Skip to content

· Private foundation

Melza M and Frank Theodore Barr Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Science & Tech$12MArts & Culture$5.7MHealth$3.9MEducation$800kEnvironment$200kAnimals$160kFood & Nutrition$160kPhilanthropy$100kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $80k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
$20,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Glaucoma Research Foundation$1,000,000
Sustainable Harvest Int'l$20,000
Wild Earth Allies$20,000
Raptor Trust$20,000
Center for Amazon Community Ecology$10,000
People and Plants International$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 83% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Sustainable Harvest Int'l: $20k → 16%Glaucoma Research Foundation: $1.0M → 10%Crocker Art Museum: $500k → 12%California Institute of Technology: $5.0M → 14%UC Davis Foundation: $500k → 16%Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors: $100k → 17%Menil Collection: $20k → 16%Sustainable Harvest Int'l: $20k → 14%Raptor Trust: $20k → 4%Aids Resource Foundation for Childr: $20k → 16%Wild Earth Allies: $20k → 8%Sustainable Harvest Int'l: $20k → 11%Sustainable Harvest Int'l: $20k → 16%Glaucoma Research Foundation: $1.0M → 10%Crocker Art Museum Assoc: $343k → 12%California Institute of Technology: $5.0M → 14%UC Davis Foundation: $100k → 16%Raptor Trust: $20k → 4%Aids Resource Foundation for Childr: $20k → 16%Wild Earth Allies: $20k → 8%Sustainable Harvest Int'l: $20k → 11%Sustainable Harvest Int'l: $20k → 16%Glaucoma Research Foundation: $800k → 10%Crocker Art Museum: $231k → 12%California Institute of Technology: $500k → 14%Houston Ballet Foundation: $650k → 16%Raptor Trust: $20k → 4%Aids Resource Foundation for Childr: $20k → 16%Wild Earth Allies: $20k → 8%Sustainable Harvest Int'l: $20k → 16%Glaucoma Research Foundation: $600k → 10%Crocker Art Museum: $119k → 12%California Institute of Technology: $320k → 14%Glaucoma Research Foundation: $100k → 10%California Institute of Technology: $210k → 14%Houston Ballet Foundation: $100k → 16%University of California Davis Heal: $250k → 12%Caltech: $200k → 14%Houston Ballet Foundation: $1.5M → 16%California Institute of Technology: $200k → 14%Houston Ballet Foundation: $1.0M → 16%California Institute of Technology: $200k → 14%Houston Ballet Foundation: $100k → 16%California Institute of Technology: $200k → 14%Houston Public Media: $500k → 16%California Institute of Technology: $50k → 14%Houston Ballet Foundation: $100k → 16%Houston Public Media: $100k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
MD
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$22M · 14 repeat orgs$474k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
3

Total granted

$22M
$464k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
0%

Still filing today

86%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentEducationHealthAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GR
    GLAUCOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2025 · $3.5M · revenue +74%
  • HB
    Houston Ballet Foundation
    6× · 2018–2023 · $3.5M · revenue +14%
  • TU
    THE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2024 · $600k · revenue +93%

Funded once

  • UO
    University of California Davis Heal
    one grant, 2018 · $250k
  • TC
    THE CALTECH Y
    one grant, 2018 · $200k · revenue -5%
  • NA
    Northeast Area Development Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $14k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
2
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
3
Nature and Culture International

Nature and culture international conserves biologically diverse landscapes in latin america, in concert with local cultures, for the well-being of the planet.

Environment
4
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
5
Natural History Institute

Natural History Institute is organized to provide leadership and resources for a revitalized practice of natural history that integrates art, science, and humanities to promote the health and well-being of humans and the rest of the…

Arts & Culture
6
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
7
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
8
The Rand Corporation

Help improve policy and decision making through research and analysis.

Public Benefit
9
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
10
The Frick Collection

The Frick Collection (the "Collection") operates an internationally recognized art museum and library program for the inspiration and enjoyment of the public and for the advancement of the study of fine arts and kindred subjects.

—
11
Rhode Island School of Design

The mission of rhode island school of design, through its college and museum,is to educate its students and the public in the creation and (see schedule o)appreciation of works of art and design, to discover and transmit knowledge and to…

Education
12
California College of the Arts

California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Houston Ballet Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Northeast Area Development Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $11,680,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYTHE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION: $600,000 · Education+1 more: $200,000 · EducationHouston Ballet Foundation: $3,450,000 · Arts & CultureHouston Ballet FoundationCROCKER ART MUSEUM ASSOCIATION: $1,210,729 · Arts & CultureCROCKER ART MUSEUM ASSOCI…THE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON: $425,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS H…+1 more: $45,000 · Arts & CultureGLAUCOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $3,500,000 · HealthGLAUCOMA RESEARCH…Individual grant recipient: $600,000 · OtherUniversity of California Davis Heal: $250,000 · OtherAIDS Resource Foundation for Children: $120,000 · OtherSACHA RUNA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $40,000 · Other+1 more: $14,000 · OtherWild Earth Allies Inc: $160,000 · EnvironmentSustainable Harvest International: $160,000 · EnvironmentCENTER FOR AMAZON COMMUNITY ECOLOGY: $30,000 · Environment+1 more: $10,000 · EnvironmentTHE RAPTOR TRUST: $160,000 · AnimalsROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $100,000 · Philanthropy
Education$12,480,000Arts & Culture$5,130,729Health$3,500,000Other$1,024,000Environment$360,000Animals$160,000Philanthropy$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $11,680,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGLAUCOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $3,500,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetHouston Ballet Foundation: $3,450,000 over 6y, 3.9% of budgetCROCKER ART MUSEUM ASSOCIATION: $1,210,729 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetTHE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION: $600,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON: $425,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CALTECH Y: $200,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetTHE RAPTOR TRUST: $160,000 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetWild Earth Allies Inc: $160,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetSustainable Harvest International: $160,000 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetAIDS Resource Foundation for Children: $120,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMenil Foundation Inc: $45,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR AMAZON COMMUNITY ECOLOGY: $30,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetNortheast Area Development Inc: $14,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds GLAUCOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Houston Ballet Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CROCKER ART MUSEUM ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON ↗
  • Who funds THE CALTECH Y ↗
  • Who funds THE RAPTOR TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Wild Earth Allies Inc ↗
  • Who funds Sustainable Harvest International ↗
  • Who funds AIDS Resource Foundation for Children ↗
  • Who funds ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC ↗
  • Who funds Menil Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR AMAZON COMMUNITY ECOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds Northeast Area Development Inc ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE & PLANTS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Melza M and Frank Theodore Barr Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Melza M and Frank Theodore Barr Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Melza M and Frank Theodore Barr Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Melza M and Frank Theodore Barr Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Melza M and Frank Theodore Barr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph