Skip to content

· Private foundation

Matthew 25 35 Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$84k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$57k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Religion$330kInternational$54kEducation$10kHealth$7kHuman Services$195Other$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $57k
$2,200
Median grant
5
States reached
$200k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OLD PATHS BIBLE BABTIST CHURCH$56,745
BAPTIST INTL MISSIONS INC$17,840
COMPASSION$2,666
BAPTIST INTERNATIONAL OUTREACH$2,500
HONDURAS MISSIONS$2,200
WORLD VISION$689
COMPASSCARE$500
OLD PATHS BIBLE BABTIST CHURCH$500
MORNING CENTER$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%OLD PATHS BIBLE BABTIST CHURCH: $57k → 11%LET THEM LAUGH: $800 → 13%COMPASSCARE: $5k → 14%Silvery Lane Baptist Chruch: $250 → 21%GRACEBIBLE BAPTIST CHURCH: $1k → 15%CAREPORTAL: $273 → 15%SHELLY BURKS: $1k → 18%BAPTIST INTERNATIONAL OUTREACH: $3k → 11%CROWN COLLEGE: $10k → 12%BAPTIST INTL MISSIONS INC: $18k → 12%MACADONIA WBM: $1k → 7%Word for the World Baptist Ministri: $7k → 15%COMPASSION: $3k → 9%HARVEST BAPTIST: $3k → 12%HONDURAS MISSIONS: $15k → 15%HANNAH PARFITT: $1k → 10%HSLDA: $100 → 4%OLD PATHS BIBLE BABTIST CHURCH: $48k → 11%Let Them Laugh: $407 → 13%CompassCare: $1k → 14%Word for the World Baptist Ministries: $3k → 15%COMPASSION: $2k → 9%Honduras Missions: $10k → 15%OLD PATHS BIBLE BABTIST CHURCH: $46k → 11%COMPASSCARE: $570 → 14%COMPASSION: $1k → 9%HONDURAS MISSIONS: $7k → 15%OLD PATHS BIBLE BABTIST CHURCH: $34k → 11%COMPASSCARE: $500 → 14%Compassion: $1k → 9%Honduras Missions: $3k → 15%OLD PATHS BIBLE BABTIST CHURCH: $33k → 11%Old Paths Bible Baptist Church: $10k → 14%COMPASSION: $1k → 9%HONDURAS MISSIONS: $3k → 15%OLD PATHS BIBLE BABTIST CHURCH: $25k → 11%MATTACCHIERA: $3k → 14%COMPASSION: $1k → 9%HONDURAS MISSIONS: $3k → 15%OLD PATHS BIBLE BABTIST CHURCH: $23k → 11%MISSIONARY CHURCH: $350 → 14%Compassion: $617 → 9%HONDURAS MISSIONS: $2k → 15%OLD PATHS BIBLE BABTIST CHURCH: $21k → 11%COMPASSION: $516 → 9%HONDURAS MISSIONS: $100 → 15%OLD PATHS BIBLE BABTIST CHURCH: $500 → 11%FOCUS ON THE FAMILY: $120 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MI
NY
OH
CO
MO
VA
TN
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$357k · 6 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
17

Total granted

$357k
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+10%

Still filing today

17%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthReligionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OP
    OLD PATHS BIBLE BABTIST CHURCH
    8× · 2018–2025 · $286k
  • HM
    HONDURAS MISSIONS
    8× · 2018–2025 · $42k
  • Compassion International Incorporated
    8× · 2018–2025 · $11k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • OP
    Old Paths Bible Baptist Church
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • CC
    CROWN COLLEGE
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +10%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OLD PATHS BIBLE BABTIST CHURCH: $285,866 · OtherOLD PATHS BIBLE BABTIST CHURCHHONDURAS MISSIONS: $42,415 · OtherHONDURAS MISSIONSBAPTIST INTERNATIONAL MISSIONS INCORPORATED: $17,840 · Other+19 more: $42,322 · Other+19 moreCompassion International Incorporated: $10,548 · InternationalWORLD VISION INC: $763 · InternationalWord for the World Baptist Ministries Inc: $9,500 · ReligionTHE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT INC: $273 · PhilanthropyMORNING CENTER: $50 · Health
Other$388,443International$11,311Religion$9,500Philanthropy$273Health$50

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCompassion International Incorporated: $10,548 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCROWN COLLEGE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWord for the World Baptist Ministries Inc: $9,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $763 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT INC: $273 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOW YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMORNING CENTER: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds CROWN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Word for the World Baptist Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOW YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MORNING CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA8.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Matthew 25 35 Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Matthew 25 35 Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Matthew 25 35’s filings →

    More from the funding graph