Skip to content
Maxine and Jack Zarrow Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Maxine and Jack Zarrow Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
117
Grants FY2024still arriving
14
States reached
$600k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$5.8MHealth$4.3MHuman Services$1.5MReligion$1.4MPhilanthropy$1.0MArts & Culture$854kHousing & Shelter$686kCrime & Legal$672kOther$0
02FY2024 · 117 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k59 grants · $216k
  • $10k–50k50 grants · $974k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $300k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.4M
$9,400
Median grant
14
States reached
$50M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAYO CLINIC$600,000
UNIVERSITY OF TULSA THE$500,000
HILLEL JEWISH STUDENT CENTER AT OU$250,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
CONGREGATION EMANU-EL$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
HOLLAND HALL SCHOOL$50,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS$50,000
IRON GATE INC$37,500
TULSA DAY CENTER INC$36,500
TOWN & COUNTRY SCHOOL$35,000
YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA$35,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OKLAHOMA$30,000
MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OKLAHOMA$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CAMP KESEM NATIONAL: $16k → 14%CAMP KESEM NATIONAL: $16k → 14%CAMP KESEM NATIONAL: $16k → 14%VIZAVANCE INC: $10k → 15%VIZAVANCE INC: $10k → 15%VIZAVANCE INC: $10k → 15%CAMP KESEM NATIONAL: $14k → 8%VIZAVANCE INC: $10k → 15%CAMP KESEM NATIONAL: $14k → 8%NEIGHBORS ALONG THE LINE: $21k → 14%NEIGHBORS ALONG THE LINE: $21k → 14%SISU YOUTH INC: $20k → 16%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVICES: $15k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVICES: $15k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVICES: $15k → 10%EASTERN OKLAHOMA DONATED DENTAL SERVICES: $25k → 15%EASTERN OKLAHOMA DONATED DENTAL SERVICES: $25k → 15%CROSSTOWN LEARNING CENTER INC: $15k → 15%BRIDGES FOUNDATION THE: $25k → 15%CROSSTOWN LEARNING CENTER INC: $15k → 15%BRIDGES FOUNDATION THE: $25k → 15%BRIDGES FOUNDATION THE: $25k → 15%BRIDGES FOUNDATION THE: $25k → 15%EMERGENCY INFANT SERVICES: $20k → 15%EMERGENCY INFANT SERVICES: $20k → 15%CLAREHOUSE: $15k → 15%CLAREHOUSE: $15k → 15%CLAREHOUSE: $15k → 15%CLAREHOUSE: $15k → 15%CLAREHOUSE: $15k → 15%FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $150k → 15%FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $50k → 15%FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $50k → 15%FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $50k → 15%FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $50k → 15%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA: $25k → 15%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA: $25k → 15%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA: $25k → 15%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA: $25k → 15%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA: $25k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA: $35k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA: $35k → 15%BRIDGES FOUNDATION THE: $25k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA: $35k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA: $35k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA: $35k → 15%GREENWOOD CULTURAL CENTER: $24k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA: $18k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
IN
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
NE
VA
MD
KS
AR
NC
DC
HI
OK
LA
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of Maxine and Jack Zarrow Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Maxine and Jack Zarrow Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.2% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14M · 144 repeat orgs$982k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

144 repeat relationships: 63 still active in FY2024, 81 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

144
68

Total granted

$14M
$840k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+12%

Still filing today

80%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $142k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureHealthCrime & LegalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • The University of Tulsa
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.6M · revenue +16%
  • OS
    Oklahoma State University Foundation
    2× · 2020–2021 · $2.0M · revenue +63%
  • MH
    Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma
    5× · 2020–2024 · $709k · revenue +173%

Funded once

  • AO
    ACADEMY OF ENDOSCOPY INC
    one grant, 2020 · $187k · revenue -86% · 71% of their budget
  • Still She Rises Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $180k · revenue +37%
  • The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

—
2
Opportunity Partners

Mission: together we advance the quality of life for people with disabilities. vision: people of all abilities thrive in the world. values: impact- generate solutions that make a difference. choice - create opportunities for people to lead…

Employment
3
Oklahoma City University

Inspired by a culture of creativity, Oklahoma City University fosters an immersive, personalized experience that welcomes and prepares students to pursue boundless opportunities.

