Skip to content

· Private foundation

Maturi Rammohan Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$173k
Granted FY2025still arriving
53
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$298kInternational$190kEnvironment$44kEducation$36kArts & Culture$24kFood & Nutrition$17kReligion$13kHuman Services$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 53 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k51 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $45k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$500
Median grant
13
States reached
$604k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AIM FOR SEVA$100,000
INDIA DEVELOPMENT AND RELIEF FUND$45,180
WORLD FOOD PROGRAM$1,545
HINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION$1,047
INDIANA HUMANITIES$1,040
EARTHJUSTICE$1,033
HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH$1,030
TAMIL NADU FOUNDATION$1,025
GREGORY HANCOCK DANCE THEATRE$1,015
HINDU HERITAGE ENDOWMENT$1,001
ESALEN INSTITUTE$1,000
OCEAN CONSERVANCY$1,000
CARTER CENTER$1,000
CHRISTEL HOUSE INTERNATIONAL$1,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $132k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AIM FOR SEVA: $100k → 12%COMMIT2CHANGE: $624 → 9%OLD MILL CENTER: $50 → 18%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $50 → 7%COMMIT2CHANGE: $265 → 9%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $50 → 7%JULIAN CENTER: $521 → 16%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $50 → 7%JULIAN CENTER: $521 → 16%INDY YOGA MOVEMENT: $2k → 5%JULIAN CENTER: $520 → 16%JULIAN CENTER: $518 → 16%JULIAN CENTER: $500 → 16%JULIAN CENTER: $500 → 16%JULIAN CENTER: $500 → 16%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM: $10k → 14%JULIAN CENTER: $500 → 16%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM: $2k → 14%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM: $2k → 14%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM: $2k → 14%JULIAN CENTER: $500 → 16%GROWING PLACES INDY: $200 → 16%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM: $1k → 14%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $540 → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $540 → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $540 → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $525 → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $525 → 17%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM: $1k → 14%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $500 → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $500 → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $500 → 17%INDIANA BLIND CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $2k → 16%INDIANA BLIND CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
DC
HI
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 17% of Maturi Rammohan Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Maturi Rammohan Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 22% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$478k · 49 repeat orgs$123k to everyone else

49 repeat relationships: 35 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

49
26

Total granted

$478k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+41%

Still filing today

73%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 16% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $106k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentHuman ServicesInternationalEducationHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IF
    ISHA FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $294k · revenue +91%
  • FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $17k · revenue +361%
  • HH
    HINDU HERITAGE ENDOWMENT
    9× · 2017–2025 · $10k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTERgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +55%
  • EC
    EAGLE CREEK PARK FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +54%
  • IY
    INDY YOGA MOVEMENTgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +50%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
2
Center for International Environmental Law Inc

To investigate, research, write, publish, present conferences and teach with respect to global, regional, transboundary, and comparative environmental issues and to make the findings from such activities available to the general public; to…

International
3
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
4
Cdp North America Inc

Cdp north america, inc. 's ("cdp-na") vision for the future is a thriving economy that works for people and planet in the long term. we focus investors and companies on taking urgent action to build a truly sustainable economy by measuring…

Environment
5
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
6
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
7
Climate Catalyst Inc

Climate catalyst sparks collective action to tackle the biggest climate challenges we face today: cutting emissions in heavy industries.

Environment
8
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
9
Indigenous Peoples Rights Inc

To lead and coordinate the global initiative to address and prevent criminalization, violence, and impunity against indigenous peoples towards strengthening their collectives, solidarity, and actions.

Human Services
10
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
11
Global Impact Investing Network Inc

The global impact investing network, inc. is dedicated to increasing the scale and effectiveness of impact investing to solve systemic problems facing people and the planet. impact investments are investments made into companies,…

Philanthropy
12
Environmental Law Alliance Worldwide

Educational & charitable. to provide legal and scientific information to public interest attorneys and scientists in numerous countries.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grassroots International Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sustainable Eco Alliance Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

68 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 68 of the 95 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
68/68
Grantees still filing
40/68
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ISHA FOUNDATION INC: $293,804 · EducationISHA FOUNDATION INC+4 more: $6,102 · EducationALL INDIA MOVEMENT FOR SEVA INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesALL INDIA MOVEMENT FOR…FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $17,280 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE WORLD F…THE JULIAN CENTER INC: $4,580 · Human Services+7 more: $10,238 · Human Services+7 moreUNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL: $33,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY HIGH …THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $5,060 · OtherGIVEWELL-ALL GRANTS FUND: $4,803 · OtherGIVEDIRECTLY-POVERTY RELIEF AFRICA: $4,518 · OtherNATIONAL SEXUAL ASSAULT HOTLINE: $3,533 · OtherCentral Indiana Community Foundation Inc: $6,015 · OtherCentral Indiana …TAMIL NADU FOUNDATION INC: $3,275 · Other+40 more: $35,771 · Other+40 moreINDIA DEVELOPMENT AND RELIEF FUND INC: $52,390 · InternationalINDIA DEVELO…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $8,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SAN…HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $7,590 · InternationalHUMAN RIGHTS…+6 more: $4,869 · International+6 moreEARTHJUSTICE: $7,533 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $5,125 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $2,650 · EnvironmentCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC: $2,629 · EnvironmentRAINFOREST FOUNDATION INC: $1,851 · EnvironmentGLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND: $1,000 · Environment+8 more: $2,975 · EnvironmentHINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC: $8,760 · Arts & CultureIndianapolis Dance Company DBA Gregory Hancock Dance Theatre: $8,610 · Arts & CultureMetropolitan Indianapolis Public Media Inc: $3,765 · Arts & CultureNORTH AMERICAN BEAR CENTER: $1,000 · Arts & CultureINDIANA WRITERS CENTER INC: $805 · Arts & CultureHINDU HERITAGE ENDOWMENT: $10,003 · Crime & LegalSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $2,515 · Crime & LegalEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $1,650 · Crime & Legal+1 more: $52 · Crime & Legal
Education$299,906Human Services$132,098Other$95,975International$72,849Environment$28,763Arts & Culture$22,940Crime & Legal$14,220

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetISHA FOUNDATION INC: $293,804 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetINDIA DEVELOPMENT AND RELIEF FUND INC: $52,390 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $17,280 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHINDU HERITAGE ENDOWMENT: $10,003 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC: $8,760 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetIndianapolis Dance Company DBA Gregory Hancock Dance Theatre: $8,610 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $7,590 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $7,533 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Indiana Community Foundation Inc: $6,015 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $5,125 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $5,060 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JULIAN CENTER INC: $4,580 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $4,170 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMetropolitan Indianapolis Public Media Inc: $3,765 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANA BLIND CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $3,279 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTAMIL NADU FOUNDATION INC: $3,275 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSpace for Giants USA Inc: $3,061 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $2,810 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $2,650 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC: $2,629 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $2,515 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL CHARITY EVALUATORS: $2,074 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEAGLE CREEK PARK FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRAINFOREST FOUNDATION INC: $1,851 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $1,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $1,650 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANA HUMANITIES COUNCIL INC: $1,617 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetINDY YOGA MOVEMENT: $1,500 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetGRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $1,010 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHINMAYA EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH AMERICAN BEAR CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND: $1,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMIT-2-CHANGE: $889 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANA WRITERS CENTER INC: $805 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetPROJECT INNERSPACE INC: $780 over 3y, 0.0% of budget350ORG: $758 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKEEP INDIANAPOLIS BEAUTIFUL INC: $523 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRape Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN): $516 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKESTREL LAND TRUST INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEVA FOUNDATION: $359 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $255 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHOUSAND CURRENTS: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ISHA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ALL INDIA MOVEMENT FOR SEVA INC ↗
  • Who funds INDIA DEVELOPMENT AND RELIEF FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds HINDU HERITAGE ENDOWMENT ↗
  • Who funds HINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Indianapolis Dance Company DBA Gregory Hancock Dance Theatre ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JULIAN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Metropolitan Indianapolis Public Media Inc ↗
  • Who funds INDIANA BLIND CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TAMIL NADU FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Space for Giants USA Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL CHARITY EVALUATORS ↗
  • Who funds EAGLE CREEK PARK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RAINFOREST FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NETWORK FOR GOOD ↗
  • Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds INDIANA HUMANITIES COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds INDY YOGA MOVEMENT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lilly Endowment IncIN26× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lilly Endowment Inc · Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Christel DeHaan Family Foundation Inc · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Maurer Family Foundation Inc · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · Salesforce Foundation · Dorsey Foundation Inc · Allen Whitehill Clowes Charitable Foundation Inc · United Way of Central Indiana Inc · Lumina Foundation for Education Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Maturi Rammohan Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Maturi Rammohan Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 34%
  • Old Mill Center for Children and Families Inc: 38% of income from government
  • Project Innerspace Inc: 34% of income from government
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Maturi Rammohan Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Maturi Rammohan Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 95 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Maturi Rammohan’s filings →

More from the funding graph