Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mervin B and Berenice R France Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$92k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$149kHuman Services$112kEducation$57kHousing & Shelter$41kReligion$41kInternational$33kAnimals$26kPublic Benefit$10k
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $72k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$7,645
Median grant
9
States reached
$816k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOUNDATION OF THE OLD GUARD$10,000
BLUECOATS INC$10,000
US NAVAL ACADEMY$7,661
CAFE OF LIFE$7,661
SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN$7,661
CARMEL OF THE HOLY FAMILY$7,661
AMIGOS DE TEXAS$7,645
FRANCISCAN LIFE PROCESS CENTER$7,645
METRO ATLANTA RECOVER RESIDENCES$7,645
ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY$6,555
ROBERT TOMKO MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND$4,413
ISLAND DOLPHIN CARE$4,260
K9S FOR WARRIORS$2,935
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 59% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%UCSF FOUNDATION: $22k → 10%CARMEL OF THE HOLY FAMILY: $12k → 13%ST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY: $10k → 17%AMIGOS DE TEXAS: $8k → 16%SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN: $12k → 10%FRANCISCAN LIFE PROCESS CENTER: $9k → 12%METRO ATLANTA RECOVER RESIDENCES: $8k → 14%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY: $7k → 14%BLUECOATS INC: $13k → 17%MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $8k → 12%FOUNDATION OF THE OLD GUARD: $10k → 7%US NAVAL ACADEMY: $12k → 6%CARMEL OF THE HOLY FAMILY: $8k → 13%ST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY: $6k → 17%AMIGOS DE TEXAS: $8k → 16%K9'S FOR WARRIORS: $13k → 6%SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN: $8k → 10%FRANCISCAN LIFE PROCESS CENTER: $8k → 12%METRO ATLANTA RECOVER RESIDENCES: $8k → 14%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY: $6k → 14%BLUECOATS INC: $10k → 17%MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $6k → 12%USO METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON-BALTIMORE: $7k → 7%US NAVAL ACADEMY: $8k → 6%CARMEL OF THE HOLY FAMILY: $7k → 13%ST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY: $5k → 17%AMIGOS DE TEXAS: $8k → 16%K9'S FOR WARRIORS: $6k → 6%SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN: $7k → 10%FRANCISCAN LIFE PROCESS CENTER: $7k → 12%METRO ATLANTA RECOVER RESIDENCES: $7k → 14%BLUECOATS INC: $10k → 17%USO METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON-BALTIMORE: $7k → 7%US NAVAL ACADEMY: $7k → 6%CARMEL OF THE HOLY FAMILY: $7k → 13%AMIGOS DE TEXAS: $7k → 16%K9'S FOR WARRIORS: $5k → 6%SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN: $7k → 10%FRANCISCAN LIFE PROCESS CENTER: $7k → 12%METRO ATLANTA RECOVER RESIDENCES: $7k → 14%BLUECOATS INC: $6k → 17%USO METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON-BALTIMORE: $5k → 7%US NAVAL ACADEMY: $7k → 6%CARMEL OF THE HOLY FAMILY: $6k → 13%SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN: $6k → 10%FRANCISCAN LIFE PROCESS CENTER: $6k → 12%METRO ATLANTA RECOVER RESIDENCES: $6k → 14%US NAVAL ACADEMY: $6k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
OH
NJ
CT
CA
VA
MD
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$436k · 14 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue 0% since the first grant, against -47% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
1

Total granted

$436k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
-47%

Still filing today

43%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalInternationalAnimalsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CAFE OF LIFE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $41k · revenue +130%
  • BI
    BLUECOATS INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $39k · revenue +87%
  • K9S FOR WARRIORS INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $26k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $22k · revenue -47%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States War Dogs Association Inc

The mission of the corporation is to provide support for the war dogs of the united states military. the organization provides care packages to war dogs and their handlers serving overseas. the organization also provides support for…

Animals
2
United Service Organization Uso Council of San Diego

The primary mission of the uso san diego is to strengthen america's military service members by keeping them connected to family, home and country, throughout their service to the nation.

—
3
Usvets - Texas

The successful transition of u.s. military veterans and their families through the provision of housing, counseling, career development and comprehensive support.

Human Services
4
K9S for Warriors Research Institute Inc

Research and advocacy for veterans with post-traumatic stress and the prevention of veteran suicide.

—
5
Dogs for Life Inc

The corporation's mission is to improve the quality of life for people and dogs through training assistance dogs, pet therapy dogs, and owning and operating an off-leash dog park. the corporation also assists with enhancing the quality of…

Animals
6
Leashes of Valor

Our organization's mission is to raise awareness for and provide physical aid and support to disabled us military veterans. our program covers a crucial gap in the industry-a veteran operated organization, that can assist veterans with…

Public Benefit
7
Operation Delta Dog Inc

The organizations mission is to rescue and train homeless dogs to become service dogs for united states veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder (ptsd), traumatic brain injury (tbi), and related challenges.

Animals
8
Usc Care Medical Group Inc

To promote health by engaging in the practice of medicine for patients of hospitals affiliated with the university of southern california keck school of medicine and elsewhere. to provide medical care to the sick and injured who may come…

Health
9
Uso Foundation

The mission of the uso foundation (foundation) is to support uso inc.'s (uso) mission to strengthen the well-being of the people serving in america's military and their families.

—
10
Uso of Metropolitan New York Inc

To strengthen america's military service members by keeping them connected to family, home and country, throughout their service to the nation.

—
11
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
12
The Wounded Blue

To improve the lives of injured and disabled law-enforcement officers through support, education, assistance and legislation

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is K9S for Warriors Inc; the most unlike its peers is Amigos De Texas Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CARMEL OF THE HOLY FAMILY: $41,030 · OtherCARMEL OF THE HOLY FAMILYUS NAVAL ACADEMY: $41,030 · OtherUS NAVAL ACADEMYSHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN: $41,030 · OtherSHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMENFRANCISCAN LIFE PROCESS CENTER: $37,008 · OtherFRANCISCAN LIFE PROCESS CENTERST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY: $34,694 · OtherST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETYUSO OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON-BALTIMORE INC: $19,222 · OtherUSO OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON-BALTIMORE INCROBERT TOMKO MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $16,070 · OtherROBERT TOMKO MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUNDMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $13,244 · OtherMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTERMETRO ATLANTA RECOVERY RESIDENCES INC: $35,414 · HealthMETRO ATLANTA…ISLAND DOLPHIN CARE INC: $18,700 · HealthISLAND DOLPHI…CAFE OF LIFE INC: $41,030 · Housing & ShelterCAFE OF L…BLUECOATS INC: $38,500 · Crime & LegalBLUECOATS…AMIGOS DE TEXAS INC: $32,670 · InternationalK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $26,435 · AnimalsUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $22,395 · EducationTHE FOUNDATION OF THE OLD GUARD INC: $10,000 · Public Benefit
Other$243,328Health$54,114Housing & Shelter$41,030Crime & Legal$38,500International$32,670Animals$26,435Education$22,395Public Benefit$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAFE OF LIFE INC: $41,030 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetBLUECOATS INC: $38,500 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetMETRO ATLANTA RECOVERY RESIDENCES INC: $35,414 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAMIGOS DE TEXAS INC: $32,670 over 5y, 40% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $26,435 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $22,395 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUSO OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON-BALTIMORE INC: $19,222 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetISLAND DOLPHIN CARE INC: $18,700 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION OF THE OLD GUARD INC: $10,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAFE OF LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUECOATS INC ↗
  • Who funds METRO ATLANTA RECOVERY RESIDENCES INC ↗
  • Who funds AMIGOS DE TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds K9S FOR WARRIORS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds USO OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON-BALTIMORE INC ↗
  • Who funds ISLAND DOLPHIN CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION OF THE OLD GUARD INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA8.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mervin B and Berenice R France Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mervin B and Berenice R France Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mervin B and Berenice R France’s filings →

More from the funding graph