Education
4
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
5
Twin Cities Diversity in Practice

To attract, recruit, advance, and retain attorneys of color in the twin cities through education and collaboration with member organizations.

Community Improvement
6
United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc

United way of central oklahoma is committed to connecting people and resources to improve the well being of those in our community.

Philanthropy
7
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
8
Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs Inc

To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.

Public Safety & Disaster
9
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
10
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
11
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
12
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma; the most unlike its peers is Flyaway Productions. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

199 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 199 of the 248 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
42
Early backer (in before they grew)
197/199
Grantees still filing
133/199
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The University of Tulsa: $2,612,750 · EducationThe University of TulsaOklahoma State University Foundation: $2,017,400 · EducationOklahoma State University Foundat…+16 more: $519,425 · Education+16 moreIndividual grant recipient: $803,461 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $490,374 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHILLEL JEWISH STUDENT CENTER AT OU: $355,000 · OtherHILLEL JEWISH STUDENT CENTER AT O…CONGREGATION EMANU-EL: $313,500 · OtherCONGREGATION EMANU-ELVALEO COMMUNITY RESIDENCE PROGRAM: $285,141 · OtherVALEO COMMUNITY RESIDENCE PROGRAMHOLLAND HALL: $254,826 · OtherThe Town & Country School Inc: $182,500 · OtherTULSA DAY CENTER INC: $230,060 · OtherIRON GATE INC: $182,500 · Other+82 more: $2,107,373 · Other+82 moreMAYO CLINIC: $1,800,000 · HealthMAYO CLINICMental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma: $709,090 · HealthMental Health Associat…PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS: $385,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD GRE…ACADEMY OF ENDOSCOPY INC: $187,000 · HealthACADEMY OF ENDOSCOPY I…+12 more: $361,700 · Health+12 moreFamily & Childrens Services Inc: $360,000 · Human ServicesFamily & …YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA INC: $208,200 · Human ServicesYOUTH SER…ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA INC: $125,000 · Human ServicesASSISTANC…THE BRIDGES FOUNDATION: $125,000 · Human ServicesTHE BRIDG…Camp Kesem National: $76,000 · Human ServicesClarehouse Inc: $75,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $68,000 · Human Services+19 more: $491,150 · Human Services+19 moreTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $403,500 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $176,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA: $125,000 · PhilanthropySLINGSHOT FUND INC: $60,000 · PhilanthropyBEND THE ARC - A JEWISH PARTNERSHIP FOR JUSTICE: $50,000 · Philanthropy+11 more: $138,588 · PhilanthropyTULSA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $300,000 · Arts & CultureJewish Film Institute: $129,935 · Arts & CultureOKLAHOMA ARTS INSTITUTE INC: $45,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $45,000 · Arts & CultureCLOSE UP FOUNDATION: $45,000 · Arts & CultureJOHN HOPE FRANKLIN CENTER FOR RECONCILIATION INC: $44,600 · Arts & Culture+14 more: $143,177 · Arts & CultureLEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC: $220,000 · Crime & LegalStill She Rises Inc: $180,000 · Crime & LegalFAMILY SAFETY CENTER INC: $80,000 · Crime & LegalBRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $20,000 · Crime & LegalChild Abuse Network Inc dba Child Advocacy Network: $20,000 · Crime & LegalTULSA ADVOCATES FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN: $20,000 · Crime & Legal+7 more: $47,500 · Crime & Legal
Education$5,149,575Other$5,204,735Health$3,442,790Human Services$1,528,350Philanthropy$953,088Arts & Culture$752,712Crime & Legal$587,500

