITY SOUP KITCHEN$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YMCA OF ROME & FLOYD COUNTY: $50k → 15%YMCA OF ROME & FLOYD COUNTY: $50k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
WY
MD
TN
NC
DC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.8M · 14 repeat orgs$215k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
4

Total granted

$2.8M
$215k

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHealthEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GIVEDIRECTLY INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $500k · revenue +18%
  • CA
    Chattanooga Area Food Bank Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $375k · revenue +12%
  • AC
    ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $300k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • HM
    HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $75k
  • DU
    DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • HM
    HARVARD MEDICINE SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewelers of America Inc

Jewelers of america, the most trusted and influential voice of the jewelry industry, empowers and unites its members through expert guidance and advocacy, driving excellence, integrity, and success in an ever-changing marketplace.

2
National Association of Corporate Directors

We empower directors and transform boards to be future ready.

Public Benefit
3
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
4
National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors

Empowering financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.

5
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
6
National Association for College Admission Counseling

Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.

Education
7
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

8
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

9
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

10
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
11
University of Maryland Eye Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
12
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlanta Community Food Bank Inc and the most unlike its peers is Young Mens Christian Association of Rome and Floyd County Georgia Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK — $250,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANKYMCA ROME AND FLOYD COUNTY — $225,000 · OtherYMCA ROME AND FLOYD COUNTYJOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY & MEDICINE — $125,000 · OtherJOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY & MEDICINEBRAIN CHEMISTRY LABS — $125,000 · OtherBRAIN CHEMISTRY LABSSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF E TN — $100,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF E TNHARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL — $75,000 · OtherHARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOLDUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE — $50,000 · OtherHARVARD MEDICINE SCHOOL — $50,000 · OtherDUKE UNIVERISTY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE — $40,000 · Other+2 more — $40,000 · OtherChattanooga Area Food Bank Inc — $375,000 · Food & NutritionChattanooga Area Food Ba…ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC — $300,000 · Food & NutritionATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD B…GIVEDIRECTLY INC — $500,000 · Human ServicesGIVEDIRECTLY INCYoung Mens Christian Association of Rome and Floyd County Georgia Inc — $100,000 · Human ServicesYoung Mens Christian …THE INSTITUTE FOR ETHNOMEDICINE INC DBA BRAIN CHEMISTRY LABS — $400,000 · HealthTHE INSTITUTE FOR …NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH — $100,000 · HealthNATIONAL COUNCIL F…DUKE UNIVERSITY — $150,000 · EducationFOUNDERS PLEDGE INC — $100,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,080,000Food & Nutrition$675,000Human Services$600,000Health$500,000Education$150,000Philanthropy$100,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC — $500,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE FOR ETHNOMEDICINE INC DBA BRAIN CHEMISTRY LABS — $400,000 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetChattanooga Area Food Bank Inc — $375,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC — $300,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $150,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYoung Mens Christian Association of Rome and Floyd County Georgia Inc — $100,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH — $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GIVEDIRECTLY INC
  • Who funds THE INSTITUTE FOR ETHNOMEDICINE INC DBA BRAIN CHEMISTRY LABS
  • Who funds Chattanooga Area Food Bank Inc
  • Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Young Mens Christian Association of Rome and Floyd County Georgia Inc
  • Who funds FOUNDERS PLEDGE INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Metta Tree Foundation 43-59869 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph