Skip to content

· Private foundation

Max a Adler Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$300k
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$699kPhilanthropy$310kEducation$125kFood & Nutrition$124kArts & Culture$93kCrime & Legal$52kYouth Development$52kPublic Benefit$46kOther$0
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k22 grants · $100k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $100k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$371k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ANNUAL GIFT$100,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF ROCHESTER$30,000
JEWISH HOME FOUNDATION$20,000
SALVATION ARMY$15,000
COMPEER INC$15,000
UNITED WAY OF GREATER ROCHESTER$10,000
FOOD LINK$10,000
UNCFTHE COLLEGE FUND$5,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC$5,000
GEVA THEATRE CENTER$5,000
ROCHESTER PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA$5,000
JOSEPH AVENUE ARTS AND CULTURAL ALLIANCE$5,000
RUNDEL LIBRARY FOUNDATION$5,000
ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$5,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF ROCHESTER$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $82k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%GOODWILL OF THE FINGER LAKES: $20k → 14%GOODWILL OF THE FINGER LAKES: $10k → 14%THE CENTER FOR YOUTH SERVICES INC: $5k → 14%THE CENTER FOR YOUTH SERVICES INC: $5k → 14%THE CENTER FOR YOUTH SERVICES INC: $5k → 14%THE CENTER FOR YOUTH SERVICES INC: $5k → 14%HILLSIDE CHILDREN'S CENTER: $5k → 14%HILLSIDE CHILDREN'S CENTER: $5k → 14%HILLSIDE CHILDREN'S CENTER: $5k → 14%HILLSIDE CHILDREN'S CENTER: $5k → 14%THE CENTER FOR YOUTH SERVICES INC: $3k → 14%HILLSIDE CHILDREN'S CENTER: $3k → 14%THE CENTER FOR YOUTH SERVICES INC: $3k → 14%HILLSIDE CHILDREN'S CENTER: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 29 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
4

Total granted

$1.6M
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+7%

Still filing today

62%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationCrime & LegalFood & NutritionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FI
    FOODLINK INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $45k · revenue +52%
  • GOODWILL OF THE FINGER LAKES INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $30k · revenue +68%
  • WP
    WXXI PUBLIC BROADCASTING COUNCIL
    6× · 2020–2025 · $26k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • ES
    EASTMAN SCHOOL OF MUSIC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • RW
    ROBERTS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +7%
  • FL
    FINGER LAKES OPERA INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rochester General Health System

Rochester general health system, provides patient care, senior housing, laboratory services, and community outreach to residents and other clients in monroe county, new york and several surrounding counties.

Health
2
Rochester General College of Health Careers

The rochester general college of health careers is dedicated to preparing adult learners with the knowledge, skills, and competencies necessary to pursue health careers, advanced education, and lifelong learning.

Education
3
Rochester Public Library

To engage the community in life-long learning for all through equal access to information, technology, gathering spaces and expert staff.

Education
4
Rochesterworks Inc

The rochesterworks system stimulates local economic growth by providing outstanding employment education, support, and training services.

Employment
5
The Rochester General Hospital

To establish, erect and maintain a general hospital and dispensary in the county of monroe, ny for medical and surgical aid, care and treatment of persons in need thereof; to carry on and conduct a training school for nurses; to promote…

Health
6
Rochester Art Center

Rochester art center offers the opportunity for all people to understand and value the arts through innovative experiences with contemporary art. through world-class exhibitions and programs, we present a welcoming, integrated, and diverse…

Arts & Culture
7
Rochester Contemporary Art Center Inc

To create dialogue and build community through contemporary art exhibitions and related programs

Arts & Culture
8
Rochester Child Care Center Inc

The center strives to provide a range of services that support working parents while fostering the emotional, social, physical and intellectual growth of their children. special consideration is given to low income families and families…

Human Services
9
New York City Center Inc

The mission of new york city center is to be new york city's leading center for dance and musical theater. dedicated to making the arts accessible to the broadest possible audience, city center seeks to create a welcoming environment and…

Arts & Culture
10
Rochester Regional Health

The organization is organized and operated for the benefit of all of the affiliates within rochester regional health system. the organization supports and assists the affiliates by reviewing and monitoring their missions, objectives,…

Health
11
Rit Global Delivery Corporation

Provide administrative and other support services to academic programs sponsored by rochester institute of technology both in the united states and abroad.

Education
12
The Unity Hospital of Rochester

See schedule oto make a positive difference in the lives and health status of individuals in the city of rochester, ny and western monroe county. we will educate our community, our providers, and future health care professionals in order…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Senior Life Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Joseph Avenue Arts and Culture Alliance Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
16/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF ROCHESTER: $265,000 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF ROCHESTERJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ANNUAL GIFT: $250,000 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ANNUAL GIFTJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ROCHESTER: $240,000 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ROCHESTERJEWISH SENIOR LIFE - GREENHOUSE: $78,500 · OtherJEWISH SENIOR LIFE - GREENHOUSETHE SALVATION ARMY: $61,000 · OtherCOMPEER INC: $46,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF GREATER ROCHESTER: $45,000 · Other+15 more: $260,000 · Other+15 moreWXXI PUBLIC BROADCASTING COUNCIL: $26,000 · Arts & CultureGEVA THEATRE CENTER INC: $26,000 · Arts & CultureROCHESTER PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA INC: $26,000 · Arts & CultureJoseph Avenue Arts and Culture Alliance Inc: $10,000 · Arts & CultureFINGER LAKES OPERA INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureGOODWILL OF THE FINGER LAKES INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesHILLSIDE CHILDREN'S CENTER: $26,000 · Human ServicesThe Center for Youth Services Inc: $26,000 · Human ServicesVOLUNTEER LEGAL SERVICES PROJECT OF MONROE COUNTY INC: $26,000 · Crime & LegalTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF GREATER ROCHESTER: $26,000 · Crime & LegalFOODLINK INC: $45,000 · Food & NutritionJEWISH SENIOR LIFE FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 · PhilanthropyRochester Institute of Technology: $26,000 · EducationROBERTS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · Education
Other$1,245,500Arts & Culture$93,000Human Services$82,000Crime & Legal$52,000Food & Nutrition$45,000Philanthropy$40,000Education$32,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOODLINK INC: $45,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH SENIOR LIFE FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGOODWILL OF THE FINGER LAKES INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWXXI PUBLIC BROADCASTING COUNCIL: $26,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSIDE CHILDREN'S CENTER: $26,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF ROCHESTER INC: $26,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetGEVA THEATRE CENTER INC: $26,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetVOLUNTEER LEGAL SERVICES PROJECT OF MONROE COUNTY INC: $26,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTRILLIUM HEALTH INC: $26,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRochester Institute of Technology: $26,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF GREATER ROCHESTER: $26,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMONROE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $26,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetVILLA OF HOPE: $26,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Center for Youth Services Inc: $26,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetROCHESTER PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA INC: $26,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBADEN STREET SETTLEMENT OF ROCHESTER INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetJoseph Avenue Arts and Culture Alliance Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetEQUICENTER INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetROBERTS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFINGER LAKES OPERA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES SECTION NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOODLINK INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH SENIOR LIFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GOODWILL OF THE FINGER LAKES INC ↗
  • Who funds WXXI PUBLIC BROADCASTING COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds HILLSIDE CHILDREN'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF ROCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GEVA THEATRE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTEER LEGAL SERVICES PROJECT OF MONROE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds TRILLIUM HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds Rochester Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF GREATER ROCHESTER ↗
  • Who funds MONROE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds VILLA OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds The Center for Youth Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds ROCHESTER PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds BADEN STREET SETTLEMENT OF ROCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Joseph Avenue Arts and Culture Alliance Inc ↗
  • Who funds EQUICENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ROBERTS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FINGER LAKES OPERA INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES SECTION NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Max and Marian Farash Charitable FoundationNY42.8× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Max and Marian Farash Charitable Foundation · Rochester Area Community Foundation · Daisy Marquis Jones Foundation · Greater Rochester Health Foundation · Ames-Amzalak Memorial Trust · Paychex Charitable Foundation Inc · Rochester Area Community Foundation Depository Inc · United Way of Greater Rochester and the Finger Lakes Inc · Esl Charitable Foundation · Waldron Rise Foundation Inc · Rochester Female Charitable Society · William & Sheila Konar Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Max a Adler Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Max a Adler Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Max a Adler Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Max a Adler Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Max a Adler’s filings →

    More from the funding graph