· Private foundation
B Corry and Donna J McFarland Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $1k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
- $50k–250k13 grants · $1.5M
- $250k+6 grants · $1.9M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MYRIAD USA | $536,000 |
| AMERICA'S AUTOMOTIVE TRUST | $377,080 |
| ROOT CAPITAL | $250,000 |
| THE TACOMA RESCUE MISSION | $250,000 |
| THE WOMENS BAKERY | $250,000 |
| UNLOCKING COMMUNITIES | $250,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $190,000 |
| CHIEF SEATTLE CLUB | $150,000 |
| GARY SINISE FOUNDATION | $150,000 |
| PET LOS CABOS | $150,000 |
| FARESTART | $150,000 |
| THE NEW AFRICA FUND | $100,000 |
| VILLAGE ENTERPRISES | $100,000 |
| CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES | $100,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $100,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $200k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
22 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AAAMERICAS AUTOMOTIVE TRUST8× · 2018–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +35%
- TRTHE RESCUE MISSION9× · 2017–2025 · $760k · revenue +159%
- LCLEMAY-AMERICAS CAR MUSEUM3× · 2017–2020 · $300k · revenue +5%
Funded once
- UWUNITED WAY OF THE WINE COUNTRYone grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue -54%
COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INCone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -6%- FWFOSS WATERWAY SEAPORTgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +66%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.
Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.
Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…
Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.
World coffee research unites the global coffee industry to drive science-based agricultural solutions to urgently secure a diverse and sustainable supply of quality coffee today and for generations to come. our mission is to grow, protect,…
To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.
Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…
A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is Pet Los Cabos. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MAVUNO ↗
- Who funds AMERICAS AUTOMOTIVE TRUST ↗
- Who funds MYRIAD USA INC ↗
- Who funds THE RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds THE WOMEN'S BAKERY INC ↗
- Who funds LEMAY-AMERICAS CAR MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds Unlocking Communities Inc ↗
- Who funds ROOT CAPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds FARESTART ↗
- Who funds Claremont McKenna College ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds PET LOS CABOS ↗
- Who funds CHIEF SEATTLE CLUB ↗
- Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds NEW AFRICA FUND INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER TACOMA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MULTICARE FOUNDATIONS ↗
- Who funds HANDS FOR PEACEMAKING FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Maris Place ↗
- Who funds STEP BY STEP FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER ↗
- Who funds One Days Wages ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE WINE COUNTRY ↗
- Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
- Who funds FOSS WATERWAY SEAPORT ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds The Festival at Sandpoint Inc ↗
- Who funds KBTC ASSOCIATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Dimmer Family Foundation · Greater Tacoma Community Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Gary E Milgard Family Foundation- Sunshine · Fuchsg & M Fdn Tai · The Bamford Foundation · Names Family Foundation · The Russell Family Foundation · Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization B Corry and Donna J McFarland Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Root Capital Inc — 9% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.