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe University of Tulsa: $2,612,750 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetOklahoma State University Foundation: $2,017,400 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $1,800,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma: $709,090 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $403,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS: $385,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetFamily & Childrens Services Inc: $360,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTULSA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $300,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetTULSA DAY CENTER INC: $230,060 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetLEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC: $220,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetYOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA INC: $208,200 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetACADEMY OF ENDOSCOPY INC: $187,000 over 1y, 71% of budgetIRON GATE INC: $182,500 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetThe Town & Country School Inc: $182,500 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetStill She Rises Inc: $180,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $176,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTULSA AREA UNITED WAY: $150,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetJewish Film Institute: $129,935 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA INC: $125,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA: $125,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BRIDGES FOUNDATION: $125,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $117,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTulsa Community College Foundation: $112,225 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetFrancis W Parker School: $93,200 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY SAFETY CENTER INC: $80,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetCamp Kesem National: $76,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetNEWVIEW OKLAHOMA INC: $75,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetClarehouse Inc: $75,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetOKLAHOMA POLICY INC: $75,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $68,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRESTORE HOPE MINISTRIES INC: $65,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetPALMER CONTINUUM OF CARE INC: $60,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSLINGSHOT FUND INC: $60,000 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CONNECTION INC: $55,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetVIZAVANCE INC: $50,750 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetBEND THE ARC - A JEWISH PARTNERSHIP FOR JUSTICE: $50,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEmergency Infant Services Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetEASTERN OKLAHOMA DONATED DENTAL SERVICES INC: $50,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetHIV Resource Consortium Inc dba Tulsa CARES: $49,200 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetOKLAHOMA ARTS INSTITUTE INC: $45,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $45,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetABILITY RESOURCES INC: $45,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetCLOSE UP FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetJOHN HOPE FRANKLIN CENTER FOR RECONCILIATION INC: $44,600 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetOKLAHOMA PROJECT WOMAN INC: $42,500 over 3y, 1.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The University of Tulsa ↗
  • Who funds Oklahoma State University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma ↗
  • Who funds TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS ↗
  • Who funds Family & Childrens Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds TULSA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds TULSA DAY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA INC ↗
  • Who funds ACADEMY OF ENDOSCOPY INC ↗
  • Who funds IRON GATE INC ↗
  • Who funds The Town & Country School Inc ↗
  • Who funds Still She Rises Inc ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds TULSA AREA UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Film Institute ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA ↗
  • Who funds THE BRIDGES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds Tulsa Community College Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Francis W Parker School ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SAFETY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Camp Kesem National ↗
  • Who funds NEWVIEW OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds Clarehouse Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Anne and Henry Za…George Kaiser Family …The Gelvin FoundationThe Sharna and Irvin …The Hardesty Family F…Mervin Bovaird Founda…Sanford P & Irene F B…Grace & Franklin Bern…Ralph and Frances McG…One Gas Foundation IncCharles and Lynn Schu…Zarrow Families Found…
The Anne and Henry Zarrow FoundationOK145.2× affinity75 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · George Kaiser Family Foundation · The Gelvin Foundation · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation · The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · Mervin Bovaird Foundation · Sanford P & Irene F Burnstein Foundation Irene F Burnstein Co-Trustee · Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation · Ralph and Frances McGill Foundation the Trust Company of Oklahoma · One Gas Foundation Inc · Charles and Lynn Schusterman Family Foundation · Zarrow Families Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Maxine and Jack Zarrow Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Maxine and Jack Zarrow Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 320%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Newview Oklahoma Inc: 45% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Supporters of Families With Sickle Cell Disease: 26% of income from government
  • Community Health Connection Inc: 18% of income from government
  • Domestic Violence Intervention Services: 15% of income from government
  • Ability Resources Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Legal Aid Services of Oklahoma Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Tulsa Community Foundation: 11% of income from government
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Tulsa Day Center Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Youth Services of Tulsa Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma: 8% of income from government
  • The University of Tulsa: 5% of income from government
  • Sharsheret Inc: 4% of income from government
  • The Philbrook Museum of Art Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Ywca Tulsa Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Theatre Tulsa Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Dean Mcgee Eye Institute: 1% of income from government
  • Grand Lake Mental Health Center Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Oklahoma Arts Institute Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Family & Childrens Services Inc: 1% of income from government
  • The Bottom Line Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Tulsa Habitat for Humanity Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Global Gardens Incorporated: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
32get no government money at all
64report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Maxine and Jack Zarrow Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Maxine and Jack Zarrow Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 248 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Maxine and Jack Zarrow Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home