Skip to content
Mayo Clinic at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Mayo Clinic

To inspire hope and contribute to health and well-being by providing the best care to every patient through integrated clinical practice, education and research.

$607M
Granted FY2024still arriving
256
Grants FY2024still arriving
40
States reached
$120M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$3.9BEducation$125MScience & Tech$35MPhilanthropy$7.5MHuman Services$4.5MCommunity Improvement$3.3MYouth Development$2.6MArts & Culture$2.0MOther$0
02FY2024 · 256 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 256 grants below total $572,102,597, the rows itemized in this filing. The $607,369,592 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $35,266,995 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k20 grants · $134k
  • $10k–50k95 grants · $2.4M
  • $50k–250k92 grants · $10M
  • $250k+49 grants · $559M
$60,000
Median grant
40
States reached
$26.7B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAYO CLINIC JACKSONVILLE$120,250,322
MCHS--SOUTHWEST MINNESOTA REGION$118,423,244
MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA$97,499,392
MCHS--SOUTHWEST WISCONSIN REGION INC$95,970,322
MAYO FOUNDATION FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH$65,126,108
MCHS--SOUTHEAST MINNESOTA REGION$28,352,119
MAYO CLINIC FLORIDA$4,570,352
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO$3,185,286
MAYO CLINIC HOSPITAL-- ROCHESTER$2,547,278
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA$2,123,485
INDIANA UNIVERSITY$1,589,992
UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CENTER HOSPITAL$1,327,890
TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$969,064
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS M D ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$936,053
EMORY UNIVERSITY$927,650
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF WINONA-ROCHESTER: $150k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF WINONA-ROCHESTER: $75k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF WINONA-ROCHESTER: $25k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF WINONA-ROCHESTER: $25k → 14%MANKATO YOUTH PLACE INC: $50k → 15%FAMILY PROMISE ROCHESTER: $77k → 9%FAMILY SERVICE ROCHESTER INC: $76k → 9%INTERCULTURAL MUTUAL ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION OF SEMN: $73k → 9%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $750k → 14%INTERCULTURAL MUTUAL ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION OF SEMN: $60k → 9%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $140k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $63k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $50k → 14%FAMILY PROMISE ROCHESTER: $52k → 9%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $45k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $40k → 14%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE GREATER TWIN CITIES: $140k → 11%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE GREATER TWIN CITIES: $79k → 11%INTERCULTURAL MUTUAL ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION: $39k → 9%INTERCULTURAL MUTUAL ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION: $35k → 9%INTERCULTURAL MUTUAL ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION: $35k → 9%FAMILY PROMISE ROCHESTER: $32k → 9%FAMILY SERVICE ROCHESTER INC: $30k → 9%INTERCULTURAL MUTUAL ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION: $25k → 9%FAMILY SERVICE ROCHESTER INC: $25k → 9%WOMEN'S SHELTER INC: $75k → 9%WOMEN'S SHELTER INC: $65k → 9%WOMEN'S SHELTER INC: $40k → 9%WOMEN'S SHELTER INC: $40k → 9%WOMEN'S SHELTER INC: $35k → 9%WOMEN'S SHELTER INC: $32k → 9%WOMEN'S SHELTER INC: $30k → 9%COMMUNITY FOOD RESPONSE: $30k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.0B · 384 repeat orgs$98M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

384 repeat relationships: 219 still active in FY2024, 165 since wound down; 28 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

384
149

Total granted

$4.0B
$96M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+17%

Still filing today

58%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $17M · revenue +51%
  • EU
    Emory University
    8× · 2017–2024 · $8.7M · revenue +80%
  • University of Chicago
    8× · 2017–2024 · $5.5M · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • OH
    OKEFENOKEE HEALTH INC
    one grant, 2017 · $90M · revenue -100% · 71% of their budget
  • MR
    MEDICA RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2017 · $262k
  • NI
    NFERENCE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $261k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
2
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
3
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
4
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
5
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
6
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
7
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
8
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
9
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
10
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
11
Loyola University Medical Center

We, loyola university health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.lumc is a member of loyola university health system and trinity…

Health
12
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Montefiore Medical Center; the most unlike its peers is The Ladder for America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

361 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 361 of the 576 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

