Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Mellema Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$80k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212024.

Human Services$131kHealth$76kFood & Nutrition$63kEducation$55kEnvironment$44kHousing & Shelter$21kInternational$21k
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS MYELOMA CENTER FOUNDATION$10,000
ROOSMOOR SCHOLARSHIP FUND$8,000
JOHN MUIR LAND TRUST$6,000
TRUCKEE DONNER LAND TRUST$6,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST BAY$5,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$5,000
LOAVES AND FISHES OF CONTRA COSTA$5,000
MEALS ON WHEELS OF CONTRACOSTA$5,000
WHITMAN COLLEGE$5,000
CONTRA COSTA SOLANO FOOD BANK$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $131k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $100k → 9%MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $20k → 9%MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $6k → 9%MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$386k · 11 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
1

Total granted

$386k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+1%

Still filing today

82%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
EducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesHealthFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JM
    JOHN MUIR HEALTH FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2023 · $66k · revenue +113%
  • BO
    BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF WHITMAN COLLEGE
    4× · 2021–2024 · $26k · revenue +63%
  • JM
    John Muir Land Trust prev Muir Heritage Land Trust
    4× · 2021–2024 · $22k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • CU
    CALVIN UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +1%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
John Muir Health

The mission of john muir is to improve the health of the communities we serve with quality and compassion.

Health
2
Marin Agricultural Land Trust

Malt's mission is to permanently protect marin's agricultural land for agricultural use. malt's vision for marin county is a thriving and inclusive agricultural community in a healthy and diverse natural environment.

Food & Nutrition
3
Meals On Wheels of San Francisco Inc

To provide isolated homebound seniors in san francisco with nutritious meals, daily human contact, and supportive services to prevent their premature institutionalization.

4
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
5
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
6
Sustainable Conservation

Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…

Environment
7
Monterra Credit Union

Passionately deliver relevant products, services, and education tailored to help our members, employees, and communities achieve their financial goals.

Public Benefit
8
California Institute of Integral Studies

Ciis is an institution of higher education that encourages an interdisciplinary approach to learning. over 1,700 students are enrolled in masters, doctoral, bachelor of arts completion programs, and certifications. ours is a mosaic of…

Education
9
Land Trust of Santa Cruz County

Land trust of santa cruz county (the organization) was incorporated in california as a not-for-profit corporation in 1978. the mission of the organization is to protect, care for, and connect all people to the vibrant natural and working…

Environment
10
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
11
California Farmland Trust

The mission of the California Farmland Trust is to help farmers protect the best farmland in the world.

Environment
12
The Health Trust

The mission is to build health equity in silicon valley.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Monument Crisis Center and the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels Contra Costa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER — $131,000 · Human ServicesMONUMENT CRISIS CENTERJOHN MUIR HEALTH FOUNDATION — $66,000 · HealthJOHN MUIR HEALTH F…CONTRA COSTA SOLANO FOOD BANK — $21,000 · OtherCONTRA COSTA SOLAN…Loaves and Fishes of Contra Costa — $21,000 · OtherLoaves and Fishes …ROOSMOOR SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $14,000 · OtherROOSMOOR SCHOLARSH…UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS MYELOMA CENTER FOUNDATION — $10,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ARKA…John Muir Land Trust prev Muir Heritage Land Trust — $22,000 · EnvironmentJohn Muir La…TRUCKEE DONNER LAND TRUST — $22,000 · EnvironmentTRUCKEE DONN…BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF WHITMAN COLLEGE — $26,000 · EducationBOARD OF TR…CALVIN UNIVERSITY — $15,000 · EducationCALVIN UNIV…MEALS ON WHEELS CONTRA COSTA INC — $21,000 · Food & NutritionHABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST BAY SILICON VALLEY — $21,000 · Housing & ShelterMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $21,000 · International
Human Services$131,000Health$66,000Other$66,000Environment$44,000Education$41,000Food & Nutrition$21,000Housing & Shelter$21,000International$21,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMONUMENT CRISIS CENTER — $131,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetJOHN MUIR HEALTH FOUNDATION — $66,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBOARD OF TRUSTEES OF WHITMAN COLLEGE — $26,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJohn Muir Land Trust prev Muir Heritage Land Trust — $22,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTRUCKEE DONNER LAND TRUST — $22,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetLoaves and Fishes of Contra Costa — $21,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS CONTRA COSTA INC — $21,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST BAY SILICON VALLEY — $21,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $21,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCALVIN UNIVERSITY — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

East Bay Community FoundationCA15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: East Bay Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Hedco Foundation · Dean and Margaret Lesher Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Mellema Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mellema Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Mellema Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph