· Public charity
Gateway Wellness Foundation
To improve the health and well-being of all people and communities within all counties of western north carolina.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 54 grants below total $844,036 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $990,372 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $146,336 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k19 grants · $131k
- $10k–50k30 grants · $438k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $275k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DHT POLK COUNTY LTRG | $75,000 |
| POLK COUNTY SCHOOLS | $50,000 |
| BURKE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS | $50,000 |
| RUTHERFORD COUNTY SCHOOLS | $50,000 |
| MCDOWELL COUNTY SCHOOLS | $50,000 |
| GOOD SAMARTIAN CLINIC INC | $30,000 |
| THOMAS JEFFERSON CLASSICAL ACADEMY | $24,900 |
| BRIGHTER HOUSE | $20,000 |
| BURKE COUNTY UNITED WAY | $20,000 |
| RUTHERFORD COUNTY SCHOOLS | $18,000 |
| RUTHERFORD COUNTY SENIOR CENTER | $18,000 |
| BURKE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS | $15,800 |
| BURKE COUNTY SENOIR CENTER | $15,800 |
| NEW DIMENSION SCHOOL | $15,000 |
| FREEDOM LIFE | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $282k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
48 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $241k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CICAREREACH INC4× · 2021–2025 · $409k · revenue +28% · 59% of their budget
- MLMCDOWELL LFAC3× · 2020–2025 · $205k · revenue +527% · 28% of their budget
- RHRUTHERFORD HOUSING PARTNERSHIP INC6× · 2020–2025 · $122k · revenue +259%
Funded once
- EPE POLK INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +68%
- SLSt Lukes Hospitalone grant, 2021 · $42k · revenue -1%
- WPWESTERN PIEDMONT COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTSone grant, 2023 · $40k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Carolina Family Health Centers, Inc. provides accessible and affordable health care with excellence...where patients come FIRST
To promote community based primary health care systems in medically underserved areas.
To provide affordable housing for low-income individuals living in buncombe county and the surrounding areas of north carolina.
Providing primary health care and professional counseling services to all indviduals who need it.
Providing healthcare to the underserved population of Harnett County NC and the surrounding area.
Provider of comprehensive, compassionate, high quality primary medical, dental, pharmacy and behavioral health services in southeastern north carolina.
The mission of hospice & community care is to give hope, comfort, and compassion to those that need it most. hospice & community care is a nonprofit healthcare organization providing hospice and palliative care to residents of york,…
To help all union county nc residents gain access to affordable housing, decent jobs, and to develop a sense of security.
To provide primary health care for limited income persons residing in cumberland county, nc and surrounding areas who are without adequate health insurance benefits
WNC Health Network, Inc supports people and organizations to improve community health and wellbeing across Western North Carolina.
The clinic provides primary healthcare in a spirit of compassion to limited income persons who are without adequate health insurance benefits in warren and vance counties, north carolina.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Western North Carolina Community Health Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Loving Hearts for Christ Bear Closet. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
76 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 76 of the 116 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ANC MCDOWELL HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds CAREREACH INC ↗
- Who funds CARENET COUNSELING OF MARION ↗
- Who funds MCDOWELL LFAC ↗
- Who funds RUTHERFORD HOUSING PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds ANC MISSION MEDICAL ASSOCIATES INC ↗
- Who funds Centro Unido Latino Americano ↗
- Who funds CROSSNORE COMMUNITIES FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds THERMAL BELT OUTREACH MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds Freedom Life Ministries ↗
- Who funds BURKE UNITED CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds BLUE RIDGE HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds RUTHERFORD COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds HIGHER ACADEMIA CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Classical Academies CFA Inc ↗
- Who funds BURKE COUNTY UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds E POLK INC ↗
- Who funds WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds STEPS TO HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds St Lukes Hospital ↗
- Who funds THE HOUSING ASSISTANCE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds WESTERN PIEDMONT COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS ↗
- Who funds Mosaic Hope ↗
- Who funds Rutherford County Schools Education Foundation ↗
- Who funds Yokefellow Service Center ↗
- Who funds ANC HEALTHCARE INC ↗
- Who funds Thomas Jefferson Classical Academy ↗
- Who funds BURKE PSYCHOSOCIAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds THE MEETING PLACE ONE INC ↗
- Who funds The New Dimensions School Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc · Dogwood Health Trust · Wnc Bridge Foundation · Carolina Foothills Foundation · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Rhi Legacy Foundation Inc · Rostan Family Foundation · Manna Food Bank Inc · The Golden Leaf Inc · Community Foundation of Burke County · Polk County Community Foundation Inc · Co Ta Huffman-Cornwell Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Gateway Wellness Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.