Skip to content
MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger

Inspired by Jewish values and ideals, MAZON is a national advocacy organization working to end hunger among people of all faiths and backgrounds in the United States and Israel.

$4.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
51
Grants FY2025still arriving
25
States reached
$160k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$21MCrime & Legal$1.5MInternational$430kPublic Benefit$170kCommunity Improvement$78kCivil Rights$64kHuman Services$9k
02FY2025 · 51 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 51 grants below total $3,889,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $4,261,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $372,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $160k
  • $50k–250k44 grants · $3.7M
$80,000
Median grant
25
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PEF Israel Endowment Funds$160,000
Center for a New Economy Inc$150,000
Instituto del Desarrollo$140,000
Hawaii Appleseed Ctr for Law$105,000
Kentucky Center for Economic$95,000
Alaska Food Policy Council$95,000
Hawaii Public Health Institu$95,000
Feeding Alabama$95,000
Hawaii Childrens Action Netw$90,000
Hawaii Foodbank Inc$90,000
Hunger Free Oklahoma$90,000
Mississippi Cntr for Justice$90,000
AR Advocates Children & Famil$90,000
Florida Impact Inc$90,000
William E Morris Institute$90,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $2.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 70% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%IDAHO HUNGER RELIEF TASK FORCE: $20k → 8%Impact Cubed: $35k → 11%AR Advocates Children & Famil: $90k → 17%Michigan League for Public Policy: $10k → 9%Kansas Action for Children: $90k → 14%EMPOWER MISSOURI: $20k → 10%MISSOURI BUDGET PROJECT: $83k → 21%Jewish Family Service: $10k → 9%Center for Food Action in New Jersey Inc: $10k → 7%Preble Street: $72k → 7%Impact Cubed: $30k → 11%FOCUS Churches of Albany Inc: $14k → 14%Kansas Action for Children: $75k → 14%Empower Missouri: $16k → 10%Missouri Budget Project: $80k → 21%Voices for Georgias Children: $80k → 13%New American Pathways Inc: $10k → 14%PREBLE STREET: $60k → 7%Kansas Action for Children: $75k → 14%Empower Missouri: $14k → 10%THE MISSOURI BUDGET PROJECT: $75k → 21%PREBLE STREET: $60k → 7%AR Advocates Children & Famil: $75k → 17%Kansas Action for Children: $65k → 14%Missouri Budget Project: $50k → 21%Voices for Georgias Children: $75k → 13%Children's Alliance: $20k → 9%Preble Street: $50k → 7%Hawaii Appleseed Ctr for Law: $110k → 9%AR Advocates Children & Famil: $75k → 17%Kansas Action for Children: $65k → 14%Voices for Georgias Children: $65k → 13%Preble Street: $10k → 7%Hawaii Appleseed Ctr for Law: $105k → 9%AR Advocates Children & Famil: $65k → 17%KANSAS ACTION FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 14%Voices for Georgias Children: $65k → 13%AR Advocates Children & Famil: $65k → 17%AR Advocates Children & Famil: $60k → 17%Feeding Indianas Hungry: $75k → 16%ARKANSAS ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $60k → 17%Feeding Indianas Hungry: $45k → 16%Feeding Indianas Hungry: $45k → 16%Hawaii Appleseed Ctr for Law: $90k → 9%Feeding Indianas Hungry: $45k → 16%Feeding Indianas Hungry: $45k → 16%Feeding Indiana's Hungry: $10k → 16%Hawaii Appleseed Ctr for Law: $90k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

MAZON A Jewish Response to Hungerlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.5% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$21M · 85 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

85 repeat relationships: 43 still active in FY2025, 42 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

85
91

Total granted

$21M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+71%

Still filing today

96%
92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $169k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesCrime & LegalPublic BenefitEducationCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WE
    WILLIAM E MORRIS INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $555k · revenue +27%
  • TJ
    TENNESSEE JUSTICE CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $500k · revenue +98%
  • AA
    ARKANSAS ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
    7× · 2019–2025 · $490k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • CF
    Center for Pan Asian Community Services
    one grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue -64%
  • AS
    American Supporters of Yedid Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $35k · revenue -62%
  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST TNgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $30k · revenue +70%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
2
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
3
Montana Food Bank Network Inc

Our mission: to end hunger in montana through food acquisition and distribution, education, and advocacy. we are the only statewide hunger organization, providing emergency food and increasing food access among needy children, seniors and…

Food & Nutrition
4
The Food Bank of Northeast Arkansas

The food bank of northeast arkansas provides hunger relief to people in need in twelve counties in northeast arkansas by raising awareness, securing resources, and distributing food through a network of non-profit agencies and programs.

