A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 63% of Max and Lilian Rappaport Foundation FT Treatment & Study of Social Trauma’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

—

2020

—

2021

—

2022

treatmentprogramschesedpassaicyeshiva

2023

treatmentprogramschicagochesedpassaicresearch

2024

treatmentprogramsmedical researchyeshiva ktanaktana passaictorah

2025

congregationtreatmentprogramsmedical researchfoodpassaic

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

$10k–50k8 grants · $200k
$50k–250k13 grants · $2.1M
$250k+11 grants · $3.3M

$200,000

Median grant

States reached

$52M

Total assets

Largest grants

Steven Stiller Tunnel to Towers$500,000
Cong Chasdei Lev$350,000
Bright Focus Found Alzheimers Research$300,000
The Valley Hospital Foundation$300,000
Bylthedale Childrens Hospital$300,000
Hackensack Meridian Health Foundation$300,000
Folds of Honor Foundation$250,000
Progeria Research Foundation$250,000
Community Food Bank of NJ$250,000
A Torah Infertility$250,000
Alpine Learning Group Inc$250,000
The Gary Clausner Chesed Fund$225,000
Yeshiva Ktana of Passaic$200,000
Washington University School of Med Cerebral Palsy$200,000
Why Hunger Inc$200,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 11%. 55% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$10M · 24 repeat orgs$3.1M to everyone else

24 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$10M

$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%

+87%

Still filing today

42%

36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.0M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthEducationReligionPhilanthropyInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

TV
The Valley Hospital Foundation
3× · 2022–2024 · $950k · revenue +157%
FO
Folds of Honor Foundation
3× · 2022–2024 · $600k · revenue +162%
PR
Progeria Research Foundation
3× · 2022–2024 · $600k · revenue +70%

Funded once

TG
The Gary Klauser Chesed Fund
one grant, 2023 · $225k
HO
Hatzolah of PassaicClifton EMS
one grant, 2022 · $125k
MS
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
one grant, 2022 · $100k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

American Friends of Hakav Hameached

To help and support children with rare syndromes and disorders and their families to help and support children victimized and traumatized by terror attacks and their families

International

Bonei Olam Division of Central Jersey

Bonei Olam provides financial assistance,guidance & referrals for assisted reproductive technology,including consultations, work up, medications, high risk pregnancy,Preimplantation genetic diagnosis,pre & post…

International

Smach Zevilin of Ny Inc

To provide financial aid and assistance to the poor, sick & disabled people, and monetary support to needy families in time of need.

Philanthropy

Tefillin Together

To provide needy jewish families around the world with phylacteries ("tefillin") that they are not otherwise able to afford. these phylacteries are to be donated to the needy families free of charge. donning phylacteries is a daily…

—

Paramus Childrens Health Foundation

Benefit families of the ill children residing in paramus, nj. provide financial assistance to these families to care for an ill child. also benefit paramus facilities to help disabled children.

—

Yeshivat Leluv of Jerusalem Inc

Charitable work to help people in need

—

Bais Yehuda Perach Rochel Foundation

Public Benefit

Yeshuas Chaim Inc

Promoting torah learning in israel; promoting awareness of todays mental health challenges and to provide financial assistance to individuals and families suffering from mental and emotional health issues. the organization will also…

Philanthropy

Bikur Cholim of Passaic-Clifton Inc

To provide and coordinate distribution of financial aid, meals, transportation,and other daily needs to the sick and handicapped families in the Passaic- Clifton area.

Human Services

Jewish Federation of Northern New Jersey Inc

Jewish Federation of Northern New Jersey CREATES A STRONGER, MORE VIBRANT JEWISH EXPERIENCE IN NORTHERN NEW Jersey, Israel and (Continued on Schedule O, Statement 1)

Philanthropy

Jordan Avi Ogman Foundation Inc

To raise money and awareness for children with jewish genetic dieseases, specifically tecpr2.

Health

United Jewish Childrens Fund Inc

Grants to needy individuals and scholarships for underpriveleged children

Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital and the most unlike its peers is Guiding Eyes for the Blind Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/23

the rest of the field

11%

206,164/1,819,542

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

20 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

19/20

Grantees still filing

17/20

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$8,340,000Health$1,704,500Human Services$1,325,000Religion$950,000Education$705,000Philanthropy$150,000International$25,000Housing & Shelter$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY18.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Cross River Community Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation Max and Lilian Rappaport Foundation FT Treatment & Study of Social Trauma funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

3get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Care Plus Foundation Inc.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~38 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 223561909 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Care Plus Foundation Inc, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 38 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 58% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Max and Lilian Rappaport Foundation FT Treatment & Study of Social Trauma?

Find your warmest path to Max and Lilian Rappaport Foundation FT Treatment & Study of Social Trauma through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

Max and Lilian Rappaport Foundation FT Treatment & Study of Social Trauma

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

20 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Max and Lilian Rappaport Foundation FT Treatment & Study of Social Trauma?

More from the funding graph

Max and Lilian Rappaport Foundation FT Treatment & Study of Social Trauma

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

20 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Max and Lilian Rappaport Foundation FT Treatment & Study of Social Trauma?

More from the funding graph