19
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
46
Early backer (in before they grew)
350/361
Grantees still filing
279/361
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAYO CLINIC: $1,632,048,302 · OtherMAYO CLINICMAYO CLINIC: $1,030,596,434 · OtherMAYO CLINICMAYO CLINIC: $338,329,964 · OtherMAYO CLINICMAYO CLINIC: $249,291,862 · OtherMAYO CLINICMAYO CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM-SOUTHWEST WISCONSIN REGION INC: $165,265,519 · OtherMAYO CLINIC: $142,100,721 · Other+103 more: $369,548,865 · Other+103 moreDUKE UNIVERSITY: $16,960,799 · EducationEmory University: $8,731,851 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $8,207,928 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $7,802,631 · EducationUniversity of Chicago: $5,472,609 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $3,797,009 · EducationYale University: $3,444,855 · EducationUniversity of Miami: $2,622,631 · Education+20 more: $19,086,328 · EducationSANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE: $5,264,658 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $5,189,421 · HealthDUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $3,006,866 · HealthTHOUGHT LEADERSHIP AND INNOVATION FOUNDATION: $2,510,963 · HealthHENNEPIN HEALTHCARE RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $2,465,123 · HealthHEALTHPARTNERS INSTITUTE: $2,217,803 · Health+47 more: $27,573,182 · HealthUNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST MINNESOTA: $3,452,450 · PhilanthropyROCHESTER AREA FOUNDATION: $976,000 · PhilanthropyNEXUS FAMILY HEALING: $2,800,000 · Crime & LegalLEGAL ASSISTANCE OF OLMSTED COUNTY: $568,900 · Crime & LegalGENEVA FOUNDATION: $737,727 · Science & TechCARNEGIE INSTITUTION OF WASHINGTON: $472,410 · Science & TechSAGE BIONETWORKS: $423,215 · Science & TechResearch Triangle Institute: $321,561 · Science & TechAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,088,200 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S SHELTER INC: $332,400 · Human Services
Other$3,927,181,667Education$76,126,641Health$48,228,016Philanthropy$4,428,450Crime & Legal$3,368,900Science & Tech$1,954,913Human Services$1,420,600

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOKEFENOKEE HEALTH INC: $90,354,407 over 1y, 71% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $16,960,799 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetEmory University: $8,731,851 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $8,207,928 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $7,802,631 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $5,472,609 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE: $5,264,658 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $5,189,421 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $3,797,009 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST MINNESOTA: $3,452,450 over 8y, 14% of budgetYale University: $3,444,855 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $3,006,866 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNEXUS FAMILY HEALING: $2,800,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $2,622,631 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHOUGHT LEADERSHIP AND INNOVATION FOUNDATION: $2,510,963 over 7y, 84% of budgetHENNEPIN HEALTHCARE RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $2,465,123 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetROCHESTER DOWNTOWN ALLIANCE: $2,410,703 over 5y, 50% of budgetTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $2,313,263 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTHPARTNERS INSTITUTE: $2,217,803 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $2,188,074 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $2,126,042 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $1,610,427 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMaineHealth: $1,455,810 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION: $1,452,426 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION: $1,423,095 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetVanderbilt University: $1,361,236 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $1,305,425 over 5y, 6.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $1,276,487 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNTAIN PARK HEALTH CENTER: $1,229,964 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $1,218,125 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $1,143,471 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCarnegie Mellon University: $1,114,428 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,088,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $1,087,541 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FTD DISORDERS REGISTRY LLC: $1,077,826 over 6y, 30% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $1,014,486 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES: $985,986 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetROCHESTER AREA FOUNDATION: $976,000 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetAMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS: $957,294 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS: $946,359 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $943,911 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetKAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS: $938,907 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHENRY M JACKSON FOUNDATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MILITARY MEDICINE: $926,700 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetALASKA NATIVE TRIBAL HEALTH CONSORTIUM: $878,993 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $805,026 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM: $796,679 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetINTERMOUNTAIN HEALTH CARE INC: $756,134 over 6y, 26% of budgetGENEVA FOUNDATION: $737,727 over 5y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OKEFENOKEE HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST MINNESOTA ↗
  • Who funds Yale University ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds NEXUS FAMILY HEALING ↗
  • Who funds University of Miami ↗
  • Who funds THOUGHT LEADERSHIP AND INNOVATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rochester Area Founda…Mayo Clinic Group Ret…Alliance for Clinical…United Way of Southea…Vanderbilt University…The Children's Hospit…Alliance Nctn Foundat…The Trustees of Colum…Yale UniversityOtto Bremer TrustCystic Fibrosis Found…The Children's Oncolo…
Rochester Area FoundationMN128× affinity74 shared granteesties to 3 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rochester Area Foundation · Mayo Clinic Group Return · Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Foundation · United Way of Southeast Minnesota · Vanderbilt University Medical Center · The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · Alliance Nctn Foundation · The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York · Yale University · Otto Bremer Trust · Cystic Fibrosis Foundation · The Children's Oncology Group Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mayo Clinic funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mayo Clinic. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine: 100% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Northeastern University: 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • Yale New Haven Health Services Corporation: 3% of income from government
  • United Way of Northeast Florida Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Orlando Health Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
22report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Mayo Clinic?

Find your warmest path to Mayo Clinic through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 576 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mayo Clinic’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home