Human Services
5
Food Bank Association of New York State

The mission of feeding new york state is to lead a unified effort for a hunger-free state of new york. the mission of food banking is to obtain food and deliver it to emergency food programs. feeding new york state works to end hunger by…

Food & Nutrition
6
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
7
Harvesters - the Community Food Network

Harvesters mobilizes the power of our community to create equitable access to nutritious food and address the root causes and impact of hunger.

Food & Nutrition
8
Community Food Bank of New Jersey Inc

We serve as a champion for addressing the root causes of hunger, delivering neighbor-centric solutions, and fostering collaborative partnerships across all sectors of society for New Jersey.

Food & Nutrition
9
Feeding Illinois

Feeding illinois is a coalition of eight feeding america food banks that provide food to over 2,400 food pantries, soup kitchens, and shelters that feed nearly 1.4 million residents across the entire state of illinois.

Food & Nutrition
10
Food Bank of Eastern Michigan

The Food Bank of Eastern Michigan's mission is to be the Food Source for people in need. Partnering with organizations to feed the hungry, we advocate and build a community solution to a community problem. By leveraging an abundance of…

Food & Nutrition
11
Hunger Action Los Angeles Inc

Hunger action los angeles ends hunger and promotes healthy eating through advocacy, education, and appropriate direct service. the chief program area currently is the market match prgram operated by hala at 22 farmers markets in la county…

Education
12
Fair Food Network Inc

Fair food network is organized to grow community health, wealth, and resilience through food, to increase access to affordable healthy food, help local food economies thrive and build resilience in local food and agriculture systems.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Open Door Cape Ann Food Pantry Inc; the most unlike its peers is Acomerpr Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

