Skip to content

· Private foundation

Melchizedek Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$400k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$95k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$497kCrime & Legal$446kHealth$290kEducation$284kRecreation & Sports$172kHuman Services$108kPhilanthropy$92kHousing & Shelter$43kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $46k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $349k
$53,972
Median grant
3
States reached
$6.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REDEEMER BIBLE CHURCH$95,100
VALERIE'S VICTORY FOR VETERANS INC$72,945
Individual grant recipient$71,500
SHEPHERD'S HOUSE BIBLE CHURCH$55,500
GILBERT CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS$53,972
MT NEBO MINISTRIES$35,800
CENTER FOR RENEWING AMERICA$10,000
THE CHURCH$5,000
UNIVERSAL LIFE CHURCH$98
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DREAM CENTER FOUNDATION: $8k → 14%FRIENDS OF CASA HOGAR: $1k → 13%CHILDHELP: $26k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NV
WY
IN
CA
MO
AZ
TN
DC
MS
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 15 repeat orgs$359k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +66% since the first grant, against +39% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
22

Total granted

$1.8M
$220k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
+39%

Still filing today

53%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $139k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesPublic BenefitReligionPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AN
    ARIZONA NEXT LEVEL BASKETBALL FOUND
    5× · 2017–2021 · $167k · revenue +85% · 33% of their budget
  • AI
    AESOP INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $110k · revenue +66%
  • GC
    Gilbert Christian Schools Inc
    5× · 2017–2025 · $104k · revenue +100%

Funded once

  • JC
    JOY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
  • CI
    CHILDHELP INC
    one grant, 2020 · $26k · revenue -6%
  • AS
    ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Family Care Agency Inc

The mission of christian family care is to strengthen families and serve at-risk children in the name of jesus christ. the outcome of our work results in building flourishing families and communities focusing on three pillars: preserve,…

Human Services
2
Intentional Life Media

Dedicated to igniting personal transformation by affirming faith, inspiring hope, and equipping individuals, to live an intentional life in christ.

Religion
3
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
4
The Dons of Arizona
Education
5
Family Research Council

The family research council's primary exempt purpose is to reaffirm and promote nationally, and particularly in washington, dc, the traditional family unit and the judeo-christian value system upon which it is built. frc's activities in…

Human Services
6
Center of Theological Inquiry

The Center of Theological Inquiry is an independent research institution with an international visiting scholar program which convenes researchers in an ideal setting for interdisciplinary inquiries where theology casts light on global…

Religion
7
Ankerberg Theological Research Institute

The mission of the ankerberg theological research institute is to reach viewers and listeners for the gospel of christ through radio tv, and internet evangelism via the john ankerberg show.

Arts & Culture
8
Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry Inc

To glorify god by equipping the church with proper christian doctrine and to help non-believers come to a saving knowledge of jesus christ.

—
9
Institute for Christian Renewal

Fostering the christian faith

Religion
10
The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel

Enhance the ability of actec members to provide the most efficient and highest quality services to their clients; develop qualified trust and estate counselors; improve and reform probate, trust and tax laws, procedures, and standards of…

Community Improvement
11
Global Faith Network
Human Services
12
Sole Ministries

None

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is House of Refuge Inc; the most unlike its peers is Arizona Next Level Basketball Found. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MT NEBO MINISTRIES: $445,800 · OtherMT NEBO MINISTRIESREDEEMER BIBLE CHURCH: $235,600 · OtherREDEEMER BIBLE CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $129,237 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE DAVID FOSTER FOUNDATION: $90,000 · OtherTHE DAVID FOSTER FOUNDATIONVALERIE'S VICTORY FOR VETERANS INC: $72,945 · OtherVALERIE'S VICTORY FOR VETERANS INCSHEPHERD'S HOUSE BIBLE CHURCH: $55,500 · Other+21 more: $242,848 · Other+21 moreCELEBRITY FIGHT NIGHT FOUNDATION INC: $274,750 · PhilanthropyCELEBRITY FIGH…AESOP INC: $110,000 · EducationAESOP INCGilbert Christian Schools Inc: $104,082 · EducationGilbert Chris…CENTER FOR ARIZONA POLICY INC: $23,675 · EducationCENTER FOR AR…ARIZONA CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · Education+2 more: $10,450 · EducationARIZONA NEXT LEVEL BASKETBALL FOUND: $166,500 · Recreation & SportsMAN IN THE MIRROR INC: $97,500 · ReligionAWAKENED HEART MINISTRIES: $10,000 · ReligionCHILDHELP INC: $25,500 · Human ServicesDREAM CENTER FOUNDATION: $8,195 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesHOUSE OF REFUGE INC: $22,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,271,930Philanthropy$274,750Education$258,207Recreation & Sports$166,500Religion$107,500Human Services$34,695Housing & Shelter$22,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCELEBRITY FIGHT NIGHT FOUNDATION INC: $274,750 over 4y, 10% of budgetARIZONA NEXT LEVEL BASKETBALL FOUND: $166,500 over 5y, 33% of budgetAESOP INC: $110,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetGilbert Christian Schools Inc: $104,082 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMAN IN THE MIRROR INC: $97,500 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetCHILDHELP INC: $25,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR ARIZONA POLICY INC: $23,675 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetHOUSE OF REFUGE INC: $22,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAWAKENED HEART MINISTRIES: $10,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetARIZONA CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDREAM CENTER FOUNDATION: $8,195 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLARRY AND MARTHA DAY CHARITABLE TRU: $7,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetAFRICAN BIBLE COLLEGES INC: $5,450 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPHOENIX SEMINARY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUNDT FAMILY FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetFRIENDS OF CASA HOGAR: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CELEBRITY FIGHT NIGHT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA NEXT LEVEL BASKETBALL FOUND ↗
  • Who funds AESOP INC ↗
  • Who funds Gilbert Christian Schools Inc ↗
  • Who funds MAN IN THE MIRROR INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDHELP INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR ARIZONA POLICY INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF REFUGE INC ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds AWAKENED HEART MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Center for Renewing America Inc ↗
  • Who funds DREAM CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LARRY AND MARTHA DAY CHARITABLE TRU ↗
  • Who funds AFRICAN BIBLE COLLEGES INC ↗
  • Who funds PHOENIX SEMINARY INC ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds IN TOUCH MISSION INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds JUNDT FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF CASA HOGAR ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS18× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Arizona Community Foundation · Larry and Martha Day Charitable Tru · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Melchizedek Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Melchizedek Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Melchizedek Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Melchizedek Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Melchizedek’s filings →

    More from the funding graph