Skip to content

· Private foundation

Me Davenport Fund a Private Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$919k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$435k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$3.2MHealth$614kHuman Services$265kFood & Nutrition$157kHousing & Shelter$113kArts & Culture$112kPhilanthropy$100kRecreation & Sports$60kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $153k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $326k
  • $250k+1 grant · $435k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DAVENPORT UNIVERSITY$435,000
COPPER SHORES COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION$168,000
FEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN$108,000
WOMEN'S CENTER$50,000
MOXIEMOMS$28,000
BEANTOWN BABY DIAPER BANK$25,000
CANTERBURY HOUSE$20,000
YMCA OF MARQUETTE COUNTY$20,000
EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF N MI$20,000
ST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$15,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MI$15,000
ST MARK'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$10,000
WESLEY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 42% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%BEANTOWN BABY DIAPER BANK: $25k → 8%BEANTOWN BABY DIAPER BANK: $5k → 8%TRILLIUM HOUSE: $17k → 11%TRILLIUM HOUSE: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 25% of Me Davenport Fund a Private Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 91% of the giving stays in MI; by stated purpose, 67%.

Me Davenport Fund a Private Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.3% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.3M · 16 repeat orgs$310k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +15% since the first grant, against -18% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
5

Total granted

$4.3M
$84k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
-18%

Still filing today

56%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $226k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DU
    DAVENPORT UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $2.8M · revenue +1%
  • VC
    VASSAR COLLEGE
    2× · 2020–2021 · $250k · revenue +43%
  • WC
    WOMEN'S CENTER INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $175k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • MA
    MARQUETTE AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue -45%
  • CL
    CARY LIBRARY
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • CT
    CEDAR TREEgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +56%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Edward W Sparrow Hospital

Improving the health of the people in our communities by providing quality, compassionate care to everyone, every time.

Health
2
The Michigan Glass Project
Public Benefit
3
Metropolitan Hospital

Metro health's mission is to improve the health and well-being of our communities. to that end the organization believes the foundation of good health is based on excellent quality primary care. the organization is anchored by a 208-bed,…

Health
4
Up Health Education Corporation

The msu chm upper peninsula education corporation is a collaborative medical education corporation funded by the michigan state university college of human medicine and up health system marquette, dedicated to the medical education of…

Education
5
Coalition to Protect Michigan Resources

The coalition to protect michigan resources's mission is to be a strong voice for the equitable co-management of michigan's fisheries, with both the great lakes and inland lakes and streams, to insure that conservation principles remain in…

Environment
6
Traverse Bay Childrens Advocacy Center

The traverse bay children's advocacy is built upon a model of success used by children's advocacy centers nationwide, and customized through collaborative team input in our region. our mission speaks to protecting children by providing…

—
7
Marquette Maritime Museum

To preserve and promote maritime history

Arts & Culture
8
Michigan Center of Accountability for Republicans

Social welfare and issue advocacy

Civil Rights
9
Michigan Psychiatric Society

Mission is to represent the interests and professional needs of psychiatric physicians in michigan while striving to ensure quality care for people with mental disorders and their families through promotion of education, research and…

—
10
Holland Community Hospital

To continuously improve the health of the communities we serve in the spirit of hope, compassion, respect and dignity.

Health
11
Mercy Health Partners

We, mercy health and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.mercy health partners is a member of mercy health and trinity health.

—
12
Community Pride Mi
Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Superior Health Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Moxiemoms. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DAVENPORT UNIVERSITY: $2,846,358 · EducationDAVENPORT UNIVERSITYVASSAR COLLEGE: $250,000 · OtherVASSAR COLLEGEPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MI: $242,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MIWOMEN'S CENTER INC: $175,000 · OtherWOMEN'S CENTER INCFEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN: $148,000 · OtherFEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGANEPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF N MI: $85,000 · OtherEPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF N MICANTERBURY HOUSE: $60,000 · OtherNORTHERN LIGHTS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $50,000 · OtherMARQUETTE AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherYMCA OF MARQUETTE COUNTY: $40,000 · Other+7 more: $99,900 · Other+7 moreCOPPER SHORES COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $168,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $85,000 · HealthSUPERIOR HEALTH FOUNDATION: $69,500 · HealthMOXIEMOMS: $28,000 · HealthROOM AT THE INN: $112,500 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MARQUETTE COUNTY: $100,000 · PhilanthropyBEANTOWN BABY DIAPER BANK: $30,000 · Human ServicesTRILLIUM HOUSE INC: $21,668 · Human ServicesCEDAR TREE: $10,000 · Crime & LegalSUPERIOR ARTS YOUTH THEATER: $5,500 · Arts & Culture
Education$2,846,358Other$1,199,900Health$350,500Housing & Shelter$112,500Philanthropy$100,000Human Services$51,668Crime & Legal$10,000Arts & Culture$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDAVENPORT UNIVERSITY: $2,846,358 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetVASSAR COLLEGE: $250,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN'S CENTER INC: $175,000 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN: $148,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetROOM AT THE INN: $112,500 over 4y, 11% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MARQUETTE COUNTY: $100,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $85,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSUPERIOR HEALTH FOUNDATION: $69,500 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetMARQUETTE AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetBEANTOWN BABY DIAPER BANK: $30,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetMOXIEMOMS: $28,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetTRILLIUM HOUSE INC: $21,668 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetCEDAR TREE: $10,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetSUPERIOR ARTS YOUTH THEATER: $5,500 over 1y, 3.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DAVENPORT UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds VASSAR COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds COPPER SHORES COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds ROOM AT THE INN ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MARQUETTE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
  • Who funds SUPERIOR HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MARQUETTE AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BEANTOWN BABY DIAPER BANK ↗
  • Who funds MOXIEMOMS ↗
  • Who funds TRILLIUM HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds CEDAR TREE ↗
  • Who funds SUPERIOR ARTS YOUTH THEATER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

West End Health FoundationMI20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: West End Health Foundation · Phyllis & Max Reynolds Foundation · Incrediblebank Foundation Inc · Tourville Foundation · Frazier Fund Inc · Community Foundation of Marquette County · Superior Health Foundation · The Cleveland-Cliffs Foundation · Flagstar Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Me Davenport Fund a Private Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Me Davenport Fund a Private Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Me Davenport Fund a Private’s filings →

More from the funding graph