178 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 178 of the 186 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
43
Early backer (in before they grew)
174/178
Grantees still filing
141/178
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ARKANSAS HUNGER RELIEF ALLIANCE INC: $427,000 · Food & NutritionARKANSAS HUNGER RELIEF …INDY HUNGER NETWORK INC: $424,000 · Food & NutritionINDY HUNGER NETWORK INCFEEDING ALABAMA: $385,500 · Food & NutritionFEEDING ALABAMAHAWAII FOODBANK INC: $382,000 · Food & NutritionHAWAII FOODBANK INCAlaska Food Policy Council: $372,560 · Food & NutritionAlaska Food Policy Coun…FEEDING KENTUCKY INC: $339,500 · Food & NutritionFEEDING KENTUCKY INCRegional Food Bank of Northeast Florida Inc: $305,000 · Food & NutritionRegional Food Bank of N…REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $289,000 · Food & NutritionREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF O…HUNGER FREE OKLAHOMA INC: $260,000 · Food & NutritionFEEDING LOUISIANA: $236,500 · Food & NutritionGood Shepherd Food Bank: $235,000 · Food & NutritionOPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC: $215,000 · Food & Nutrition+46 more: $1,028,685 · Food & Nutrition+46 moreWILLIAM E MORRIS INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $555,000 · Crime & LegalWILLIAM E MORRI…TENNESSEE JUSTICE CENTER INC: $500,000 · Crime & LegalTENNESSEE JUSTI…NEBRASKA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST: $441,500 · Crime & LegalNEBRASKA APPLES…Kansas Appleseed Center for Law and Justice Inc: $414,000 · Crime & LegalKansas Applesee…OFFICE OF KENTUCKY LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAMS INC: $411,524 · Crime & LegalOFFICE OF KENTU…MISSISSIPPI CENTER FOR JUSTICE: $394,000 · Crime & LegalMISSISSIPPI CEN…INDIANA JUSTICE PROJECT INC: $255,000 · Crime & LegalINDIANA JUSTICE…+10 more: $292,000 · Crime & Legal+10 moreUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE: $579,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVIL…CHILDRENS ACTION ALLIANCE INC: $525,000 · OtherCHILDRENS ACTION ALLIANCE INCCENTER FOR RURAL AFFAIRS: $316,000 · OtherPOVERTY SOLUTIONS GROUP INC: $310,000 · OtherINSTITUTO DEL DESARROLLO DE LA JUVENTUD: $240,000 · OtherFLORIDA IMPACT INC: $418,000 · OtherFLORIDA IMPACT INCOKLAHOMA POLICY INC: $411,900 · OtherOKLAHOMA POLICY INCNC BUDGET & TAX CENTER: $240,000 · OtherCENTER FOR A NEW ECONOMY INC: $370,000 · OtherHAWAII CHILDREN'S ACTION NETWORK: $370,000 · OtherWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION: $235,000 · OtherNEW ISRAEL FUND: $690,000 · OtherNEW ISRAEL FUNDTHE AFN EDUCATION FUND: $310,000 · Other+54 more: $1,971,877 · Other+54 moreARKANSAS ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $490,000 · Human ServicesARKANSAS ADVO…HAWAII APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW AND ECONOMIC JUSTICE: $395,000 · Human ServicesHAWAII APPLES…KANSAS ACTION FOR CHILDREN INC: $387,000 · Human ServicesKANSAS ACTION…NORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE CENTER: $292,500 · Human ServicesNORTH CAROLIN…MISSOURI BUDGET PROJECT: $288,000 · Human ServicesMISSOURI BUDG…VOICES FOR GEORGIA'S CHILDREN INC: $285,000 · Human ServicesVOICES FOR GE…Feeding Indiana's Hungry Inc: $265,000 · Human ServicesFeeding India…PREBLE STREET: $252,000 · Human ServicesPREBLE STREET+12 more: $231,000 · Human Services+12 moreALABAMA ARISE: $458,460 · Public BenefitALABAMA ARI…OPENSKY POLICY INSTITUTE: $444,000 · Public BenefitOPENSKY POL…INVEST IN LOUISIANA: $326,000 · Public BenefitINVEST IN L…ESPACIOS ABIERTOS PUERTO RICO INC: $285,000 · Public BenefitESPACIOS AB…FLORIDA POLICY INSTITUTE INC: $255,000 · Public BenefitFLORIDA POL…WEST VIRGINIA CENTER ON BUDGET AND POLICY INC: $223,000 · Public BenefitWEST VIRGIN…GEORGIA BUDGET AND POLICY INSTITUTE INC: $215,000 · Public BenefitGEORGIA BUD…KENTUCKY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC POLICY INC: $185,000 · Public BenefitKENTUCKY CE…+3 more: $65,000 · Public BenefitPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $585,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $308,000 · PhilanthropyMOMSRISING EDUCATION FUND: $280,000 · PhilanthropyLatino Community Fund Inc: $255,000 · PhilanthropyTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $144,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $35,000 · PhilanthropyHAWAII PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE: $375,000 · HealthALASKA NATIVE TRIBAL HEALTH CONSORTIUM: $310,000 · HealthNORTH CAROLINA ALLIANCE FOR HEALTH: $280,000 · HealthTHE PARTNERSHIP FOR A HEALTHY MISSISSIPPI INC: $235,000 · HealthWEST VIRGINIA HEALTHY KIDS AND FAMILIES COALITION: $215,000 · Health+1 more: $20,000 · Health
Food & Nutrition$4,899,745Crime & Legal$3,263,024Other$6,987,277Human Services$2,885,500Public Benefit$2,456,460Philanthropy$1,607,000Health$1,435,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND: $690,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $585,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWILLIAM E MORRIS INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $555,000 over 7y, 23% of budgetCHILDRENS ACTION ALLIANCE INC: $525,000 over 7y, 3.9% of budgetTENNESSEE JUSTICE CENTER INC: $500,000 over 8y, 3.7% of budgetARKANSAS ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $490,000 over 7y, 4.5% of budgetALABAMA ARISE: $458,460 over 6y, 6.4% of budgetOPENSKY POLICY INSTITUTE: $444,000 over 6y, 6.2% of budgetNEBRASKA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST: $441,500 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetARKANSAS HUNGER RELIEF ALLIANCE INC: $427,000 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetINDY HUNGER NETWORK INC: $424,000 over 6y, 9.4% of budgetFLORIDA IMPACT INC: $418,000 over 6y, 42% of budgetKansas Appleseed Center for Law and Justice Inc: $414,000 over 8y, 10% of budgetOKLAHOMA POLICY INC: $411,900 over 7y, 4.2% of budgetOFFICE OF KENTUCKY LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAMS INC: $411,524 over 6y, 7.7% of budgetHAWAII APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW AND ECONOMIC JUSTICE: $395,000 over 4y, 6.9% of budgetMISSISSIPPI CENTER FOR JUSTICE: $394,000 