· Private foundation
McDonald Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Community Care Council | $2,000 |
| Street Charity | $2,000 |
| LEAP Global Missions | $2,000 |
| Saylers Light | $2,000 |
| Lookout Mt Church Ministries | $2,000 |
| PTSD Foundation of America | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| Southern Hills Christian Church Ministries | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +40% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LGLEAP GLOBAL MISSIONS5× · 2021–2025 · $6k · revenue +67%
- CCCOMMUNITY CARE COUNCIL INC5× · 2021–2025 · $6k · revenue +48%
- SLSAYLORS LIGHT INCORPORATED3× · 2023–2025 · $4k · revenue +53%
Funded once
- FHFarmers Hunters Feeding t Hungrone grant, 2022 · $1k
- HFHUNTING FOR THE CURE INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +325%
- EYENGAGE YOUR DESTINYgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +40%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of Praying Through ministries is to deliver gospel hope to families navigating dark seasons of pregnancy, childhood illness, hospitalization, and/or child loss (miscarriage, stillbirth, infant loss, and child loss of any age)…
Hunter's hope ministry's mission is to share the gospel and hope of jesus christ with families who have suffered the loss of a child through miscarriage or stillbirth through support, prayer, education, and distribution of care packages.
The mission of color green ministries is: to tell the world jesus loves them through art, movies and ministry.
Religious- Sharing the Gospel and the love of Christ with others.
Shining christ's light of hope in a broken and hurting world. hope ministries is a nonprofit christian family that cares for orphans, provides medical care and supplies, provided educational and spiritual support, and brings faith, hope…
Religious Purposes
To transmit the gospel of chirst to african countries and to promote awareness of that need amoung americans.
Our mission is to make disciples of chrsit through outdoor ministry., we provide outdoor camps for youth ages 8-18 as wells as international mission trips. through these camps, the organization teaches youth god's design for wildlife…
Create faith-filled environment for chil
Creative Word Ministries, Inc. provides Ministry to individuals by sharing Gods Creative Word of hope and restoration. This ministry is provided through seminars, retreats, individual counseling, books and tapes.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Leap Global Missions and the most unlike its peers is The Well Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LEAP GLOBAL MISSIONS ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CARE COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds SAYLORS LIGHT INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN PASTORS TRAINING ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds BRAXTON DOLLAR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HUNTING FOR THE CURE INC ↗
- Who funds ENGAGE YOUR DESTINY ↗
- Who funds A Child's Hope International ↗
- Who funds THE WELL CORP ↗
- Who funds 30-30 MINISTRIES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization McDonald Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.