Skip to content

· Private foundation

Maxwell Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$22kHealth$16kEnvironment$10kPhilanthropy$8kHousing & Shelter$3kHuman Services$3kEducation$3kPublic Benefit$100
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$448k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Rising Star Outreach$5,100
Southern Virginia University$2,500
Central Valley Community Foundation$2,500
THE SHALOM FOUNDATION$1,500
FRESNO MISSION$1,250
JACKSON HOLE LAND TRUST$1,000
Mothers Without Borders$1,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BOARDERS$500
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$250
The Leadership Institute$100
National Parks Conservation Associa$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MARJAREE MASON CENTER: $3k → 19%Rising Star Outreach: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 26% of Maxwell Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Maxwell Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$34k · 6 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
5

Total granted

$34k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-3%
+198%

Still filing today

67%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’24
Human ServicesHealthEnvironmentPhilanthropyEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SHALOM FOUNDATION
    5× · 2018–2024 · $14k · revenue -3%
  • JH
    JACKSON HOLE LAND TRUST
    3× · 2019–2024 · $9k · revenue -33%
  • MW
    Mothers Without Borders
    3× · 2017–2024 · $7k · revenue +144%

Funded once

  • CH
    COMMUNITY HOSPITALS OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +198%
  • MARJAREE MASON CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +153%
  • GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +281%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sacramento Region Community Foundation

The Sacramento Region Community Foundation leads, serves, and inspires enduring philanthropy for a just and vibrant Sacramento region.

Philanthropy
2
The Sierra Fund

The Sierra Fund (TSF) is a non-profit organization with a mission to restore ecosystem and community resiliency in the Sierra Nevada.

Environment
3
The Montana Land Reliance

The mission of the montana land reliance (mlr) is to partner with landowners to provide permanent protection for private lands that are significant for agricultural production, fish and wildlife habitat, and open space.

Environment
4
Carson Tahoe Regional Healthcare

To enhance the health and well-being of the communities we serve.

Health
5
Conservation Legacy

Conservation legacy engages future leaders who protect, restore, and enhance our nation's lands through community-based service.in 2024, conservation legacy engaged 2,524 participants who completed over 1.5 million service hours on public…

Youth Development
6
San Luis Valley Health Foundation

Acquire and manage assets in support of lutheran hospital association of the san luis valley.

Philanthropy
7
California Farmland Trust

The mission of the California Farmland Trust is to help farmers protect the best farmland in the world.

Environment
8
Salem Health Hospitals & Clinics

To support salem health, salem health west valley and related organizations.

—
9
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
10
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
11
Conservation Farms & Ranches

Preserving and enhancing the habitat of wildlife, such as sandhill cranes, waterfowl, raptors, which habitat expenses are supported by agricultural activities.

Housing & Shelter
12
Claremont Graduate University

Claremont Graduate University prepares individuals to be leaders for positive change in the world. Unique in its transdisciplinary approach, the University is dedicated to the creation, dissemination, and application of new knowledge and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Hospitals of Central California Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Grand Teton National Park Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE SHALOM FOUNDATION: $13,500 · Human ServicesTHE SHALOM FOUNDATIONRising Star Outreach Inc: $5,100 · Human ServicesRising Star Outreach IncMARJAREE MASON CENTER INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesMARJAREE MASON CENTER INCCOMMUNITY HOSPITALS OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY HOSPITALS OF CENTRAL…Mothers Without Borders: $7,133 · HealthMothers Without BordersJACKSON HOLE LAND TRUST: $8,500 · EnvironmentJACKSON HOLE LA…Central Valley Community Foundation A Corporation: $5,000 · PhilanthropyCentral Valle…GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $2,500 · PhilanthropyGRAND TETON N…FRESNO RESCUE MISSION INC: $3,250 · Housing & ShelterCALIFORNIA AG LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $1,000 · OtherDOCTORS WITHOUT BOARDERS: $1,000 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $950 · Other+2 more: $200 · OtherSOUTHERN VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY: $2,500 · EducationLeadership Institute: $100 · Public Benefit
Human Services$21,100Health$17,133Environment$8,500Philanthropy$7,500Housing & Shelter$3,250Other$3,150Education$2,500Public Benefit$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE SHALOM FOUNDATION: $13,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOSPITALS OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJACKSON HOLE LAND TRUST: $8,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMothers Without Borders: $7,133 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetRising Star Outreach Inc: $5,100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCentral Valley Community Foundation A Corporation: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRESNO RESCUE MISSION INC: $3,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMARJAREE MASON CENTER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Richard & Althea Johanson Family FoundationCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Richard & Althea Johanson Family Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Maxwell Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Maxwell Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Maxwell Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Maxwell Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Maxwell’s filings →

    More from the funding graph