Skip to content

· Public charity

Meals on Wheels of Durham Inc

To serve the elderly, frail, disabled, convalescing & others who can't provide proper nutrition for themselves.

$400k
Granted FY2021
32
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2021.

Human Services$470kPublic Benefit$200kFood & Nutrition$75kHealth$20kCommunity Improvement$20k
02FY2021 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k30 grants · $310k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $80k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALBEMARLE COMMISSION$80,000
Lumber River Council of Governments$20,000
Bladen Co Division of Aging$10,000
Yancey County Senior Center$10,000
County of Montgomery$10,000
Person Co Senior Center$10,000
Graham Co Senior Center$10,000
Lenoir Co Council on Aging$10,000
Meals on Wheels of Rocky Mount Inc$10,000
McDowell Senior Center$10,000
Columbus Co Dept of Aging$10,000
Jackson Co Dept on Aging$10,000
Alleghany Co Council on Aging$10,000
Swain County Senior Center$10,000
Vance County Senior Center$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $120k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 17% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 17%YVEDDI Meals on Wheels: $10k → 12%Person Co Senior Center: $10k → 14%Ashe Services for Aging: $10k → 14%Alleghany Co Council on Aging: $10k → 16%County of Montgomery: $10k → 16%Lenoir Co Council on Aging: $10k → 21%YVEDDI Meals on Wheels: $10k → 12%Person Co Senior Center: $10k → 14%Ashe Services for Aging: $10k → 14%Alleghany Co Council on Aging: $10k → 16%County of Montgomery: $10k → 16%Lenoir Co Council on Aging: $10k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$775k · 31 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +10% since the first grant, against -14% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
1

Total granted

$775k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
-14%

Still filing today

23%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21
Human ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LENOIR COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $20k · revenue +10%
  • AS
    ASHE SERVICES FOR AGING INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $20k · revenue +8%
  • RK
    REGION K COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CORPORATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $20k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • SO
    State of Franklin Health Council
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Council On Aging & Human Services

Enhancing lives and building communities by providing transportation and nutrition services.

Human Services
2
Albert Gallatin Human Service Agency Inc

Senior citizen programs through the area agency on aging which provides a center, services, congregate meals and home delivery meals.

Human Services
3
Dillon County Council On Aging

Provides senior center and congregate and home delivered meals, homemaker services allowing seniors to remain in their homes.

Human Services
4
Union County Council On Aging

To promote the mental social and physical welfare of seniors in Union County SC. To operate senior centers providing group dining home delivered meals transportation homemaker services and material support to seniors 60 and older.

Human Services
5
Newberry County Council On Aging

Provision of various services for the elderly and transportation services for the citizens of newberry county.

Human Services
6
Harrison County Council On Aging

Provide services & meals to the elderly.

Human Services
7
Kosciusko County Council On Aging and Aged Inc

To provide services and resources to the aged citizens of kosciusko county indiana and surrounding areas including transportation, mobile meals, and senior activities to improve quality of life

—
8
Jackson County Council On Aging

Provide services to local seniors to improve their quality of life and assist them in remaining in their homes

Human Services
9
Jefferson County Area Agency on Aging

Provide services to meet the needs of senior citizens of Jefferson County, Pennsylvania

—
10
Seniorage Area Agency On Aging

A federally designated Area Agency on Aging whose mission is to bring independence enhancing supportive services to the 60+ population and their caregivers in our 17 county-wide service area.

Human Services
11
Knox Co Council On Aging

To provide nutritous meals to knox county residents on-site in our lunchroom facility and via home delivery.

—
12
Greenbrier County Committee On Aging Inc

The organization operates a senior citizen's center in greenbrier county west virgnia. senior citizens are provided with transportation, nutrition, in-home care and other personal and social services.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alleghany County Council On Aging Inc; the most unlike its peers is Montgomery County Council On a Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALBEMARLE COMMISSION: $160,000 · OtherALBEMARLE COMMISSIONLumber River Development Corp: $40,000 · OtherLumber River Development Corp+23 more: $444,600 · Other+23 moreLENOIR COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesLENOIR COUNTY COU…ASHE SERVICES FOR AGING INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesASHE SERVICES FOR…REGION K COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CORPORATION: $20,000 · Human ServicesREGION K COMMUNIT…MONTGOMERY COUNTY COUNCIL ON A INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesMONTGOMERY COUNTY…YADKIN VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesYADKIN VALLEY ECO…ALLEGHANY COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesALLEGHANY COUNTY …MEALS ON WHEELS OF ROCKY MOUNT INC: $20,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$644,600Human Services$120,000Food & Nutrition$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLENOIR COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetASHE SERVICES FOR AGING INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetREGION K COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CORPORATION: $20,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetMONTGOMERY COUNTY COUNCIL ON A INC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF ROCKY MOUNT INC: $20,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetYADKIN VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALLEGHANY COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $20,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetState of Franklin Health Council: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LENOIR COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC ↗
  • Who funds ASHE SERVICES FOR AGING INC ↗
  • Who funds REGION K COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY COUNTY COUNCIL ON A INC ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF ROCKY MOUNT INC ↗
  • Who funds YADKIN VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLEGHANY COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC ↗
  • Who funds State of Franklin Health Council ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Golden Leaf IncNC39.6× affinity17 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Golden Leaf Inc · Center for Technology and Civic Life · East Carolina Health · American Kennel Club Companion Animal Recovery Corporation · The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals · Highlands Cashiers Health Foundation Inc · Nantahala Health Foundation · The Conservation Fund a Nonprofit Corporation · North Carolina Community Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Meals on Wheels of Durham Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Meals on Wheels of Durham Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Meals on Wheels of Durham Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Meals on Wheels of Durham Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Meals on Wheels of Durham’s filings →

    More from the funding graph