Skip to content

· Private foundation

McSwigan Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$250k
Granted FY2017
14
Grants FY2017
1
States reached
$30k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of McSwigan Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to The Pittsburgh Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2017, the last year McSwigan Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $250k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

6
’17
0
’18
0
’19
0
’20
0
’21
1
’22
0
’23
1
’24
0
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$3.5MArts & Culture$93kEducation$30kHuman Services$15kEmployment$15kFood & Nutrition$8kAnimals$1kOther$0
02FY2017 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 14 grants below total $145,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $250,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $105,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under $10k6 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $110k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PGH HISTORY & LANDMARKS FOUNDATION$30,000
CENTER FOR THEATER ARTS$15,000
READING IS FUNDAMENTAL$15,000
CARNEGIE LIBRARY OF PITTSBURGH$10,000
GEMINI THEATER COMPANY$10,000
CITY MUSIC CTR OF DUQUESNE UNIV$10,000
PGH CENTER FOR CREATIVE REUSE$10,000
WOMEN'S CENTER & SHELTER GTR PGH$10,000
CENTER FOR THEATER ARTS$8,500
GREATER PGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$7,500
PGH HISTORY & LANDMARKS FOUNDATION$5,000
WOMEN'S CENTER & SHELTER GTR PGH$5,000
READING IS FUNDAMENTAL$5,000
ASSEMBLE, INC$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MANCHESTER BIDWELL CORPORATION: $15k → 11%NATIONAL AVIARY PITTSBURGH: $1k → 11%THE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $527k → 11%THE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $375k → 11%THE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $325k → 11%THE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $230k → 11%THE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $180k → 11%THE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $175k → 11%THE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $175k → 11%THE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $175k → 11%THE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $170k → 11%THE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $170k → 11%THE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $125k → 11%THE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $125k → 11%THE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $100k → 11%THE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $100k → 11%THE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $100k → 11%THE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $100k → 11%THE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $68k → 11%THE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $68k → 11%THE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%THE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%THE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%THE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%THE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $18k → 11%THE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%THE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $667 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pittsburgh Ballet Theatre Inc

See schedule o for the description of pittsburgh ballet theatre inc.'s primary mission.the ballet is pittsburgh's source and ambassador for extraordinary ballet experiences that give life to the classical tradition, nurture new ideas and,…

Arts & Culture
2
Pittsburgh Arts & Lectures Inc

The mission of pittsburgh arts & lectures is to connect celebrated authors with the community, elevate civic discourse, and inspire creativity and a passion for the literary arts. our commitment to knowledge, learning, integrity, and…

Arts & Culture
3
Children's Museum of Pittsburgh

The museum's mission is to provide innovative and inclusive museum experiences that inspire kindness, joy, creativity and curiosity for all learners.

Arts & Culture
4
Pittsburgh Public Theater Corporation

The mission of pittsburgh public theater is to provide artistically diverse theatrical experiences of the highest quality. pittsburgh public theater also strives to serve, challenge, stimulate, and (continued on schedule o)

Arts & Culture
5
The Friends of the Pittsburgh Institutions
—
6
Pittsburgh Glass Center Inc

Glass art: we teach it. we create it. we promote it. we support those who make it. pittsburgh glass center (pgc) cultivates an inclusive and welcoming environment that encourages everyone, from the casually curious to the master artist, to…

Arts & Culture
7
Balletx

Balletx expands the vocabulary of contemporary ballet for all audiences through innovative performances, world premiere choreography, dance education, and community programs.

Arts & Culture
8
Carnegie Institute

To preserve and expand the resources of art and science as agents of personal growth and social advancement in pittsburgh and beyond.

Arts & Culture
9
Pittsburgh Cultural Trust

Presenting diverse, quality performing & visual art; managing arts facilities; advancing arts education; and creating & developing pittsburgh's cultural district as a destination for entertainment, business, and urban living, thus…

Arts & Culture
10
Artphilly

The mission of artphilly is to amplify philadelphia's arts and culture by commissioning, presenting, producing, and promoting art of all kinds for local audiences and the world. its vision is to spotlight(continued on schedule o)the city…

Arts & Culture
11
Greater Pittsburgh Arts Council

By sharing resources and fostering meaningful relationships that strengthen the region's creative community, the greater pittsburgh arts council builds a more resourced, connected, and informed arts sector, empowering artists and arts…

Arts & Culture
12
Barebones Productions Inc

Barebones productions is a pittsburgh theater company whose mission is to facilitate the growth of local theater artists through the production of challenging, entertaining, thought-provoking plays and to attract new, young audiences by…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Pittsburgh Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Assemble Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $3,479,047 · PhilanthropyTHE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATIONPGH HISTORY & LANDMARKS FOUNDATION: $35,000 · OtherWOMEN'S CENTER & SHELTER GTR PGH: $15,000 · OtherPGH CENTER FOR CREATIVE REUSE: $10,000 · OtherCITY MUSIC CTR OF DUQUESNE UNIV: $10,000 · OtherTHE CENTER FOR THEATER ARTS: $23,500 · Arts & CultureGEMINI THEATER COMPANY: $10,000 · Arts & CultureAssemble Inc: $4,000 · Arts & CultureREADING IS FUNDAMENTAL PITTSBURGH: $20,000 · EducationCARNEGIE LIBRARY OF PITTSBURGH: $10,000 · EducationMANCHESTER BIDWELL CORPORATION: $15,000 · Public BenefitGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $7,500 · Food & NutritionNATIONAL AVIARY IN PITTSBURGH INC: $1,000 · Animals
Philanthropy$3,479,047Other$70,000Arts & Culture$37,500Education$30,000Public Benefit$15,000Food & Nutrition$7,500Animals$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $3,479,047 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR THEATER ARTS: $23,500 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetREADING IS FUNDAMENTAL PITTSBURGH: $20,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetMANCHESTER BIDWELL CORPORATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCARNEGIE LIBRARY OF PITTSBURGH: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEMINI THEATER COMPANY: $10,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAssemble Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetNATIONAL AVIARY IN PITTSBURGH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh FoundationPA15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · Wi Patterson Charitable Fund · American Eagle Outfitters Foundation · Eqt Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization McSwigan Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from McSwigan Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on McSwigan Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph