Skip to content

· Private foundation

Melvin & Geraldine Hoven Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$321k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $127k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $140k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Michael J Fox Foundation$70,000
Post$70,000
Second Harvest Food Bank$25,000
CTA Disaster Relief Fund$20,000
Yosemite Conservancy$20,000
Sweet Home Alumni Foundation$17,000
University of Oregon Foundation$15,000
Wildland Firefighter Foundation$10,000
Los Altos Mountain View Community F$10,000
Silicon Valley Education Foundation$10,000
American Red Cross$5,000
Mountain View Educational Foundatio$5,000
Land Trust for Santa Cruz$5,000
St Nicholas and St William Parish$5,000
Special Operations Warrior Foundati$5,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%American Red Cross: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sonoma Valley Education Foundation

The Sonoma Valley Education Foundation exists to improve education by enriching teaching, inspiring learning, and advancing innovative programs that enable every student to succeed.

Philanthropy
2
The Sierra Fund

The Sierra Fund (TSF) is a non-profit organization with a mission to restore ecosystem and community resiliency in the Sierra Nevada.

Environment
3
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
4
Uc Riverside Foundation

To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.

Education
5
Santa Barbara Education Foundation

Santa Barbara Education Foundation (SBEF) provides and supports programs that enrich the academic, artistic, and personal development of all students in the Santa Barbara Unified School District.

Education
6
San Ramon Valley Education Foundation

The San Ramon Valley Education Foundation invests in education, supports parent organizations, and engages our community for the benefit of and in partnership with the San Ramon Valley Unified School District.

Education
7
Cal State East Bay Educational Foundation

To accept and manage restricted and unrestricted gifts benefiting california state university east bay. additionally, the trustees support the university through advocacy, development, personal contributions and counsel to the university's…

Education
8
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
9
Moraga Education Foundation

MEF raises funds to preserve and enhance educational opportunities for all students attending Moraga public schools, through a broad-based community effort.

Education
10
Walnut Creek Education Foundation K-12

Enhance the education of the students of Las Lomas High School and the schools within the Walnut Creek School District.

—
11
Sierra State Parks Foundation

The Sierra State Parks Foundation provides critically needed financial and professional support to the Lake Tahoe-Donner Sierra State Parks for Education, Restoration, and Cultural and Environmental Preservation in partnership with…

Recreation & Sports
12
California State University Foundation

Established in 1962, the foundation is the central foundation for the california state university (csu) system and serves the office of the chancellor. the foundation exists to support excellence in teaching and learning, and to serve the…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Los Altos Educational Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Norcal Boxer Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
0/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Post: $70,000 · OtherPostSecond Harvest Food Bank: $25,000 · OtherSecond Harvest Food BankCTA Disaster Relief Fund: $20,000 · OtherCTA Disaster Relief FundSWEET HOME ALUMNI FOUNDATION: $17,000 · OtherSWEET HOME ALUMNI FOUNDATIONLos Altos Mountain View Community F: $10,000 · OtherLos Altos Mountain View Community F+8 more: $34,000 · Other+8 moreTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $70,000 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDA…YOSEMITE FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsUNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION: $15,000 · EducationMountain View Educational Foundation: $5,000 · EducationWILDLAND FIREFIGHTER FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EnvironmentSAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUE: $5,000 · EnvironmentSILICON VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Community ImprovementLOS ALTOS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyEAST PALO ALTO KIDS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$176,000Health$70,000Recreation & Sports$20,000Education$20,000Environment$15,000Community Improvement$10,000Philanthropy$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $70,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOSEMITE FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSILICON VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWILDLAND FIREFIGHTER FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLOS ALTOS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAST PALO ALTO KIDS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMountain View Educational Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMOUNTAIN VIEW LOS ALTOS HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVENTANA WILDLIFE SOCIETY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNorcal Boxer Rescue: $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA15.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Bright Funds Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Melvin & Geraldine Hoven Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Melvin & Geraldine Hoven Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Melvin & Geraldine Hoven Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Melvin & Geraldine Hoven Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Melvin & Geraldine Hoven’s filings →

    More from the funding graph