Skip to content

· Private foundation

Medical Education Collaborative Dba Foundation for Greater Good

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$40k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$162kHuman Services$106kYouth Development$98kEducation$78kRecreation & Sports$40kFood & Nutrition$28kInternational$18kCivil Rights$500
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JILL'S HOUSE$5,000
KIDS R FIRST$5,000
HIGH FIVES FOUNDATION$5,000
ROUNDUP RIVER RANCH$5,000
FOOD FOR NEIGHBORS$5,000
SOAR 365$5,000
CORNERSTONES$5,000
MARTHA'S TABLE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HALO FOR FREEDOM WARRIORS FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%HALO FOR FREEDOM WARRIORS FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%CORNERSTONES: $10k → 6%CORNERSTONES: $5k → 6%CORNERSTONES: $3k → 6%CORNERSTONES: $3k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
IN
CA
CO
VA
TN
NC
SC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$513k · 11 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
8

Total granted

$513k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+67%

Still filing today

82%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KR
    Kids R First
    9× · 2017–2025 · $70k · revenue +18%
  • RR
    ROUNDUP RIVER RANCH
    6× · 2019–2025 · $40k · revenue +55%
  • MT
    MARTHA'S TABLE INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $14k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • AE
    ASEA EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • EV
    EAGLE VALLEY LIBRARY DISTRICT
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDRENgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +67%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Shriners' Hospital for Children

Shriners children's is committed to compassionate, high-quality care that improves children's lives, in a family-centered and collaborative environment. (continued on schedule o)

Health
2
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
3
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
4
Shriners Hospital for Children
Philanthropy
5
Children's Hospital

Organization's mission to improve health outcomes for children; be a leader in creating innovative solutions to pediatric healthcare problems; and excel in care, advocacy, research. as the nation's children's hospital, the mission of…

Health
6
Children's Hospital Foundation

See schedule ochildren's hospital foundation dba children's national hospital foundation supports world class care and research for the nation's children. children's national hospital foundation serves as the fundraising arm for children's…

Health
7
Children's National

Children's national coordinates the overall policy and activities of the affiliated organizations. see schedule o.

Health
8
Children's Research Institute

Children's research institute dba children's national research institute conducts and promotes translational and clinical medical research and education programs that lead to improved understanding, prevention, treatment, and care of…

Health
9
Children's Flight of Hope

Children's flight of hope (cfoh) provides flights to essential, life-changing, and life-saving medical care for children in need. together with our donors, partners, and champions, we help ease the emotional and financial burden on…

Health
10
Starlight Children's Foundation

Since 1983, starlight has been delivering happiness to seriously ill children and their families.

—
11
Children's Cancer Research Fund

Children's cancer research fund fuels transformational research to bring better treatments and cures to children with cancer.

Philanthropy
12
Conquering Congenital Heart Disease

At conquering chd we exist to conquerin the most common birth defect. we engage, listen, learn, and act. we create visibility and empower all impacted by chd. we accomplish this through awareness, knowledge, community and research.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cornerstones Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Care Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CARE PROJECT: $147,500 · EducationTHE CARE PROJECTKids R First: $70,000 · EducationKids R First+1 more: $500 · EducationHIGH FIVES FOUNDATION: $97,500 · OtherHIGH FIVES FOUNDATIONJILL'S HOUSE: $70,000 · OtherJILL'S HOUSE+6 more: $13,250 · Other+6 moreROUNDUP RIVER RANCH: $40,000 · Recreation & SportsROUNDUP RIVE…GLOBAL CAMPS AFRICA INC: $18,000 · Recreation & SportsGLOBAL CAMPS…CORNERSTONES INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesHALO FOR FREEDOM WARRIOR FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Human ServicesMARTHA'S TABLE INC: $14,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD FOR NEIGHBORS: $13,500 · Food & NutritionST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,500 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $2,000 · HealthSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $1,000 · Health
Education$218,000Other$180,750Recreation & Sports$58,000Human Services$35,000Food & Nutrition$27,500Health$10,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CARE PROJECT: $147,500 over 5y, 31% of budgetKids R First: $70,000 over 9y, 12% of budgetROUNDUP RIVER RANCH: $40,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCORNERSTONES INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL CAMPS AFRICA INC: $18,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetHALO FOR FREEDOM WARRIOR FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetMARTHA'S TABLE INC: $14,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR NEIGHBORS: $13,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL VIRGINIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATIONINC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CARE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Kids R First ↗
  • Who funds ROUNDUP RIVER RANCH ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONES INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL CAMPS AFRICA INC ↗
  • Who funds HALO FOR FREEDOM WARRIOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MARTHA'S TABLE INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR NEIGHBORS ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SOAR 365 ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL VIRGINIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATIONINC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC7.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Medical Education Collaborative Dba Foundation for Greater Good funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Medical Education Collaborative Dba Foundation for Greater Good. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Medical Education Collaborative Dba Foundation for Greater Good?

Find your warmest path to Medical Education Collaborative Dba Foundation for Greater Good through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Medical Education Collaborative Dba Foundation for Greater Good’s filings →

More from the funding graph