over 6y, 3.7% of budgetKANSAS ACTION FOR CHILDREN INC: $387,000 over 7y, 7.2% of budgetFEEDING ALABAMA: $385,500 over 6y, 16% of budgetHAWAII FOODBANK INC: $382,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetHAWAII PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE: $375,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetAlaska Food Policy Council: $372,560 over 4y, 30% of budgetCENTER FOR A NEW ECONOMY INC: $370,000 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetHAWAII CHILDREN'S ACTION NETWORK: $370,000 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetFEEDING KENTUCKY INC: $339,500 over 7y, 3.2% of budgetINVEST IN LOUISIANA: $326,000 over 6y, 12% of budgetCENTER FOR RURAL AFFAIRS: $316,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetTHE AFN EDUCATION FUND: $310,000 over 3y, 41% of budgetALASKA NATIVE TRIBAL HEALTH CONSORTIUM: $310,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPOVERTY SOLUTIONS GROUP INC: $310,000 over 4y, 39% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $308,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetRegional Food Bank of Northeast Florida Inc: $305,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE CENTER: $292,500 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $289,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMISSOURI BUDGET PROJECT: $288,000 over 4y, 8.1% of budgetVOICES FOR GEORGIA'S CHILDREN INC: $285,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetESPACIOS ABIERTOS PUERTO RICO INC: $285,000 over 4y, 15% of budgetMOMSRISING EDUCATION FUND: $280,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA ALLIANCE FOR HEALTH: $280,000 over 4y, 40% of budgetFeeding Indiana's Hungry Inc: $265,000 over 6y, 16% of budgetHUNGER FREE OKLAHOMA INC: $260,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetINDIANA JUSTICE PROJECT INC: $255,000 over 3y, 44% of budgetLatino Community Fund Inc: $255,000 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetFLORIDA POLICY INSTITUTE INC: $255,000 over 4y, 4.2% of budgetPREBLE STREET: $252,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetNC BUDGET & TAX CENTER: $240,000 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetFEEDING LOUISIANA: $236,500 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetGood Shepherd Food Bank: $235,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM E MORRIS INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS ACTION ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds TENNESSEE JUSTICE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES ↗
  • Who funds ALABAMA ARISE ↗
  • Who funds OPENSKY POLICY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS HUNGER RELIEF ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds INDY HUNGER NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA IMPACT INC ↗
  • Who funds Kansas Appleseed Center for Law and Justice Inc ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA POLICY INC ↗
  • Who funds OFFICE OF KENTUCKY LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW AND ECONOMIC JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds MISSISSIPPI CENTER FOR JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS ACTION FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING ALABAMA ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII FOODBANK INC ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Alaska Food Policy Council ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR A NEW ECONOMY INC ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII CHILDREN'S ACTION NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING KENTUCKY INC ↗
  • Who funds INVEST IN LOUISIANA ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR RURAL AFFAIRS ↗
  • Who funds THE AFN EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds ALASKA NATIVE TRIBAL HEALTH CONSORTIUM ↗
  • Who funds POVERTY SOLUTIONS GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC ↗
  • Who funds Regional Food Bank of Northeast Florida Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI BUDGET PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds VOICES FOR GEORGIA'S CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds ESPACIOS ABIERTOS PUERTO RICO INC ↗
  • Who funds MOMSRISING EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA ALLIANCE FOR HEALTH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Food Research & Actio…Center on Budget and …Share Our StrengthAnnie E Casey Foundat…American Heart Associ…Economic Policy Insti…New Venture FundCenter for Law and So…Community Catalyst IncFeeding AmericaThe Albertsons Compan…WK Kellogg Foundation
Food Research & Action CenterDC82.5× affinity39 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Food Research & Action Center · Center on Budget and Policy Priorities · Share Our Strength · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · American Heart Association Inc · Economic Policy Institute · New Venture Fund · Center for Law and Social Policy · Community Catalyst Inc · Feeding America · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Hunger Free Oklahoma Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Partners for a Hunger Free Oregon: 31% of income from government
  • Food Bank of Delaware Inc: 26% of income from government
  • Hunger Free Vermont Inc: 24% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Oregon Food Bank: 21% of income from government
  • Vermont Foodbank: 13% of income from government
  • Community Servings Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Tulsa Community Foundation: 11% of income from government
  • Food for Lane County: 5% of income from government
  • Treasure Coast Food Bank Inc: 2% of income from government
  • All Faiths Food Bank Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Worcester County Food Bank Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Regional Food Bank of Northeast Florida Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Center for Food Action in New Jersey: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
74report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 186 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home