· Private foundation
Maynard Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $53k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $137k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Uncharted Ministries co CRM | $43,450 |
| Others Under 5000 each | $16,950 |
| Crisis Response Ministry | $16,000 |
| Refuge City | $15,550 |
| Watermark Community Church | $12,000 |
| Cornerstone Christian Church | $12,000 |
| ComeNserv - TX | $10,980 |
| Gift of Adoption Fund | $10,000 |
| Mulberry International | $9,600 |
| Individual grant recipient | $9,600 |
| Bumps Mission to Mexico | $8,400 |
| Individual grant recipient | $8,000 |
| ComeNServ - KY | $6,000 |
| Central Christian Church | $6,000 |
| TBOC Ministries | $5,600 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 73% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of -7% since the first grant, against -74% for the ones you funded once.
21 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GOGIFT OF ADOPTION FUND INC3× · 2023–2025 · $21k · revenue +33%
- LFLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC3× · 2022–2024 · $11k · revenue +27%
- NCNATIONAL CENTER ON SEXUAL EXPLOITATION2× · 2022–2023 · $7k · revenue +84%
Funded once
- TCTBOC CHURCHone grant, 2021 · $21k
- OUOthers Under 4000 eachone grant, 2024 · $11k
- O2Others 2000 and belowone grant, 2022 · $8k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Refuge seeks to glorify God by partnering with local churches to love refugees and immigrants.
SOS provides assistance to poor and marginalized people in the USA & other countries. SOS feeds the hungry, drills water wells, contributes to schools and operates an orphanage. SOS also rescues and rehabilitates victims of sex trafficking.
Passionlife ministries is a global missions initiative to spread the gospel of life and expand the pregnancy help movement among nations plagued by abortion, infanticide and gendercide.
Nightlight is an international organization compelled by love to reach out to, rescue, and restore all those who are negatively impacted by sex trafficking and commercial sexual exploitation.
To glorify the Lord Jesus Christ by ministering to orphans around the world by meeting spiritual, physical, emotional, and educational needs.
Redeem's mission is to protect widows and orphans from violent abuse and exploitation.
Wings of refuge is a long-term restoration home for female adults who have survived commercial sexual exploitation and/or trafficking. we provide a safe, christ centered atmosphere of healing and restoration for each participant.
In association with Light of the Gospel Church, we propagate the gospel of Jesus Christ by all available means, both at home and in foreign lands. We provide evangelism and rehabilitation to orphaned and/or drug addicted children and…
Ministering to victims of sex-trafficking.
Sozo International partners with at-risk families to create a sustainable future and transformed lives through education, health, and economic initiatives.
To restore the lives of those who have been rescued from sexual exploitation
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifesong for Orphans Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bumps Mission to Mexico. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CRISIS RESPONSE MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds Bumps Mission To Mexico ↗
- Who funds REFUGE CITY ↗
- Who funds MULBERRY INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds GIFT OF ADOPTION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC ↗
- Who funds CHALLENGER FILMS INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CENTER ON SEXUAL EXPLOITATION ↗
- Who funds POIEMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Proem Support Ministries Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Maynard Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.