· Private foundation
McKeen Fund
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k40 grants · $177k
- $10k–50k20 grants · $240k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER | $25,000 |
| NEW YORK AND PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL | $25,000 |
| THE VISCARDI CENTER | $20,000 |
| SAN MIQUEL ACADEMY | $10,000 |
| SENIOR RESOURCE CENTER | $10,000 |
| FAIRFIELD UNIVERSITY | $10,000 |
| STUDENT SPONSOR PARTNERSHIP | $10,000 |
| BETHANY HOUSE | $10,000 |
| LEGAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN | $10,000 |
| CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| COLGATE UNIVERSITY | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| LOURDES FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| THE HARRY THOMSON CENTER | $10,000 |
| COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $569k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 42% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
78 repeat relationships — 53 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TVTHE VISCARDI CENTER INC6× · 2020–2025 · $200k · revenue +43%
- TNThe New York and Presbyterian Hospital5× · 2020–2025 · $125k · revenue +59%
- HCHOUR CHILDREN INC6× · 2020–2025 · $80k · revenue +5%
Funded once
- DCDISCALCED CARMELITE NUNSone grant, 2020 · $40k
- BCBLOOD CANCER UNITED INCone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -25%
- ICINCARNATION CHILDREN'S CENTERone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -99%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
We, st. joseph's medical and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. st. joseph's medical is a member of st. joseph's health and trinity health.
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christs healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
The goals and objectives of the corporation are as follows:(a) to operate and maintain a nonsectarian, general hospital at one or more locations for the furnishing of inpatient, ambulatory, restorative, preventative and emergency medical…
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy Home for Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Vero Beach Opera Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
70 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 70 of the 115 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE VISCARDI CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds The New York and Presbyterian Hospital ↗
- Who funds HOUR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds BETHANY HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds THE JOHN'S ISLAND FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COLGATE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds Mercy Center Inc ↗
- Who funds COMPREHENSIVE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds Helen Keller Services ↗
- Who funds NOTRE DAME OF MARYLAND UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds THE HOPE FOR FAMILIES CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds INDIAN RIVER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE INTERFAITH NUTRITION NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds BROOKLYN JESUIT PREP ↗
- Who funds The Thomas M Brennan Memorial Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds LOURDES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SPECTRUM YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds WHOLE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ST PATRICK'S MANOR INC ↗
- Who funds SAFESPACE INC ↗
- Who funds NY POLICE AND FIRE WIDOWS' & CHILDREN'S BENEFIT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Mercy Haven Inc ↗
- Who funds THE OPEN DOOR CAPE ANN FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds The Safe Center LI Inc ↗
- Who funds REACH BEYOND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The New York Community Trust · Indian River Community Foundation Inc · Td Charitable Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Frank J Antun Foundation · Pseg Foundation Inc · Long Island Real Estate Group Inc · Riley Family Foundation · Rita and Frank Castagna Family Foundation Inc · Thomas E Sullivan and Barbara a Sullivan Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization McKeen Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Reach Beyond Domestic Violence Inc — 53% of income from government
- Bridge Over Troubled Waters Inc — 32% of income from government
- Safespace Inc — 25% of income from government
- St Patrick's Manor Inc — 16% of income from government
- Vermont Adaptive Ski and Sports — 11% of income from government
- Domestic Violence Crisis Center — 10% of income from government
- Notre Dame of Maryland University Inc — 9% of income from government
- Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program Inc — 8% of income from government
- Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
- Fairfield University — 1% of income from government
- The Learning Alliance Inc — 0% of income from government
- Whole Family Health Center Inc — 0% of income from government
- Intensive Therapeutics Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to McKeen Fund?
Find your warmest path to McKeen Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.