Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Meadows Mental Health Policy Institute for Texas

Independent and nonpartisan, the Meadows Mental Health Policy Institute works at the intersection of policy and programs to create equitable systemic changes so all people in Texas, the nation, and the world can obtain the health care they need.

$2.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$519k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 66% of MEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE FOR TEXAS’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $197k
  • $50k–250k15 grants · $1.6M
  • $250k+1 grant · $519k
$60,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$38M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UT SOUTHWESTERN MED CENTER$519,438
THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY$240,000
CITY OF GALVESTON$231,634
TEXAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCA$206,000
PRESIDENT & FELLOWS OF HARVAR$197,529
TEXAS HEALTH RESOURCES$100,000
MINARET FOUNDATION$100,000
THE GULF COAST CENTER$85,773
THE UNIV OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN$82,929
FOUNTAIN HOUSE INC$60,000
GOOD NATION FOUNDATION$60,000
Texas Network Of Youth Servic$55,297
METROCARE SERVICES$51,917
TARRANT COUNTY HOSPITAL DIST$50,000
METHODIST HEALTH SYSTEM$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $147k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 32% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MINARET FOUNDATION: $100k → 8%AMERICAN INDIANS OF TEXAS AT: $47k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.1M · 15 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
7

Total granted

$5.1M
$758k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+22%

Still filing today

27%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BH
    Baylor Health Care System Foundation
    2× · 2022–2023 · $190k · revenue +35%
  • GF
    Goodnation Foundation Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $160k · revenue +62%
  • MH
    Methodist Hospitals of Dallas
    2× · 2023–2024 · $150k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF PUERTO RICO INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $313k · revenue +73%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER HOUSTON
    one grant, 2017 · $128k
  • THE STEPHEN C ROSE LEGACY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $105k · revenue -33%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Baylor Research Institute

To improve the care and well being of our community, nationally and internationally, through innovative clinically relevant research that is consistent with the mission, vision and values of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
2
Meadows Mental Health Policy Institute for Texas

Independent and nonpartisan, the Meadows Mental Health Policy Institute works at the intersection of policy and programs to create equitable systemic changes so all people in Texas, the nation, and the world can obtain the health care they…

Health
3
HealthTexas Provider Network

To deliver the highest value patient experience through quality, safety, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness, enhanced by medical education and research in collaboration with Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
4
Memorial Hermann Health System

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
5
Baylor University Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
6
Baylor Scott & White Holdings

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
7
Scott & White Hospital-College Station

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
8
Baylor All Saints Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
9
Children's Health System of Texas

With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…

Health
10
Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Fort Worth

A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
11
Baylor Medical Center at Irving

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
12
Mhs Physicians of Texas

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Houston Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Hopelab Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
8/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTE — $1,504,129 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTECity of Galveston — $672,196 · OtherCity of GalvestonUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS — $456,974 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXASBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF PUERTO RICO INC — $312,950 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF PUERTO RICO INCLITTLE CYPRESS-MAURICEVILLE CISD — $265,625 · OtherPORT ARANSAS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT — $265,625 · OtherARANSAS PASS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT — $246,403 · OtherPORT ARTHUR ISD — $212,500 · OtherWoodsboro ISD — $190,583 · OtherVIDOR INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT — $166,750 · Other+10 more — $687,050 · Other+10 morePresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $521,124 · EducationPresident and F…THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY — $240,000 · EducationTHE HOWARD UNIV…TEXAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATION INITIATIVE — $206,000 · EducationTEXAS COMMUNITY…COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF HOUSTON INC — $41,500 · EducationThe Gulf Coast Center — $345,305 · HealthThe Gulf Coast …Baylor Health Care System Foundation — $190,000 · HealthBaylor Health C…Methodist Hospitals of Dallas — $150,000 · HealthMethodist Hospi…Texas Health Resources — $100,000 · HealthTexas Health Re…THE JED FOUNDATION — $95,300 · HealthTHE JED FOUNDAT…FOUNTAIN HOUSE INC — $60,000 · HealthFOUNTAIN HOUSE …Active Minds Inc — $50,000 · Health+1 more — $10,000 · HealthTHE STEPHEN C ROSE LEGACY FOUNDATION — $105,000 · Human ServicesBRIDGES ACROSS TEXAS INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesTexas Network of Youth Services Inc — $55,297 · Human ServicesAmerican indians in Texas at the Spanish Colonial Missions — $46,567 · Human ServicesGoodnation Foundation Inc — $160,000 · PhilanthropyGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $100,000 · Philanthropy
Other$4,980,785Education$1,008,624Health$1,000,605Human Services$306,864Philanthropy$260,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $521,124 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Gulf Coast Center — $345,305 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF PUERTO RICO INC — $312,950 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY — $240,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATION INITIATIVE — $206,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetBaylor Health Care System Foundation — $190,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGoodnation Foundation Inc — $160,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetMethodist Hospitals of Dallas — $150,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE STEPHEN C ROSE LEGACY FOUNDATION — $105,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetBRIDGES ACROSS TEXAS INC — $100,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTexas Health Resources — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JED FOUNDATION — $95,300 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFOUNTAIN HOUSE INC — $60,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTexas Network of Youth Services Inc — $55,297 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetActive Minds Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican indians in Texas at the Spanish Colonial Missions — $46,567 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHopelab Foundation Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College
  • Who funds The Gulf Coast Center
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF PUERTO RICO INC
  • Who funds THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds TEXAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATION INITIATIVE
  • Who funds Baylor Health Care System Foundation
  • Who funds Goodnation Foundation Inc
  • Who funds Methodist Hospitals of Dallas
  • Who funds THE STEPHEN C ROSE LEGACY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BRIDGES ACROSS TEXAS INC
  • Who funds GREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Texas Health Resources
  • Who funds THE JED FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FOUNTAIN HOUSE INC
  • Who funds Texas Network of Youth Services Inc
  • Who funds Active Minds Inc
  • Who funds American indians in Texas at the Spanish Colonial Missions
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF HOUSTON INC
  • Who funds Hopelab Foundation Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Antonio Food BankTX19.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Antonio Food Bank · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The George W Bush Foundation · Save The Children Federation Inc · Foundation for Inspiration & Recognition of Scienc · For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST) · P16 Plus Council of Greater Bexar County Foundation Inc · Project Lead the Way Inc · GenYOUTH Incorporated · Share Our Strength · Tides Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Meadows Mental Health Policy Institute for Texas funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph