Skip to content

Illinois · Private foundation

Mendelson-Wolff Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$126k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
17
Grants FY2025
24
Organizations funded FY2024
46%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$2,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$50,000
Organizations funded a year
13 to 24
FY2022 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
5
Total assets, FY2025
$1.6M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 46% of the organizations Mendelson-Wolff Family Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 21% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationInternationalPublic BenefitFood & NutritionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving17$126k41%
FY202424$71k46%
FY202323$49k74%
FY202213$34kn/a
91% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$64kReligion$63kEducation$59kPhilanthropy$53kInternational$28kYouth Development$7kHealth$6kCivil Rights$6kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2022 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
University of Chicago$53,00030%
SkyArt NFP$28,06440%
Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago$21,00030%
Lookingglass Theatre Company$15,50030%
Mishkan Chicago$9,9673n/a
Spertus Institute for Jewish Learning and Leadership$8,50010%
Chicago Humanities Festival$7,50020%
Storycatchers$5,50020%
Temple Sholom of Chicago$5,1551n/a
Chicago Abortion Fund$5,02510%
Show all 26 grantees
All grantees of Mendelson-Wolff Family Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
University of Chicago$53,00030%
SkyArt NFP$28,06440%
Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago$21,00030%
Lookingglass Theatre Company$15,50030%
Mishkan Chicago$9,9673n/a
Spertus Institute for Jewish Learning and Leadership$8,50010%
Chicago Humanities Festival$7,50020%
Storycatchers$5,50020%
Temple Sholom of Chicago$5,1551n/a
Chicago Abortion Fund$5,02510%
Grant Park Orchestral Association$5,00020%
Run for Something Action Fund$2,00010%
University of Illinois Foundation$2,00010%
The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois$2,0001n/a
The Marfan Foundation Inc$2,00030%
Open Books Ltd$2,00010%
Anshe Emet Synagogue$2,0001n/a
3arts Inc$2,00010%
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum$1,50030%
Friends of the Israel Defense Forces$1,00010%
Greater Chicago Food Depository$75020%
Restore Justice Foundation$51210%
American Friends of Magen David Adom$50010%
Red Tent Fund$50010%
MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger$43320%
Chicago Jewish Historical Society$21620%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 22 recipients with no EIN on record ($97k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Mendelson-Wolff Family Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Chicago: $53,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSkyArt NFP: $28,064 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetJewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago: $21,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLookingglass Theatre Company: $15,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSpertus Institute for Jewish Learning and Leadership: $8,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChicago Humanities Festival: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetStorycatchers: $5,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetChicago Abortion Fund: $5,025 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGrant Park Orchestral Association: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRun for Something Action Fund: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Marfan Foundation Inc: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOpen Books Ltd: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget3arts Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of the Israel Defense Forces: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGreater Chicago Food Depository: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRestore Justice Foundation: $512 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of Magen David Adom: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRed Tent Fund: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger: $433 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Jewish Historical Society: $216 over 2y, 0.4% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 22.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

John D and Catherine T Macarthur FoundationIL23× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Lloyd a Fry Foundation · Arkes Family Foundation · Joseph & Bessie Feinberg Foundation · Reva and David Logan Foundation · Field Foundation of Illinois · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Allstate Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Mendelson-Wolff Family Foundation with peer funders

About Mendelson-Wolff Family Foundation

How much does Mendelson-Wolff Family Foundation give?
Mendelson-Wolff Family Foundation reported 17 grants totaling $126,198 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 13 and 24 organizations a year over FY2022 to FY2024.
What does Mendelson-Wolff Family Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2022 to FY2025, its largest causes are Arts & Culture (21%), Religion (20%), Education (19%).
Who are Mendelson-Wolff Family Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2022 to FY2025: University of Chicago ($53k), SkyArt NFP ($28k), Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago ($21k).
Does Mendelson-Wolff Family Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 46% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Mendelson-Wolff Family Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Mendelson-Wolff Family Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation, The Chicago Community Trust, Arie and Ida Crown Memorial.
Where is Mendelson-Wolff Family Foundation based?
Mendelson-Wolff Family Foundation is based in IL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mendelson-Wolff Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph